Literature DB >> 19460831

Are end-of-life patient education materials readable?

K A Ache1, L S Wallace.   

Abstract

Although established guidelines for developing low-literacy patient education materials are available, poorly designed material continue to be disseminated. We evaluated the readability and layout of English-language end-of-life patient education materials available on the Internet. Internet websites of five national palliative care organizations were searched to identify patient education materials for review. A convenience sample of 15 patient education materials per palliative care organization (n = 75) was downloaded and printed. The Simplified Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) was used to calculate the reading grade level (readability) of the text, while the layout features was assessed using criteria from the User-Friendliness Tool (UFT). The reading grade level of patient education materials ranged from 7(th) to 12(th) grade (mean +/- SD = 11.1 +/- 1.9). None of the patient education materials scored high on all UFT criteria. In particular, the greatest need was increasing the amount of white space and improving the way in which information was organized visually. Healthcare providers can only aid in the decision process, patients and their loved ones are ultimately responsible for making these choices. These decisions are important as choices need to be made about end-of-life care while patients are still cognitively able to do so. Well designed end-of-life patient education materials can offer a wealth of knowledge to assist and guide decision making. On the basis of these results, end-of-life patient education materials should be revised so that the average adult is able to understand the message presented, thereby enhancing his/her ability to make informed decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19460831     DOI: 10.1177/0269216309106313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  5 in total

1.  Readability of patient education materials available at the point of care.

Authors:  Lauren M Stossel; Nora Segar; Peter Gliatto; Robert Fallar; Reena Karani
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Readability and content of patient education material related to implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Patricia H Strachan; Sonya de Laat; Sandra L Carroll; Lisa Schwartz; Katie Vaandering; Gurjit K Toor; Heather M Arthur
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Readability of hospice materials to prepare families for caregiving at the time of death.

Authors:  Karen A Kehl; Kayla N McCarty
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 4.  Lost in translation: the unintended consequences of advance directive law on clinical care.

Authors:  Lesley S Castillo; Brie A Williams; Sarah M Hooper; Charles P Sabatino; Lois A Weithorn; Rebecca L Sudore
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  Disparities in Palliative and Hospice Care and Completion of Advance Care Planning and Directives Among Non-Hispanic Blacks: A Scoping Review of Recent Literature.

Authors:  Mohsen Bazargan; Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 2.500

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.