Literature DB >> 19477634

Predictive signatures for chemotherapy sensitivity in breast cancer: are they ready for use in the clinic?

Hervé Bonnefoi1, Craig Underhill, Richard Iggo, David Cameron.   

Abstract

Markers that predict the sensitivity of tumours to chemotherapy must address two questions: (a) which tumours are more likely to respond to chemotherapy? and (b) what is the optimal chemotherapy regimen for a specific tumour or group of tumours? To answer these questions will require markers of general chemosensitivity and drug-specific chemosensitivity, respectively. Beyond these fundamental questions lies an important practical question: are the predictive markers in the current literature ready for routine clinical use? The focus of this paper is to address this practical question. We will first review retrospective trials that have reported promising chemotherapy signatures, presenting in a comprehensive manner for the non bio-informatician the different methods used so far. In addition, we will summarise prospective trials (either ongoing or under development) designed to test the multigene classifiers currently thought to predict chemosensitivity. Finally, we will discuss why microarray studies have so far failed to identify new targets, and how we might be able to improve on these results through large-scale genotyping of tumours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19477634     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.04.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  10 in total

Review 1.  Emerging role of microRNAs in drug-resistant breast cancer.

Authors:  Sarmila Majumder; Samson T Jacob
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Molecular tests as prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  Marc J van de Vijver
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Genome-wide mRNA and microRNA profiling of the NCI 60 cell-line screen and comparison of FdUMP[10] with fluorouracil, floxuridine, and topoisomerase 1 poisons.

Authors:  William H Gmeiner; William C Reinhold; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  Challenges translating breast cancer gene signatures into the clinic.

Authors:  Britta Weigelt; Lajos Pusztai; Alan Ashworth; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Optimally discriminative subnetwork markers predict response to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Phuong Dao; Kendric Wang; Colin Collins; Martin Ester; Anna Lapuk; S Cenk Sahinalp
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Importance of pre-analytical steps for transcriptome and RT-qPCR analyses in the context of the phase II randomised multicentre trial REMAGUS02 of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Patricia de Cremoux; Fabien Valet; David Gentien; Jacqueline Lehmann-Che; Véronique Scott; Carine Tran-Perennou; Catherine Barbaroux; Nicolas Servant; Sophie Vacher; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani; Marie-Christine Mathieu; Philippe Bertheau; Jean-Marc Guinebretière; Bernard Asselain; Michel Marty; Frédérique Spyratos
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  A new gene expression signature, the ClinicoMolecular Triad Classification, may improve prediction and prognostication of breast cancer at the time of diagnosis.

Authors:  Dong-Yu Wang; Susan J Done; David R McCready; Scott Boerner; Supriya Kulkarni; Wey Liang Leong
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 8.  Ki-67: level of evidence and methodological considerations for its role in the clinical management of breast cancer: analytical and critical review.

Authors:  Elisabeth Luporsi; Fabrice André; Frédérique Spyratos; Pierre-Marie Martin; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Nicole Tubiana-Mathieu; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani; Laurent Arnould; Anne Gompel; Caroline Egele; Bruno Poulet; Krishna B Clough; Hubert Crouet; Alain Fourquet; Jean-Pierre Lefranc; Carole Mathelin; Nicolas Rouyer; Daniel Serin; Marc Spielmann; Margaret Haugh; Marie-Pierre Chenard; Etienne Brain; Patricia de Cremoux; Jean-Pierre Bellocq
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Peritumoral vascular invasion and NHERF1 expression define an immunophenotype of grade 2 invasive breast cancer associated with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Andrea Malfettone; Concetta Saponaro; Angelo Paradiso; Giovanni Simone; Annita Mangia
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Genetic characterization of breast cancer and implications for clinical management.

Authors:  Felipe C Geyer; Maria A Lopez-Garcia; Maryou B Lambros; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.310

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.