Michael J Falvo1, Gammon M Earhart. 1. Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the six-minute walk distance (6MWD) in subjects with Parkinson disease (PD) and to determine the impairments that contribute to walking capacity. DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional study of subjects with PD. SETTING: University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects with PD (N=75; 65.0+/-9.5y) of mild to moderate severity, as defined by an average Hoehn and Yahr (HY) rating of 2.0+/-0.4 and Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score of 27+/-8.9, were tested on medication. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects were administered the motor subsection of the UPDRS and completed the following tests: Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up & Go (TUG), and six-minute walk test. In addition, they also provided self-reports of freezing of gait and number of falls in the past 6 months. RESULTS: The average 6MWD was 391.6+/-99.9 m. All of the aforementioned tests, with the exception of fall number (P=.07), correlated significantly with 6MWD (r range, -.64 to .55). By using a hierarchical regression model, we entered age, HY, and UPDRS motor score into the first block (ie, set of independent variables) to represent parkinsonian characteristics, which explained a significant amount of variability in 6MWD (R2=.196, P<.001). The second block entered (eg, functional measures scores, self-reports) explained a significant amount of additional variability (R2 change=.355, P<.001). The TUG, BBS, and number of falls contributed independently in the presence of all independent variables. CONCLUSIONS: The 6MWD in subjects with PD is explained in part by disease-specific characteristics and perhaps to a greater extent by impaired balance and predisposition to falling. Training targeted at improving balance and reducing falling risk factors may increase 6MWD (ie, walking capacity) in subjects with PD.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the six-minute walk distance (6MWD) in subjects with Parkinson disease (PD) and to determine the impairments that contribute to walking capacity. DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional study of subjects with PD. SETTING: University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects with PD (N=75; 65.0+/-9.5y) of mild to moderate severity, as defined by an average Hoehn and Yahr (HY) rating of 2.0+/-0.4 and Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score of 27+/-8.9, were tested on medication. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects were administered the motor subsection of the UPDRS and completed the following tests: Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up & Go (TUG), and six-minute walk test. In addition, they also provided self-reports of freezing of gait and number of falls in the past 6 months. RESULTS: The average 6MWD was 391.6+/-99.9 m. All of the aforementioned tests, with the exception of fall number (P=.07), correlated significantly with 6MWD (r range, -.64 to .55). By using a hierarchical regression model, we entered age, HY, and UPDRS motor score into the first block (ie, set of independent variables) to represent parkinsonian characteristics, which explained a significant amount of variability in 6MWD (R2=.196, P<.001). The second block entered (eg, functional measures scores, self-reports) explained a significant amount of additional variability (R2 change=.355, P<.001). The TUG, BBS, and number of falls contributed independently in the presence of all independent variables. CONCLUSIONS: The 6MWD in subjects with PD is explained in part by disease-specific characteristics and perhaps to a greater extent by impaired balance and predisposition to falling. Training targeted at improving balance and reducing falling risk factors may increase 6MWD (ie, walking capacity) in subjects with PD.
Authors: Mon S Bryant; Diana H Rintala; James E Graham; Jyhgong Gabriel Hou; Elizabeth J Protas Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Brian J Loyd; Scott Stackhouse; Michael Dayton; Craig Hogan; Michael Bade; Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley Journal: Knee Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Gustavo Christofoletti; Marie E McNeely; Meghan C Campbell; Ryan P Duncan; Gammon M Earhart Journal: Hum Mov Sci Date: 2016-08-20 Impact factor: 2.161
Authors: Joe R Nocera; Elizabeth L Stegemöller; Irene A Malaty; Michael S Okun; Michael Marsiske; Chris J Hass Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 3.966