Literature DB >> 19475933

Environmental comparison of biosolids management systems using life cycle assessment.

Gregory M Peters1, Hazel V Rowley.   

Abstract

To fill a gap in the information available to nonmetropolitan policy makers, eight scenarios combining processing technologies and end-uses for biosolids products associated with a 40,000 equivalent-person town were modeled using environmental life cycle assessment (LCA). An uncertainty analysis examined several key assumptions. The results showed that the reuse of biosolids products can be environmentally beneficial but transportation distances can change the preferences between technologies, and drying biosolids using petrochemical methane rather than biogas (produced endogenously in the wastewater facility) significantly worsens environmental performance. System scale can also invert option preferences. This work demonstrates an application of LCA to a strategic engineering question. We also examine the methodological feasibility of considering carbon sequestration and water offsets beyond those typical of previous studies. As the development of scientific data regarding the benefits of biosolids recycling develops,there may be potentialto reward agricultural businesses that choose to reduce their environmental burdens using biosolids. A life cycle management approach to this will be necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19475933     DOI: 10.1021/es802677t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

Review 1.  Utilization of urban sewage sludge: Chinese perspectives.

Authors:  H Chen; S-H Yan; Z-L Ye; H-J Meng; Y-G Zhu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Technical, hygiene, economic, and life cycle assessment of full-scale moving bed biofilm reactors for wastewater treatment in India.

Authors:  Anju Singh; Sheetal Jaisingh Kamble; Megha Sawant; Yogita Chakravarthy; Absar Kazmi; Enrique Aymerich; Markus Starkl; Makarand Ghangrekar; Ligy Philip
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Bioenergy and bioproducts from municipal organic waste as alternative to landfilling: a comparative life cycle assessment with prospective application to Mexico.

Authors:  Carlos Escamilla-Alvarado; Héctor M Poggi-Varaldo; M Teresa Ponce-Noyola
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Conducting an agricultural life cycle assessment: challenges and perspectives.

Authors:  Kevin R Caffrey; Matthew W Veal
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-12-10

5.  Toward net-zero sustainable aviation fuel with wet waste-derived volatile fatty acids.

Authors:  Nabila A Huq; Glenn R Hafenstine; Xiangchen Huo; Hannah Nguyen; Stephen M Tifft; Davis R Conklin; Daniela Stück; Jim Stunkel; Zhibin Yang; Joshua S Heyne; Matthew R Wiatrowski; Yimin Zhang; Ling Tao; Junqing Zhu; Charles S McEnally; Earl D Christensen; Cameron Hays; Kurt M Van Allsburg; Kinga A Unocic; Harry M Meyer; Zia Abdullah; Derek R Vardon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evolving wastewater infrastructure paradigm to enhance harmony with nature.

Authors:  Xu Wang; Glen Daigger; Duu-Jong Lee; Junxin Liu; Nan-Qi Ren; Jiuhui Qu; Gang Liu; David Butler
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 14.136

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.