Literature DB >> 12719164

Electrical treatment of tibial non-union: a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial.

R B Simonis1, E J Parnell, P S Ray, J L Peacock.   

Abstract

Electrical stimulation in the treatment of bony non-union has been used in different forms for many years. However, there is still a lot of uncertainty about its efficacy. We, therefore, undertook a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial to try and determine its effect. Over a period of 5 years, 34 consecutive patients with a tibial non-union met our "criteria for inclusion". Each patient had an oblique fibular osteotomy, followed by a unilateral external fixator. They were then randomly allocated one of two machines. Group 1, the active group, received electrical stimulation from an active machine. Group 2, the dummy group, had an identical machine but without any current passing through the active coils. They were then followed up for 6 months and evaluated clinically and radiologically for bony union. Unfortunately, there was by chance, an imbalance in smoking habit between the two groups. The union rate in the subgroup that smoked was 75% (6/8) in the active group as compared to 46% (6/13) in the dummy group. The active group of non-smokers had 100% (10/10) union rate, compared to 67% (2/3) in the dummy group. Overall 24 out of the 34 patients progressed to union. Out of 18, 16 (89%) in the active group showed bony union as compared to 8/16 (50%) in the dummy. There was, thus, a statistically significant positive association between tibial union and electrical stimulation (odds ratio 8, 95% CI: 1.5-41, P=0.02).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12719164     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(02)00209-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  24 in total

Review 1.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2006.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Angiogenesis in bone regeneration.

Authors:  Kurt D Hankenson; Michael Dishowitz; Chancellor Gray; Mara Schenker
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 3.  Low-intensity pulsed ultrasonography versus electrical stimulation for fracture healing: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shanil Ebrahim; Brent Mollon; Sheena Bance; Jason W Busse; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 4.  Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?

Authors:  Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; Zhihua Han; Thomas DeCoster; Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; John H Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Update on stress fractures in female athletes: epidemiology, treatment, and prevention.

Authors:  Yin-Ting Chen; Adam S Tenforde; Michael Fredericson
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-06

Review 6.  Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and pulsed electromagnetic field in the treatment of tibial fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicol A Walker; Craig R Denegar; Jody Preische
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Comparative study of the use of electromagnetic fields in patients with pseudoarthrosis of tibia treated by intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Juan L Cebrián; Pilar Gallego; Alberto Francés; Piedad Sánchez; Elena Manrique; Fernando Marco; Luis López-Durán
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields for the treatment of tibial delayed unions and nonunions. A prospective clinical study and review of the literature.

Authors:  Aggelos Assiotis; Nick P Sachinis; Byron E Chalidis
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Pulsed electromagnetic stimulation in nonunion of tibial diaphyseal fractures.

Authors:  Anil Kumar Gupta; Kailash Prasad Srivastava; Sachin Avasthi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Tissue engineered strategies for pseudoarthrosis.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Ugo Trovato; Mattia Loppini; Giacomo Rizzello; Wasim Sardar Khan; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.