OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the expression of p16(INK4a) (referred as to p16) and Ki-67 in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and the correlation between high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and the above biomarkers. METHODS: We analyzed 31 patients who were diagnosed with CIN at Kwandong University Myongji Hospital from October 2006 to September 2007. CIN specimens (CIN1, 12; CIN2, 6; CIN3, 13) were obtained by colposcopy-directed biopsy (CDB) or loop electrical excision procedure (LEEP). The expressions of p16 and Ki-67 were evaluated by immunohistochemical methods with antibodies to p16 and Ki67. The immunohistochemical staining results were classified into four grades: 0, 1, 2 and 3. HPV genotyping or Hybrid Capture-II test was used to detect high-risk HPV. RESULTS: The expression of p16 (p<0.001) and Ki-67 (p=0.003) were positively associated with CIN grade. p16 expressions increased significantly with high-risk HPV infection (p=0.014), especially HPV type 16 and 58. Ki-67 expression was not related with high-risk HPV. There was positive correlation between the expression of the p16 and Ki-67 (p=0.007). CONCLUSION: CIN grade were positively related to the expression of p16 and Ki-67. p16 expressions of high-risk HPV specimens significantly increased more than Ki-67. Therefore, in the diagnosis of CIN and high-risk HPV infection, p16 can be a useful biomarker.
OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the expression of p16(INK4a) (referred as to p16) and Ki-67 in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and the correlation between high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and the above biomarkers. METHODS: We analyzed 31 patients who were diagnosed with CIN at Kwandong University Myongji Hospital from October 2006 to September 2007. CIN specimens (CIN1, 12; CIN2, 6; CIN3, 13) were obtained by colposcopy-directed biopsy (CDB) or loop electrical excision procedure (LEEP). The expressions of p16 and Ki-67 were evaluated by immunohistochemical methods with antibodies to p16 and Ki67. The immunohistochemical staining results were classified into four grades: 0, 1, 2 and 3. HPV genotyping or Hybrid Capture-II test was used to detect high-risk HPV. RESULTS: The expression of p16 (p<0.001) and Ki-67 (p=0.003) were positively associated with CIN grade. p16 expressions increased significantly with high-risk HPV infection (p=0.014), especially HPV type 16 and 58. Ki-67 expression was not related with high-risk HPV. There was positive correlation between the expression of the p16 and Ki-67 (p=0.007). CONCLUSION:CIN grade were positively related to the expression of p16 and Ki-67. p16 expressions of high-risk HPV specimens significantly increased more than Ki-67. Therefore, in the diagnosis of CIN and high-risk HPV infection, p16 can be a useful biomarker.
Authors: J T Keating; A Cviko; S Riethdorf; L Riethdorf; B J Quade; D Sun; S Duensing; E E Sheets; K Munger; C P Crum Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: R J Slebos; M H Lee; B S Plunkett; T D Kessis; B O Williams; T Jacks; L Hedrick; M B Kastan; K R Cho Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1994-06-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: F X Bosch; M M Manos; N Muñoz; M Sherman; A M Jansen; J Peto; M H Schiffman; V Moreno; R Kurman; K V Shah Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1995-06-07 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Sophia S Wang; Marcus Trunk; Mark Schiffman; Rolando Herrero; Mark E Sherman; Robert D Burk; Allan Hildesheim; M Concepcion Bratti; Tom Wright; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Sabrina Chen; Anja Reichert; Christina von Knebel Doeberitz; Ruediger Ridder; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: C E Wood; S H Tannehill-Gregg; Z Chen; K van Doorslaer; D R Nelson; J M Cline; R D Burk Journal: Vet Pathol Date: 2010-10-04 Impact factor: 2.221
Authors: Romy van Baars; Heather Griffin; Zhonglin Wu; Yasmina Jay Soneji; Miekel van de Sandt; Rupali Arora; Jacolien van der Marel; Bram Ter Harmsel; Robert Jach; Krzysztof Okon; Hubert Huras; David Jenkins; Wim Quint; John Doorbar Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Marilia Freitas Calmon; Mânlio Tasso de Oliveira Mota; Érica Babeto; Natália Maria Candido; Ana Paula Girol; Carlos Fabian Mendiburu; Jane Lopes Bonilha; Rodrigo Vellasco Duarte Silvestre; Bruno Miziara Rosa; Jorge Alberto Thomé; Gustavo Hernandez Américo Medeiros; Fernando Augusto Soares; Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães; José Germano Ferraz de Arruda; Sonia Maria Oliani; Luisa Lina Villa; José Vassallo; Paula Rahal Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anthony Mwololo; Joshua Nyagol; Emily Rogena; Willis Ochuk; Mary Kimani; Noel Onyango; Lorenzo Pacenti; Rosa Santopietro; Lorenzo Leoncini; Walter Mwanda Journal: Infect Agent Cancer Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 2.965