Literature DB >> 19476827

Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial.

Adam C Berger1, Thomas J Howard, Eugene P Kennedy, Patricia K Sauter, Maryanne Bower-Cherry, Sarah Dutkevitch, Terry Hyslop, C Max Schmidt, Ernest L Rosato, Harish Lavu, Atilla Nakeeb, Henry A Pitt, Keith D Lillemoe, Charles J Yeo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula (PF) is one of the most common complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. There have been no large prospective randomized trials evaluating PF rates comparing invagination versus duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy. We tested the hypothesis that a duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy would reduce the PF rate. STUDY
DESIGN: Between August 2006 and May 2008, 197 patients at two institutions underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy by a total of 8 experienced pancreatic surgeons as part of this prospective randomized trial (clinical trial no. NCT00359320). All patients were stratified by pancreatic texture and randomized to either an invagination or a duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis. Recorded variables included pancreatic duct diameter, operative time, blood loss, complications, and pathology. Primary end point was PF rate, as defined by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. Secondary end points included PF grade, postoperative length of hospital stay, other morbidities, and mortality.
RESULTS: Rate of PF for the entire cohort was 17.8%. There were 23 fistulas (24%) in the duct to mucosa cohort and 12 fistulas (12%) in the invagination cohort (p < 0.05). The greatest risk factor for a PF was pancreas texture: PF developed in only 8 patients (8%) with hard glands, and in 27 patients (27%) with a soft gland. There were two perioperative deaths (both in the duct to mucosa group), with the proximate causes of death being PF, followed by bleeding and sepsis.
CONCLUSIONS: This dual-institution prospective randomized trial reveals considerably fewer fistulas with invagination compared with duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Results confirm increased PF rates in soft as compared with hard glands. Additional studies are needed to define the optimal technique of pancreatic reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19476827     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.12.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  86 in total

Review 1.  Techniques for prevention of pancreatic leak after pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Hans F Schoellhammer; Yuman Fong; Singh Gagandeep
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 2.  Pancreatic surgery: evolution and current tailored approach.

Authors:  Mario Zovak; Dubravka Mužina Mišić; Goran Glavčić
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  Prevention, evaluation, and treatment of leaks after gastrointestinal surgery : prevention of leaks after pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Duct-to-Mucosa Versus Invagination Pancreaticojejunostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jie Hua; Zhigang He; Daohai Qian; Hongbo Meng; Bo Zhou; Zhenshun Song
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Surgery for Pancreatic and Periampullary Carcinoma.

Authors:  Abhishek Mitra; Ashwin D'Souza; Mahesh Goel; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  Is Sutureless Pancreaticogastrostomy More Effective than Single-Layer Duct-to-Mucosa Pancreaticojejunostomy in Pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Daniel Kostov; Georgi Kobakov
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2017-06

7.  Risk-adapted anastomosis for partial pancreaticoduodenectomy reduces the risk of pancreatic fistula: a pilot study.

Authors:  Marco Niedergethmann; Niloufar Dusch; Rizky Widyaningsih; Christel Weiss; Peter Kienle; Stefan Post
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Pancreaticodigestive anastomosis and the postoperative management strategies to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula formation after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Daisuke Hashimoto; Akira Chikamoto; Masaki Ohmuraya; Masahiko Hirota; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Performing simple and safe dunking pancreaticojejunostomy using mattress sutures in pure laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Akihiro Cho; Hiroshi Yamamoto; Osamu Kainuma; Yorihiko Muto; Seonjin Park; Hidehito Arimitsu; Mamoru Sato; Hiroaki Souda; Atsushi Ikeda; Yoshihiro Nabeya; Nobuhiro Takiguchi; Matsuo Nagata
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Peng's binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a French prospective study.

Authors:  Emmanuel Buc; Renaud Flamein; Claudio Golffier; Anne Dubois; Ganesh Nagarajan; Emmanuel Futier; Denis Pezet
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.