OBJECTIVES: Many complications in the perioperative interval are associated with genetic susceptibilities that may be unknown in advance of surgery and anesthesia, including drug toxicity and inefficacy, thrombosis, prolonged neuromuscular blockade, organ failure and sepsis. The aims of this study were to design and validate the first genetic testing platform and panel designed for use in perioperative care, to establish allele frequencies in a target population, and to determine the number of mutant alleles per patient undergoing surgery. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty patients at Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin, 100 patients at the Medical College of Wisconsin Zablocki Veteran's Administration Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and 200 patients at the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin undergoing surgery and anesthesia were tested for 48 polymorphisms in 22 genes including ABC, BChE, ACE, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, beta2AR, TPMT, F2, F5, F7, MTHFR, TNFalpha, TNFbeta, CCR5, ApoE, HBB, MYH7, ABO and Gender (PRKY, PFKFB1). Using structure-specific cleavage of oligonucleotide probes (Invader, Third Wave Technologies, Inc., Madison, WI), 96-well plates were configured so that each well contained reagents for detection of both the wild type and mutant alleles at each locus. RESULTS: There were 21,600 genotypes confirmed in duplicate. After withdrawal of polymorphisms in non-pathogenic genes (i.e., the ABO blood group and gender-specific alleles), 376 of 450 patients were found to be homozygous for mutant alleles at one or more loci. Modes of two mutant homozygous loci and 10 mutant alleles in aggregate (i.e., the sum of homozygous and heterozygous mutant polymorphisms) were observed per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Significant genetic heterogeneity that may not be accounted for by taking a family medical history, or by obtaining routine laboratory test results, is present in most patients presenting for surgery and may be detected using a newly developed genotyping platform.
OBJECTIVES: Many complications in the perioperative interval are associated with genetic susceptibilities that may be unknown in advance of surgery and anesthesia, including drug toxicity and inefficacy, thrombosis, prolonged neuromuscular blockade, organ failure and sepsis. The aims of this study were to design and validate the first genetic testing platform and panel designed for use in perioperative care, to establish allele frequencies in a target population, and to determine the number of mutant alleles per patient undergoing surgery. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty patients at Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin, 100 patients at the Medical College of Wisconsin Zablocki Veteran's Administration Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and 200 patients at the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin undergoing surgery and anesthesia were tested for 48 polymorphisms in 22 genes including ABC, BChE, ACE, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, beta2AR, TPMT, F2, F5, F7, MTHFR, TNFalpha, TNFbeta, CCR5, ApoE, HBB, MYH7, ABO and Gender (PRKY, PFKFB1). Using structure-specific cleavage of oligonucleotide probes (Invader, Third Wave Technologies, Inc., Madison, WI), 96-well plates were configured so that each well contained reagents for detection of both the wild type and mutant alleles at each locus. RESULTS: There were 21,600 genotypes confirmed in duplicate. After withdrawal of polymorphisms in non-pathogenic genes (i.e., the ABO blood group and gender-specific alleles), 376 of 450 patients were found to be homozygous for mutant alleles at one or more loci. Modes of two mutant homozygous loci and 10 mutant alleles in aggregate (i.e., the sum of homozygous and heterozygous mutant polymorphisms) were observed per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Significant genetic heterogeneity that may not be accounted for by taking a family medical history, or by obtaining routine laboratory test results, is present in most patients presenting for surgery and may be detected using a newly developed genotyping platform.
Authors: Mohamad N Bittar; John A Carey; James B Barnard; Vera Pravica; Abdul K Deiraniya; Nizar Yonan; Ian V Hutchinson Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: E J Heyer; D A Wilson; D H Sahlein; J Mocco; S C Williams; R Sciacca; A Rampersad; R J Komotar; J Zurica; A Benvenisty; D O Quest; G Todd; R A Solomon; E S Connolly Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-10-05 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Michael A Hillman; Russell A Wilke; Steven H Yale; Humberto J Vidaillet; Michael D Caldwell; Ingrid Glurich; Richard L Berg; John Schmelzer; James K Burmester Journal: Clin Med Res Date: 2005-08
Authors: Andrew D Shaw; Ara A Vaporciyan; Xifeng Wu; Terri M King; Margaret R Spitz; Joe B Putnam; Burton F Dickey Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: I J Welsby; M V Podgoreanu; B Phillips-Bute; J P Mathew; P K Smith; M F Newman; D A Schwinn; M Stafford-Smith Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2005-05-09 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: Mark Stafford-Smith; Mihai Podgoreanu; Madhav Swaminathan; Barbara Phillips-Bute; Joseph P Mathew; Elizabeth H Hauser; Michelle P Winn; Carmelo Milano; Dahlia M Nielsen; Mike Smith; Richard Morris; Mark F Newman; Debra A Schwinn Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 8.860