Literature DB >> 19477372

Inflammatory biomarkers in coronary artery disease.

Epaminondas Zakynthinos1, Nikolitsa Pappa.   

Abstract

Current evidence supports that inflammation is a major driving force underlying the initiation of coronary plaques, their unstable progression, and eventual disruption; patients with a more pronounced vascular inflammatory response have a poorer outcome. Biomarkers are generally considered to be proteins or enzymes - measured in serum, plasma, or blood - that provide independent diagnostic and prognostic value by reflecting an underlying disease state. In the case of coronary artery disease (CAD), inflammatory biomarkers, have been extensively investigated; more evidence exists for C-reactive protein (CRP). Using high sensitivity (hs) assays, epidemiologic data demonstrate an association between hs-CRP and risk for future cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among those at high risk or with documented CAD. Moreover, a series of prospective studies provide consistent data documenting that mild elevation of baseline levels of hs-CRP among apparently healthy individuals is associated with higher long-term risk for cardiovascular events. Yet, the predictive value of hs-CRP is found to be independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies suggest that, besides CRP, other inflammatory biomarkers such as cytokines [interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)], soluble CD40 ligand, serum amyloid A (SAA), selectins (E-selectin, P-selectin), myeloperoxidase (MPO), matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), cellular adhesion molecules [intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), vascular adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1)], placental growth factor (PlGF) and A(2) phospholipases may have a potential role for the prediction of risk for developing CAD and may correlate with severity of CAD. Finally, indications suggest that the increased risk associated with inflammation may be modified with certain preventive therapies and biomarkers may help to identify the individuals who would benefit most from these interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19477372     DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2008.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiol        ISSN: 0914-5087            Impact factor:   3.159


  101 in total

1.  Endothelial cell attachment and shear response on biomimetic polymer-coated vascular grafts.

Authors:  Lynn A Dudash; Faina Kligman; Samantha M Sarett; Kandice Kottke-Marchant; Roger E Marchant
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.396

2.  Red blood cell MUFAs and risk of coronary artery disease in the Physicians' Health Study.

Authors:  Chisa Matsumoto; Nirupa R Matthan; Alice H Lichtenstein; J Michael Gaziano; Luc Djoussé
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Trends in laboratory test volumes for Medicare Part B reimbursements, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Shahram Shahangian; Todd D Alspach; J Rex Astles; Ajay Yesupriya; William K Dettwyler
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 4.  Effect of ezetimibe on plasma adipokines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eva Dolezelova; Evan Stein; Giuseppe Derosa; Pamela Maffioli; Petr Nachtigal; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Serum concentrations of MCP-1 and IL-6 in combination predict the presence of coronary artery disease and mortality in subjects undergoing coronary angiography.

Authors:  Mohammad Tajfard; Latiffah A Latiff; Hamid Reza Rahimi; Mohsen Moohebati; Mehdi Hasanzadeh; Ahmad Sarreshtehdar Emrani; Habibollah Esmaeily; Ali Taghipour; Sayed Reza Mirhafez; Gordon A Ferns; Maryam Mardan-Nik; Elham Mohammadzadeh; Amir Avan; Parichehr Hanachi; Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.396

6.  Significance of serum endothelial cell specific molecule-1 (Endocan) level in patients with erectile dysfunction: a pilot study.

Authors:  M Karabakan; A Bozkurt; S Akdemir; M Gunay; E Keskin
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.896

7.  Inflammasome Signaling and Impaired Vascular Health in Psoriasis.

Authors:  Michael S Garshick; Tessa J Barrett; Todd Wechter; Sarah Azarchi; Jose U Scher; Andrea Neimann; Stuart Katz; Judilyn Fuentes-Duculan; Maria V Cannizzaro; Sanja Jelic; Edward A Fisher; James G Krueger; Jeffrey S Berger
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 8.  Common and Novel Markers for Measuring Inflammation and Oxidative Stress Ex Vivo in Research and Clinical Practice-Which to Use Regarding Disease Outcomes?

Authors:  Alain Menzel; Hanen Samouda; Francois Dohet; Suva Loap; Mohammed S Ellulu; Torsten Bohn
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-09

9.  Expanded network of inflammatory markers of atherogenesis: where are we now?

Authors:  Seyed Hesameddin Abbasi; Mohammad Ali Boroumand
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2010-02-23

10.  Soluble CD14, CD163, and CD27 biomarkers distinguish ART-suppressed youth living with HIV from healthy controls.

Authors:  Julie C Williams; Xinrui Zhang; Manju Karki; Yueh-Yun Chi; Shannon M Wallet; Bret J Rudy; Sharon L Nichols; Maureen M Goodenow; John W Sleasman
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.