Literature DB >> 19476061

[Is hardware removal a necessity?].

F Unno Veith1, A Lädermann, P Hoffmeyer.   

Abstract

Hardware removal should be decided only after careful examination of the medical and economic implications. Current literature fails to offer systematic guidelines. Infected hardware, non-union after surgery or obvious mechanical problems are straightforward indications for implant removal. However, when motivated by pain alone, the procedure can have disappointing results, and patients' expectations should be consequently moderated. Protection against toxicity, allergy, carcinogenesis or possible implant failure should not prompt systematic removal. Hardware removal in children should be considered separately, since metallic implants can interfere with normal growth patterns. Overall, implant removal should not be considered a routine procedure, and indications for surgery should reflect the thorough examination of the risks and the benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19476061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Med Suisse        ISSN: 1660-9379


  6 in total

1.  Implant removal in children.

Authors:  P P Schmittenbecher
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Indications for prophylactic osteosynthesis associated with curettage in benign and low-grade malignant primitive bone tumors of the distal femur in adult patients: a case series.

Authors:  Carlo Perisano; Carlo Barone; Daniele Stomeo; Giulio Di Giacomo; Michele Vasso; Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Giulio Maccauro
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-07-09

3.  Periprosthetic total knee fracture after remote reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a case report.

Authors:  Sahil Kooner; Eric Gibson; Marcia Clark
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2017-09-29

4.  Metal implant removal: benefits and drawbacks--a patient survey.

Authors:  Georg Reith; Vera Schmitz-Greven; Kai O Hensel; Marco M Schneider; Tibor Tinschmann; Bertil Bouillon; Christian Probst
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Complications during removal of stainless steel versus titanium nails used for intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal fractures of the tibia.

Authors:  Mustafa Seyhan; Olcay Guler; Mahir Mahirogullari; Ferdi Donmez; Arel Gereli; Serhat Mutlu
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-01-09

Review 6.  Elective removal vs. retaining of hardware after osteosynthesis in asymptomatic patients-a scoping review.

Authors:  Barbara Prediger; Tim Mathes; Christian Probst; Dawid Pieper
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-10-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.