Literature DB >> 19466737

Volume- or outcome-based referral to improve quality of care for esophageal cancer surgery in The Netherlands.

M W J M Wouters1, P Krijnen, S Le Cessie, G A Gooiker, O R Guicherit, A W K S Marinelli, J Kievit, R A E M Tollenaar.   

Abstract

Recently, in The Netherlands esophageal resections for cancer are banned from hospitals with an annual volume less than 10. In this study we evaluate the validity of this specific volume cut-off, based on a review of the literature and an analysis of the available data on esophagectomies in our country. In addition, we compare the expected benefits of volume-based referral to the results of a regional centralization process based on differences in outcome (outcome-based referral).

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19466737     DOI： 10.1002/jso.21191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN： 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  10 in total

Review 1.  Quality Management and Key Performance Indicators in Oncologic Esophageal Surgery.

Authors:  Ines Gockel; Constantin Johannes Ahlbrand; Michael Arras; Elke Maria Schreiber; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Is There a Rationale for Structural Quality Assurance in Esophageal Surgery?

Authors:  Torben Glatz; Jens Höppner
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-03-24

3.  Allogenic Blood Transfusion is Associated with Poor Perioperative and Long-Term Outcome in Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Reeh; Tarik Ghadban; Josephine Dedow; Eik Vettorazzi; Faik G Uzunoglu; Michael Nentwich; Stefan Kluge; Jakob R Izbicki; Yogesh K Vashist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies.

Authors:  Kfir Ben-David; George A Sarosi; Juan C Cendan; Drew Howard; Georgios Rossidis; Steven N Hochwald
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Re-examining the significance of surgical volume to breast cancer survival and recurrence versus process quality of care in Taiwan.

Authors:  Raymond N Kuo; Kuo-Piao Chung; Mei-Shu Lai
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Patients' Preferences for Surgical Management of Esophageal Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Eva J Niers; J Jan B van Lanschot; Ewout W Steyerberg; Bas P L Wijnhoven
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Minimum volume standards in German hospitals: do they get along with procedure centralization? A retrospective longitudinal data analysis.

Authors:  Werner de Cruppé; Marc Malik; Max Geraedts
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Oesophagectomy rates and post-resection outcomes in patients with cancer of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction: a population-based study using linked health administrative linked data.

Authors:  Efty P Stavrou; Robyn Ward; Sallie-Anne Pearson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  A combined measure of procedural volume and outcome to assess hospital quality of colorectal cancer surgery, a secondary analysis of clinical audit data.

Authors:  Nikki E Kolfschoten; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen; Michel W J M Wouters; Eric-Hans Eddes; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Theo Stijnen; Job Kievit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An international survey on anastomotic stricture management after esophageal atresia repair: considerations and advisory statements.

Authors:  Chantal A Ten Kate; Renato Tambucci; John Vlot; Manon C W Spaander; Frederic Gottrand; Rene M H Wijnen; Luigi Dall'Oglio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.