Literature DB >> 19473387

Asymmetric mating preferences accommodated the rapid evolutionary loss of a sexual signal.

Robin M Tinghitella1, Marlene Zuk.   

Abstract

Rapid evolution has been well documented in naturally selected traits, but few examples exist for sexually selected traits, particularly sexual signals. This may in part be due to the complex set of behaviors associated with sexual signals. For a sexual signal to change, the change must be favorable for the signaler, but must also be accommodated by the receiver's perception and preferences. We investigated female accommodation of an extreme change in the sexual signal of Polynesian field crickets, Teleogryllus oceanicus. The cricket is native to Australia, widely distributed on Pacific Islands, and was recently introduced to Hawaii. Selective pressure by a deadly parasitoid fly favored a wing mutation in Hawaii (flatwing) that eliminates males' singing ability altogether. Despite conventional wisdom that females require males to produce a courtship song before mating, we show that females from ancestral, unparasitized Australian and Pacific Island populations as well as parasitized Hawaiian populations, will mate with silent flatwing males, suggesting this behavioral option predates the change in sexual signal. Furthermore, ancestral Australian females discriminate against flatwing males more severely than island females. We suggest island colonization favored females with relaxed mating requirements (Kaneshiro's effect) facilitating the rapid evolutionary loss of song in Hawaii.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19473387     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00698.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  9 in total

1.  Socially flexible female choice differs among populations of the Pacific field cricket: geographical variation in the interaction coefficient psi (Ψ).

Authors:  Nathan W Bailey; Marlene Zuk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Does signalling mitigate the cost of agonistic interactions? A test in a cricket that has lost its song.

Authors:  D M Logue; I O Abiola; D Rains; N W Bailey; M Zuk; W H Cade
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Genes versus phenotypes in the study of speciation.

Authors:  Kerry L Shaw; Sean P Mullen
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 4.  The dynamic relationship between polyandry and selfish genetic elements.

Authors:  Nina Wedell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The behavioral origins of novelty: did increased aggression lead to scale-eating in pupfishes?

Authors:  Michelle E St John; Joseph A McGirr; Christopher H Martin
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  Obligately silent males sire more offspring than singers in a rapidly evolving cricket population.

Authors:  Justa L Heinen-Kay; Ellen M Urquhart; Marlene Zuk
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Context matters: sexual signaling loss in digital organisms.

Authors:  Emily G Weigel; Nicholas D Testa; Alex Peer; Sara C Garnett
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  The evolutionary consequences of disrupted male mating signals: an agent-based modelling exploration of endocrine disrupting chemicals in the guppy.

Authors:  Alistair McNair Senior; Shinichi Nakagawa; Volker Grimm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication.

Authors:  Robin M Tinghitella; E Dale Broder; James H Gallagher; Aaron W Wikle; David M Zonana
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.