Literature DB >> 1946366

A genomic scanning method for higher organisms using restriction sites as landmarks.

I Hatada1, Y Hayashizaki, S Hirotsune, H Komatsubara, T Mukai.   

Abstract

We have developed a powerful genomic scanning method, termed "restriction landmark genomic scanning," that is useful for analysis of the genomic DNA of higher organisms using restriction sites as landmarks. Genomic DNA is radioactively labeled at cleavage sites specific for a rare cleaving restriction enzyme and then size-fractionated in one dimension. The fractionated DNA is further digested with another more frequently occurring enzyme and separated in the second dimension. This procedure gives a two-dimensional pattern with thousands of scattered spots corresponding to sites for the first enzyme, indicating that the genome of mammals can be scanned at approximately 1-megabase intervals. The position and intensity of a spot reflect its locus and the copy number of the corresponding restriction site, respectively, based on the nature of the end-labeling system. Therefore, this method is widely applicable to genome mapping or detection of alterations in a genome.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1946366      PMCID: PMC52750          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

1.  Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  E M Southern
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1975-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  A general method for isolation of high molecular weight DNA from eukaryotes.

Authors:  N Blin; D W Stafford
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Two-dimensional DNA fingerprinting of human individuals.

Authors:  A G Uitterlinden; P E Slagboom; D L Knook; J Vijg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Genetic analysis of the mouse using interspecific crosses.

Authors:  P Avner; L Amar; L Dandolo; J L Guénet
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  The QUEST system for quantitative analysis of two-dimensional gels.

Authors:  J I Garrels
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1989-03-25       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Rare bases in animal DNA.

Authors:  B F Vanyushin; S G Tkacheva; A N Belozersky
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Direct molecular identification of the mouse pink-eyed unstable mutation by genome scanning.

Authors:  M H Brilliant; Y Gondo; E M Eicher
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-04-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Chlorambucil effectively induces deletion mutations in mouse germ cells.

Authors:  L B Russell; P R Hunsicker; N L Cacheiro; J W Bangham; W L Russell; M D Shelby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Cloning of DNA sequences from the white locus of D. melanogaster by a novel and general method.

Authors:  P M Bingham; R Levis; G M Rubin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 41.582

  9 in total
  62 in total

1.  Analysis of human peripheral blood T cells and single-cell-derived T cell clones uncovers extensive clonal CpG island methylation heterogeneity throughout the genome.

Authors:  X Zhu; C Deng; R Kuick; R Yung; B Lamb; J V Neel; B Richardson; S Hanash
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Virtual genome scan: a tool for restriction landmark-based scanning of the human genome.

Authors:  J M Rouillard; A E Erson; R Kuick; J Asakawa ; K Wimmer; M Muleris; E M Petty; S Hanash
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 3.  Identification of driver and passenger DNA methylation in cancer by epigenomic analysis.

Authors:  Satish Kalari; Gerd P Pfeifer
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.944

4.  Hypermethylation of CpG islands is more prevalent than hypomethylation across the entire genome in breast carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Jianxin Tan; Yumei Gu; Xiaomei Zhang; Sihong You; Xiaowei Lu; Senqing Chen; Xiao Han; Yujie Sun
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.984

5.  Genomic alterations in human glioma cell lines detected by restriction landmark genomic scanning.

Authors:  M Nakamura; N Konishi; S Tsunoda; Y Hiasa; T Tsuzuki; K Takemura; K Kobitsu; T Sakaki
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Association of tissue-specific differentially methylated regions (TDMs) with differential gene expression.

Authors:  Fei Song; Joseph F Smith; Makoto T Kimura; Arlene D Morrow; Tomoki Matsuyama; Hiroki Nagase; William A Held
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Epigenome scans and cancer genome sequencing converge on WNK2, a kinase-independent suppressor of cell growth.

Authors:  Chibo Hong; K Scott Moorefield; Peter Jun; Kenneth D Aldape; Samir Kharbanda; Heidi S Phillips; Joseph F Costello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Mapping the mouse genome: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  W F Dietrich; N G Copeland; D J Gilbert; J C Miller; N A Jenkins; E S Lander
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Tissue specific differentially methylated regions (TDMR): Changes in DNA methylation during development.

Authors:  Fei Song; Saleh Mahmood; Srimoyee Ghosh; Ping Liang; Domminic J Smiraglia; Hiroki Nagase; William A Held
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 5.736

10.  A novel role for mitochondria in regulating epigenetic modification in the nucleus.

Authors:  Dominic J Smiraglia; Mariola Kulawiec; Gaia L Bistulfi; Sampa Ghoshal Gupta; Keshav K Singh
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.