OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the current practice of emergency physician-performed bedside ultrasound examinations in California and to assess differences between academic and community practice. METHODS: We queried all emergency departments (EDs) in California to determine whether bedside ultrasound was used by emergency physicians. Among EDs that were using bedside ultrasound, we administered a survey to assess use patterns, credentialing criteria, and quality assurance (QA) programs. RESULTS: We contacted all eligible EDs (n = 293) by telephone and had a 100% response rate for our primary question: 101 EDs (34%) reported use of bedside ultrasound. Of these 101 EDs, 97 (96%) responded to the secondary survey, showing the following: (1) 48% of physicians at each site were credentialed to use ultrasound in at least 1 modality; (2) 70% of EDs used American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) criteria for credentialing guidelines; and (3) 33% had an ultrasound QA program. Comparing practice settings, 68% of academic departments used bedside ultrasound compared with 29% of community departments (difference, 39%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 23% to 54%; P < .0001). In academic departments, a mean of 60% of physicians were credentialed, compared with 41% in community EDs (difference, 19%; 95% CI, 2.5% to 35%; P = .036). CONCLUSIONS: Most California EDs do not use bedside ultrasound. Although most EDs using ultrasound report that they follow ACEP emergency ultrasound guidelines, most do not have a QA program as recommended by these guidelines. Compared with community EDs, academic EDs are more likely to use bedside ultrasound, have physicians credentialed in ultrasound use, and have QA programs.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the current practice of emergency physician-performed bedside ultrasound examinations in California and to assess differences between academic and community practice. METHODS: We queried all emergency departments (EDs) in California to determine whether bedside ultrasound was used by emergency physicians. Among EDs that were using bedside ultrasound, we administered a survey to assess use patterns, credentialing criteria, and quality assurance (QA) programs. RESULTS: We contacted all eligible EDs (n = 293) by telephone and had a 100% response rate for our primary question: 101 EDs (34%) reported use of bedside ultrasound. Of these 101 EDs, 97 (96%) responded to the secondary survey, showing the following: (1) 48% of physicians at each site were credentialed to use ultrasound in at least 1 modality; (2) 70% of EDs used American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) criteria for credentialing guidelines; and (3) 33% had an ultrasound QA program. Comparing practice settings, 68% of academic departments used bedside ultrasound compared with 29% of community departments (difference, 39%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 23% to 54%; P < .0001). In academic departments, a mean of 60% of physicians were credentialed, compared with 41% in community EDs (difference, 19%; 95% CI, 2.5% to 35%; P = .036). CONCLUSIONS: Most California EDs do not use bedside ultrasound. Although most EDs using ultrasound report that they follow ACEP emergency ultrasound guidelines, most do not have a QA program as recommended by these guidelines. Compared with community EDs, academic EDs are more likely to use bedside ultrasound, have physicians credentialed in ultrasound use, and have QA programs.
Authors: Sarah K Kennedy; Robinson M Ferre; Loren K Rood; Benjamin Nti; Robert R Ehrman; Daniel Brenner; Matt A Rutz; Greg S Zahn; Audrey G Herbert; Frances M Russell Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2022-04-01
Authors: Pierre Léger; Richard Fleet; Julie Maltais-Giguère; Jeff Plant; Éric Piette; France Légaré; Julien Poitras Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2015-12-11