Literature DB >> 19469018

Dynamic wavefront aberrations and visual acuity in normal and dry eyes.

Yan Wang1, Jianjiang Xu, Xinghuai Sun, Renyuan Chu, Hong Zhuang, Ji C He.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim was to study the dynamic properties of wavefront aberrations and visual acuity in normal and dry eyes.
METHODS: Thirty dry-eye patients and 27 normal subjects participated in this study. Multi-file mode of a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor was used to measure dynamic wavefront aberrations for a period of 45 seconds. Dynamic measurements of visual acuity (VA) were made for 150 seconds using a multi-functional VA tester. Standard deviation of the measurements (RMS or VA) over the testing period was used to estimate instability of the dynamic wavefront aberration and VA.
RESULTS: For most subjects, both wavefront aberration and VA changed over time and the instability varied substantially among individuals. Blink-dependent fluctuation in wavefront aberration or VA was observed for some dry-eye subjects. On average, the dry-eye group had greater instability than the normal group in either the higher order wavefront aberrations (t = 2.09, p = 0.03, for OD; t = 3.76, p = 0.001, for OS) or the VA (t = 2.09,p = 0.02, for OD; t = 204, p = 0.03, for OS). Instability of VA in the dry-eye group was significantly correlated with blink rate (r = 0.28, p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Dynamic changes in wavefront aberrations and VA are highly individual dependent, while the dry eye tends to be less stable than the normal eye. The results suggest that tear-film fluctuation might play a role in determining dynamic wavefront aberration and VA; however, contributions from other factors should not be overlooked. For dry eye, dynamic change in VA depends on blink rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19469018     DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2009.00354.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Optom        ISSN: 0816-4622            Impact factor:   2.742


  16 in total

1.  Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Harold E Bedell; Yue Shi; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Higher order aberrations of the corneal surface after laser subepithelial keratomileusis.

Authors:  Hyun Ho Jung; Yong Sok Ji; Han Jin Oh; Kyung Chul Yoon
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-22

3.  Contrast visual acuity after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: aspheric versus spherical design.

Authors:  Jun-Hua Li; Yi-Fan Feng; Yun-E Zhao; Yin-Ying Zhao; Lei Lin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Data quality and clinical decision-making: do we trust machines blindly?

Authors:  Konrad Pesudovs; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Comparison of the femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for flap cutting in LASIK.

Authors:  Li-Kun Xia; Jie Yu; Guang-Rui Chai; Dang Wang; Yang Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Three-year results of small incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of high myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Li-Kun Xia; Jing Ma; He-Nan Liu; Ce Shi; Qing Huang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Forward light scatter analysis of the eye in a spatially-resolved double-pass optical system.

Authors:  Jayoung Nam; Larry N Thibos; Arthur Bradley; Nikole Himebaugh; Haixia Liu
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Changes of Corneal Wavefront Aberrations in Dry Eye Patients after Treatment with Artificial Lubricant Drops.

Authors:  Ning Lu; Fangyu Lin; Zhu Huang; Qin He; Wei Han
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Evaluation of anterior segment parameters and possible influencing factors in normal subjects using a dual Scheimpflug analyzer.

Authors:  Xiaogang Wang; Jing Dong; Qiang Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effect of Oral Re-esterified Omega-3 Nutritional Supplementation on Dry Eyes.

Authors:  Alice T Epitropoulos; Eric D Donnenfeld; Zubin A Shah; Edward J Holland; Michael Gross; William J Faulkner; Cynthia Matossian; Stephen S Lane; Melissa Toyos; Frank A Bucci; Henry D Perry
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.651

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.