Literature DB >> 1946420

Evolution of compensatory substitutions through G.U intermediate state in Drosophila rRNA.

F Rousset1, M Pélandakis, M Solignac.   

Abstract

It has often been suggested that the frequently observed Watson-Crick base-pair compensatory substitutions in RNA helical structures occur mainly through a slightly deleterious G.U intermediate state. We have scored base substitutions in a set of 82 related Drosophila species for the D1 and D2 variable domains of the large rRNA subunit. In all locations where a G-C in equilibrium with A-U compensatory base change occurred, a G.U pair has been observed in one or several species. As this dominant process implies two transitions, their rate was far higher in paired regions (92%) than in unpaired regions (47%). The other types of compensation were rarer and no intermediate states were observed. Most of the G.U base pairs observed in a species are not slightly deleterious. The rate of evolution of compensatory substitution is close to that predicted by a simple model of compensatory substitution through slightly deleterious or slightly advantageous G.U pairs, although some exceptions are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1946420      PMCID: PMC52861          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.22.10032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population.

Authors:  M KIMURA
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Import of proteins into mitochondria: precursor forms of the extramitochondrially made F1-ATPase subunits in yeast.

Authors:  M L Maccecchini; Y Rudin; G Blobel; G Schatz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Rapid chemical probing of conformation in 16 S ribosomal RNA and 30 S ribosomal subunits using primer extension.

Authors:  D Moazed; S Stern; H F Noller
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1986-02-05       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Evolution of transfer RNA.

Authors:  R Holmquist; T H Jukes; S Pangburn
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1973-06-25       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information.

Authors:  M Zuker; P Stiegler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1981-01-10       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Improved methods for structure probing in large RNAs: a rapid 'heterologous' sequencing approach is coupled to the direct mapping of nuclease accessible sites. Application to the 5' terminal domain of eukaryotic 28S rRNA.

Authors:  H L Qu; B Michot; J P Bachellerie
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1983-09-10       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Secondary structure of mouse 28S rRNA and general model for the folding of the large rRNA in eukaryotes.

Authors:  B Michot; N Hassouna; J P Bachellerie
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1984-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Detailed analysis of the higher-order structure of 16S-like ribosomal ribonucleic acids.

Authors:  C R Woese; R Gutell; R Gupta; H F Noller
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1983-12

9.  Molecular evolution in Drosophila and the higher Diptera II. A time scale for fly evolution.

Authors:  S M Beverley; A C Wilson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  New reactions of the ribosomal RNA precursor of Tetrahymena and the mechanism of self-splicing.

Authors:  T Inoue; F X Sullivan; T R Cech
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1986-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  42 in total

1.  RNA sequence evolution with secondary structure constraints: comparison of substitution rate models using maximum-likelihood methods.

Authors:  N J Savill; D C Hoyle; P G Higgs
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  On the wobble GoU and related pairs.

Authors:  B Masquida; E Westhof
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 3.  Coupled nucleotide covariations reveal dynamic RNA interaction patterns.

Authors:  A P Gultyaev; T Franch; K Gerdes
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 4.  Disease-related versus polymorphic mutations in human mitochondrial tRNAs. Where is the difference?

Authors:  C Florentz; M Sissler
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  NCIR: a database of non-canonical interactions in known RNA structures.

Authors:  Uma Nagaswamy; Maia Larios-Sanz; James Hury; Shakaala Collins; Zhengdong Zhang; Qin Zhao; George E Fox
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Selection intensity against deleterious mutations in RNA secondary structures and rate of compensatory nucleotide substitutions.

Authors:  H Innan; W Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Predicted secondary structure for 28S and 18S rRNA from Ichneumonoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Apocrita): impact on sequence alignment and phylogeny estimation.

Authors:  Joseph J Gillespie; Matthew J Yoder; Robert A Wharton
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Uncoupling RNA virus replication from transcription via the polymerase: functional and evolutionary insights.

Authors:  Baodong Wu; K Andrew White
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Molecular phylogeny of the subgenus Sophophora of Drosophila derived from large subunit of ribosomal RNA sequences.

Authors:  M Pélandakis; D G Higgins; M Solignac
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Phylogeny of Drosophila and related genera inferred from the nucleotide sequence of the Cu,Zn Sod gene.

Authors:  J Kwiatowski; D Skarecky; K Bailey; F J Ayala
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.