Literature DB >> 19479982

Physiologically based predictions of the impact of inhibition of intestinal and hepatic metabolism on human pharmacokinetics of CYP3A substrates.

Frederique Fenneteau1, Patrick Poulin, Fahima Nekka.   

Abstract

The first objective of the present study was to predict the pharmacokinetics of selected CYP3A substrates administered at a single oral dose to human. The second objective was to predict pharmacokinetics of the selected drugs in presence of inhibitors of the intestinal and/or hepatic CYP3A activity. We developed a whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetics (WB-PBPK) model accounting for presystemic elimination of midazolam (MDZ), alprazolam (APZ), triazolam (TRZ), and simvastatin (SMV). The model also accounted for concomitant administration of the above-mentioned drugs with CYP3A inhibitors, namely ketoconazole (KTZ), itraconazole (ITZ), diltiazem (DTZ), saquinavir (SQV), and a furanocoumarin contained in grape-fruit juice (GFJ), namely 6',7'-dihydroxybergamottin (DHB). Model predictions were compared to published clinical data. An uncertainty analysis was performed to account for the variability and uncertainty of model parameters when predicting the model outcomes. We also briefly report on the results of our efforts to develop a global sensitivity analysis and its application to the current WB-PBPK model. Considering the current criterion for a successful prediction, judged satisfied once the clinical data are captured within the 5th and 95th percentiles of the predicted concentration-time profiles, a successful prediction has been obtained for a single oral administration of MDZ and SMV. For APZ and TRZ, however, a slight deviation toward the 95th percentile was observed especially for C(max) but, overall, the in vivo profiles were well captured by the PBPK model. Moreover, the impact of DHB-mediated inhibition on the extent of intestinal pre-systemic elimination of MDZ and SMV has been accurately predicted by the proposed PBPK model. For concomitant administrations of MDZ and ITZ, APZ and KTZ, as well as SMV and DTZ, the in vivo concentration-time profiles were accurately captured by the model. A slight deviation was observed for SMV when coadministered with ITZ, whereas more important deviations have been obtained between the model predictions and in vivo concentration-time profiles of MDZ coadministered with SQV. The same observation was made for TRZ when administered with KTZ. Most of the pharmacokinetic parameters predicted by the PBPK model were successfully predicted within a two-fold error range either in the absence or presence of metabolism-based inhibition. Overall, the present study demonstrated the ability of the PBPK model to predict DDI of CYP3A substrates with promising accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19479982     DOI: 10.1002/jps.21802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  20 in total

Review 1.  Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling and Simulation Approaches: A Systematic Review of Published Models, Applications, and Model Verification.

Authors:  Jennifer E Sager; Jingjing Yu; Isabelle Ragueneau-Majlessi; Nina Isoherranen
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.922

2.  The importance of villous physiology and morphology in mechanistic physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models.

Authors:  Emile P Chen; Guoying Tai; Harma Ellens
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Influence of dietary substances on intestinal drug metabolism and transport.

Authors:  Christina S Won; Nicholas H Oberlies; Mary F Paine
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 4.  Drug-drug interaction studies: regulatory guidance and an industry perspective.

Authors:  Thomayant Prueksaritanont; Xiaoyan Chu; Christopher Gibson; Donghui Cui; Ka Lai Yee; Jeanine Ballard; Tamara Cabalu; Jerome Hochman
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 5.  Optimizing nanomedicine pharmacokinetics using physiologically based pharmacokinetics modelling.

Authors:  Darren Michael Moss; Marco Siccardi
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Potential for pharmacokinetic interactions between Schisandra sphenanthera and bosutinib, but not imatinib: in vitro metabolism study combined with a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling approach.

Authors:  Jeffry Adiwidjaja; Alan V Boddy; Andrew J McLachlan
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Prediction of Tissue-Plasma Partition Coefficients Using Microsomal Partitioning: Incorporation into Physiologically based Pharmacokinetic Models and Steady-State Volume of Distribution Predictions.

Authors:  Kimberly Holt; Min Ye; Swati Nagar; Ken Korzekwa
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 8.  Mechanisms underlying food-drug interactions: inhibition of intestinal metabolism and transport.

Authors:  Christina S Won; Nicholas H Oberlies; Mary F Paine
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 9.  Prediction of drug disposition on the basis of its chemical structure.

Authors:  David Stepensky
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to predict the pharmacokinetics of highly protein-bound drugs and the impact of errors in plasma protein binding.

Authors:  Min Ye; Swati Nagar; Ken Korzekwa
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.