| Literature DB >> 19480693 |
Eugene J Fine1, Anna Miller, Edward V Quadros, Jeffrey M Sequeira, Richard D Feinman.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that several human cancers are capable of uncoupling of mitochondrial ATP generation in the presence of intact tricarboxylic acid (TCA) enzymes. The goal of the current study was to test the hypothesis that ketone bodies can inhibit cell growth in aggressive cancers and that expression of uncoupling protein 2 is a contributing factor. The proposed mechanism involves inhibition of glycolytic ATP production via a Randle-like cycle while increased uncoupling renders cancers unable to produce compensatory ATP from respiration.Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19480693 PMCID: PMC2694762 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2867-9-14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Cell Int ISSN: 1475-2867 Impact factor: 5.722
96 h cell lines grown in 10 mM glucose either with or without acetoacetate*
| [Acetoacetate]d | ATPe nmols/mg protein | %ATPf | Cell count ×106/ml | %cell countg | UCP2 OD | % viability | Total Protein/106 cells | % total Protein |
| *0 | 85.2 | 100% | 0.85 | 100% | 66.0 | 99.7 | 9.85 | 100% |
| *10 mM | 90.2 | 106% | 0.805 | 94.7% | 47.7 | 99.7 | 10.63 | 107.9% |
| *0 | 146.3 | 100% | 0.126 | 100% | 104.5 | 94.0 | 7.61 | 100% |
| *10 mM | 185.8 | 127% | 0.140 | 111.1% | 69.7 | 98.2 | 8.80 | 115.6% |
| *0 | 198.5 | 100% | 0.198 | 100% | 80.0h | 98.8 | 8.75 | 100% |
| *10 mM | 184.5 | 93.2% | 0.206 | 101.5% | 59.9h | 97.0 | 9.45 | 108.0% |
| *0 | 693.5 | 100% | 1.94 | 100% | 99.4 | 7.8 | 100% | |
| *10 mM | 100 | 7.7 | 98.7% | |||||
| *0 | 597.0 | 100% | 1.39 | 100% | 95.5 | 12.8 | 100% | |
| *10 mM | 93.5 | 11.6 | 90.6% | |||||
| *0 | 700.0 | 100% | 5.40 | 100% | 100 | 14.6 | 100% | |
| *10 mM | 100 | 12.6 | 86.3% | |||||
| *0 | 590.0 | 100% | 0.87 | 100% | 97.0 | 11.95 | 100% | |
| *10 mM | 540.5 | 91.6% | 91.5 | 10.8 | 90.5% | |||
| *0 | 433.0 | 100% | 1.02 | 100% | 98.9 | 13.1 | 100% | |
| *10 mM | 97.9 | 9.50 | 68.3% | |||||
| *0 | 296.5 | 100% | 0.275 | 100% | 93.5 | 7.10 | 100% | |
| *10 mM | 92.9 | 7.90 | 111.3% | |||||
| *0 | 267.0 | 100% | 0.72 | 100% | 99.1 | 17.95 | 100% | |
| *10 mM | 99.3 | 21.0 | 117.0% | |||||
*For standard errors of all measurements see Figures 2 – 5 (based upon ATP and cell count studies performed in triplicate; and UCP2 measurements performed in duplicate).
ATP and cell growth values in bold print are significantly lower (p < 0.05) than the values in glucose only medium for the same cell line. UCP2 values in are significantly higher (p < 0.05) than mean of control fibroblast lines for each growth medium.
d [Acetoacetate] = Concentration of Acetoacetate in medium
e ATP production expressed as nmol ATP/mg protein
f % of ATP production at 96 h compared with 10 mM glucose and 0 mM acetoacetate (defined as 100%)
g Cell count expressed as % of 96 h growth in 10 mM glucose and 0 mM acetoacetate
h Calculated from the slope of its ELISA curve (0.043/μg protein, not shown) in comparison to Fig. 1B for RFP3 cells, then recalibrated to ImageJ OD/cell.
Figure 1Specificity of UCP2 ELISA. (A) Standard curve of UCP2 antigen is calibrated against sandwich ELISA assay (see text). (B) UCP2 is calculated from standard curve in cell lysates from RFP3, SW48 and MDA MB 231 (B, C, and D respectively). Slopes of regressions represent ng UCP2 per μg total protein.
Figure 2Lack of non-specific protein inhibition. There is no significant correlation between expression of cellular protein and the % change in ATP due to supplemental acetoacetate in the medium. r2 = 0.08 (p > 0.2) Data are from Table 1.
Figure 3(A): The effect of adding acetoacetate to glucose medium on ATP concentration and cell growth. ATP and cell growth are both expressed as a percent of the respective values obtained at 96 h in 10 mM glucose (only) medium. M64 and M65 represent MCH 064 and MCH 065 cell lines, respectively. (B) The relation of cell growth to ATP concentration. Normal fibroblast controls RFP3, MCH 064 and 065 (in top right oval) demonstrate neither growth inhibition nor reduced ATP. All other data points represent seven cancer cell lines of Table 1 with parallel reduction in ATP and cell growth as also see in 3A. Regression equation plots growth (g) vs. ATP concentration (a) in blue in lower right of figure (p < 0.01). Data are from Table 1.
Figure 4Cell growth vs. UCP2 expression in fibroblast controls vs. cancer lines. Purple series represents UCP2 in cells grown in glucose medium; blue series represents cell lines grown in glucose plus acetoacetate. Cancer lines over-express UCP2 vs. control fibroblasts when grown in either medium. Asterisks reflect significant differences (p < 0.05) in UCP2 values for cells grown in G or G+AcA growth medium when compared to corresponding results from all fibroblast lines. Data are from Table 1.
Figure 5UCP2 expression in fibroblasts vs. MDA MB 231. Peroxidase staining of RFP3 controls (top) involves fewer cells and is less intense than of MDA MB 231 (bottom). Magnification 100×.
Figure 6ATP concentration as a function of UCP2 expression. (ATP (y) in acetoacetate medium as a function of UCP2 expression (x) [regression equation upper right; p < 0.05]. Lowest expression of UCP2 with greatest ATP preservation is present in control fibroblasts (in oval). SW48 is identified as an outlier. (Data are from Table 1).