Literature DB >> 19477890

Reporting of adverse events in randomized controlled trials of highly active antiretroviral therapy: systematic review.

Michal Y Chowers1, Bat Sheva Gottesman, Leonard Leibovici, Ulrike Pielmeier, Steen Andreassen, Mical Paul.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to systematically assess the quality of reporting of adverse events (AEs) in publications of randomized trials of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), and to examine whether reporting quality affects the effect estimates reported for AEs.
METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane library and EMBASE electronic databases up to December 2008. We included all published randomized controlled trials assessing HAART for treatment-naive adult HIV-infected individuals, with 48 weeks' follow-up. The quality of AE reporting was extracted according to CONSORT guidelines. We pooled the relative risks for AEs and compared results by sponsorship and different reporting methods.
RESULTS: Forty-nine trials, including 19 882 patients, published between 2000 and 2008, met the inclusion criteria. Only one of the trials reported on AE collection methods. Twenty-six trials reported only AEs attributed to drugs, 17 of which did not refer to the attribution methods. AE reporting was nearly always selective and selection criteria were highly variable, based on severity grading or occurrence threshold. Presentation of AEs above an occurrence threshold was more common in studies sponsored by industry (30/31) than in studies sponsored by non-profit organizations (3/18). Moreover, we showed that differences in the methods of reporting AEs may affect the results reported for AEs. No significant improvement in AE reporting was seen over this period.
CONCLUSIONS: We found substantial variability in AE reporting. Variability was influenced by sponsor identity and affected outcomes. These facts obstruct our ability to choose HAART based on currently published data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19477890     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkp191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  21 in total

1.  Responsible reporting of health research studies: transparent, complete, accurate and timely.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Iveta Simera
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Incidence and risk factors for tenofovir-associated renal toxicity in HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  Pedro Rodríguez Quesada; Laura López Esteban; Jimena Ramón García; Rocío Vázquez Sánchez; Teresa Molina García; Gabriel Gaspar Alonso-Vega; Javier Sánchez-Rubio Ferrández
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2015-05-26

3.  Patient-reported symptoms on the antiretroviral regimen efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir.

Authors:  E Jennifer Edelman; Kirsha Gordon; Maria C Rodriguez-Barradas; Amy C Justice
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 5.078

Review 4.  Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network.

Authors:  Iveta Simera; David Moher; Allison Hirst; John Hoey; Kenneth F Schulz; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 5.  What do we really know about the safety of tai chi?: A systematic review of adverse event reports in randomized trials.

Authors:  Peter M Wayne; Danielle L Berkowitz; Daniel E Litrownik; Julie E Buring; Gloria Y Yeh
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Failure or success of electronic search strategies to identify adverse effects data.

Authors:  Su Golder; Yoon Kong Loke
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2012-04

Review 7.  Industry sponsorship and research outcome.

Authors:  Andreas Lundh; Joel Lexchin; Barbara Mintzes; Jeppe B Schroll; Lisa Bero
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-16

Review 8.  Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.

Authors:  Lucy Turner; Larissa Shamseer; Douglas G Altman; Laura Weeks; Jodi Peters; Thilo Kober; Sofia Dias; Kenneth F Schulz; Amy C Plint; David Moher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

9.  Completeness of reporting of quality improvement studies in neonatology is inadequate: a systematic literature survey.

Authors:  Catherine Hu; Jie Yi Wang; Zoe El Helou; Muhammad Taaha Hassan; Zheng Jing Hu; Gerhard Fusch; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Salhab El Helou; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2021-06

10.  A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature.

Authors:  Zainab Samaan; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Daisy Kosa; Victoria Borg Debono; Rejane Dillenburg; Shiyuan Zhang; Vincent Fruci; Brittany Dennis; Monica Bawor; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2013-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.