Literature DB >> 26379150

Investigating Diagnostic Problems of CIN1 and CIN2 Associated With High-risk HPV by Combining the Novel Molecular Biomarker PanHPVE4 With P16INK4a.

Romy van Baars1, Heather Griffin2,3, Zhonglin Wu3, Yasmina Jay Soneji3, Miekel van de Sandt1, Rupali Arora4, Jacolien van der Marel1, Bram Ter Harmsel5, Robert Jach6, Krzysztof Okon6, Hubert Huras6, David Jenkins1, Wim Quint1, John Doorbar2,3.   

Abstract

Grading cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) determines clinical management of women after abnormal cytology with potential for overdiagnosis and overtreatment. We studied a novel biomarker of human papillomavirus (HPV) life-cycle completion (panHPVE4), in combination with the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) protein cell-cycle marker and the p16INK4a transformation marker, to improve CIN diagnosis and categorization. Scoring these biomarkers alongside CIN grading by 3 pathologists was performed on 114 cervical specimens with high-risk (HR) HPV. Interobserver agreement for histopathology was moderate (κ=0.43 for CIN1/negative, 0.54 for CIN2/≤CIN1, and 0.36 for CIN3). Agreement was good or excellent for biomarker scoring (E4: κ=0.896; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.763-0.969; p16INK4a : κ=0.798; 95% CI: 0.712-0.884; MCM: κ=0.894; 95% CI: NC (this quantity cannot be calculated). Biomarker expression was studied by immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry and was correlated with 104 final CIN diagnoses after histologic review. All 25 histologically negative specimens were p16INK4a and panHPVE4 negative, although 9 were MCM-positive. There were variable extents of p16INK4a positivity in 11/11 CIN1 and extensive panHPVE4 staining in 9/11. Ten CIN2 lesions expressed panHPVE4 and p16INK4a, and 13 CIN2 expressed only p16INK4a. CIN3 showed extensive p16INK4a positivity with no/minimal panHPVE4 staining. PanHPVE4, unlike MCM, distinguished CIN1 from negative. PanHPVE4 with p16INK4a separated CIN2/3 showing only expression of p16INK4a, indicating transforming HR-HPV E7 expression, from CIN1/2 showing completion of HR-HPV life cycle by E4 expression and variable p16INK4a expression. PanHPVE4 and p16INK4a staining are complementary markers that could provide simple, reliable support for diagnosing CIN. Their value in distinguishing CIN1/2 that supports HR-HPV life-cycle completion (and which might ultimately regress) from purely transforming CIN2/3 needing treatment warrants further research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26379150      PMCID: PMC4604656          DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  54 in total

1.  Accumulation of RNA homologous to human papillomavirus type 16 open reading frames in genital precancers.

Authors:  C P Crum; G Nuovo; D Friedman; S J Silverstein
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Characterization of events during the late stages of HPV16 infection in vivo using high-affinity synthetic Fabs to E4.

Authors:  J Doorbar; C Foo; N Coleman; L Medcalf; O Hartley; T Prospero; S Napthine; J Sterling; G Winter; H Griffin
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1997-11-10       Impact factor: 3.616

3.  Development and clinical evaluation of a highly sensitive PCR-reverse hybridization line probe assay for detection and identification of anogenital human papillomavirus.

Authors:  B Kleter; L J van Doorn; L Schrauwen; A Molijn; S Sastrowijoto; J ter Schegget; J Lindeman; B ter Harmsel; M Burger; W Quint
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Minichromosome maintenance proteins as biological markers of dysplasia and malignancy.

Authors:  A Freeman; L S Morris; A D Mills; K Stoeber; R A Laskey; G H Williams; N Coleman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  MCM proteins as diagnostic and prognostic tumor markers in the clinical setting.

Authors:  Constantinos Giaginis; Stephanie Vgenopoulou; Philippe Vielh; Stamatios Theocharis
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  The protein levels of MCM7 and p63 in evaluating lesion severity of cervical disease.

Authors:  Jiawen Zhang; Li Wang; Min Qiu; Zhiqiang Liu; Wenyan Qian; Yongbin Yang; Sufang Wu; Youji Feng
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 7.  The clinical impact of using p16(INK4a) immunochemistry in cervical histopathology and cytology: an update of recent developments.

Authors:  Christine Bergeron; Guglielmo Ronco; Miriam Reuschenbach; Nicolas Wentzensen; Marc Arbyn; Mark Stoler; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV 16) gene expression and DNA replication in cervical neoplasia: analysis by in situ hybridization.

Authors:  M Dürst; D Glitz; A Schneider; H zur Hausen
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.616

9.  Minichromosome maintenance (Mcm) proteins, cyclin B1 and D1, phosphohistone H3 and in situ DNA replication for functional analysis of vulval intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  E J Davidson; L S Morris; I S Scott; S M Rushbrook; K Bird; R A Laskey; G E Wilson; H C Kitchener; N Coleman; P L Stern
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  p16(INK4a) immunohistochemistry is a promising biomarker to predict the outcome of low grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: comparison study with HPV genotyping.

Authors:  Sakiko Nishio; Takuma Fujii; Hiroshi Nishio; Kaori Kameyama; Miyuki Saito; Takashi Iwata; Kaneyuki Kubushiro; Daisuke Aoki
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.401

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  [Modern biomarkers for precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix : Histological-cytological correlation and use].

Authors:  D Schmidt
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Performance of HPV E4 and p16INK4a biomarkers in predicting regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2): protocol for a historical cohort study.

Authors:  Rikke Kamp Damgaard; David Jenkins; Maurits Nc de Koning; Wim Gv Quint; Mark H Stoler; John Doorbar; Johnny Kahlert; Patti E Gravitt; Torben Steiniche; Lone Kjeld Petersen; Anne Hammer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Classification of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by p16ink4a , Ki-67, HPV E4 and FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation status demonstrates considerable heterogeneity with potential consequences for management.

Authors:  Frederique J Vink; Stèfanie Dick; Daniëlle A M Heideman; Lise M A De Strooper; Renske D M Steenbergen; Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte; Arno Floore; Jesper H Bonde; Anja Oštrbenk Valenčak; Mario Poljak; Karl U Petry; Peter Hillemanns; Nienke E van Trommel; Johannes Berkhof; Maaike C G Bleeker; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 4.  HPV disease transmission protection and control.

Authors:  Neil D Christensen
Journal:  Microb Cell       Date:  2016-09-05

5.  Risk stratification of cervical disease using detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) E4 protein and cellular MCM protein in clinical liquid based cytology samples.

Authors:  Andrew Stevenson; Kim Kavanagh; Jiafeng Pan; Lynne Stevenson; Heather Griffin; John Doorbar; Evelyn Scott; Miriam Deeny; Kate Cuschieri; Sheila V Graham
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 3.168

6.  Whole tissue cervical mapping of HPV infection: Molecular evidence for focal latent HPV infection in humans.

Authors:  Anne Hammer; Maurits Nc de Koning; Jan Blaakaer; Torben Steiniche; John Doorbar; Heather Griffin; Else Mejlgaard; Hans Svanholm; Wim Gv Quint; Patti E Gravitt
Journal:  Papillomavirus Res       Date:  2019-02-14

7.  Grading immunohistochemical markers p16INK4a and HPV E4 identifies productive and transforming lesions caused by low- and high-risk HPV within high-grade anal squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  A Leeman; D Jenkins; E Marra; M van Zummeren; E C Pirog; M M van de Sandt; A van Eeden; M F Schim van der Loeff; J Doorbar; H J C de Vries; F J van Kemenade; C J L M Meijer; W G V Quint
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 9.302

8.  Expression of p16 and HPV E4 on biopsy samples and methylation of FAM19A4 and miR124-2 on cervical cytology samples in the classification of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  Annemiek Leeman; David Jenkins; Marta Del Pino; Jaume Ordi; Aureli Torné; John Doorbar; Chris J L M Meijer; Folkert J van Kemenade; Wim G V Quint
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Assessment of p16 and Ki67 Immunohistochemistry Expression in Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion with Cytohistomorphological Correlation.

Authors:  Apurv Ghosh; Nirupama M; Nandan Padmanabha; Hema Kini
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2020-07-16

10.  Three-tiered score for Ki-67 and p16ink4a improves accuracy and reproducibility of grading CIN lesions.

Authors:  Annemiek Leeman; Wieke W Kremer; Marjolein van Zummeren; Maaike C G Bleeker; David Jenkins; Miekel van de Sandt; Daniëlle A M Heideman; Renske Steenbergen; Peter J F Snijders; Wim G V Quint; Johannes Berkhof; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.