Literature DB >> 19477442

Comparing grades of urgency for classification of cesarean delivery.

Jeroen van Dillen1, Marijn Diesch, Joke Schutte, Joost Zwart, Ron Wolterbeek, Jos van Roosmalen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the agreement between the traditional binary system and a new system for classifying urgency of cesarean delivery among obstetricians in The Netherlands and Belgium.
METHODS: A total of 212 obstetricians were requested to grade a list of 18 obstetric scenarios using 3 classification systems: traditional binary classification; a new classification using 4 grades of urgency without additional interpretation; and the new classification with additional interpretation. Agreement was assessed by weighted kappa.
RESULTS: Seventy-nine obstetricians responded (The Netherlands 62.2%, Belgium 9.9%). There was substantial agreement among them for all 3 classification systems (kappa=0.71, traditional classification; kappa=0.70, new classification; kappa=0.67, new classification with additional interpretation).
CONCLUSION: The traditional binary system and the new classification of cesarean delivery based on 4 grades of urgency, with and without additional interpretation, have similar but relatively low interobserver agreement. We suggest that the new classification should be used, but future studies are necessary to evaluate the effect of this implementation.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19477442     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  2 in total

Review 1.  Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Regina Torloni; Ana Pilar Betran; Joao Paulo Souza; Mariana Widmer; Tomas Allen; Metin Gulmezoglu; Mario Merialdi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Pre-eclampsia increases the risk of postpartum haemorrhage: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Joost F von Schmidt auf Altenstadt; Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven; Jos van Roosmalen; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.