PURPOSE: Cytogenetic abnormalities are currently the most important predictors of response and clinical outcome for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or advanced-stage myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Because clinical outcomes vary markedly within cytogenetic subgroups, additional biological markers are needed for risk stratification. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We assessed the utility of measuring pretreatment proteasome chymotrypsin-like, caspase-like, and trypsin-like activities in plasma to predict response and survival of patients with AML (n = 174) or advanced-stage MDS (n = 52). RESULTS: All three enzymatic activities were significantly (P < 0.001) increased in the plasma of patients with AML and MDS compared with normal controls. Both chymotrypsin-like and caspase-like activities, but not trypsin-like activity, correlated with outcome. Chymotrypsin-like and caspase-like activities, but not trypsin-like activity, predicted response in univariate analysis (P = 0.002). However, only chymotrypsin-like activity was independent predictor of response from age grouping (<70 versus > or =70 years), cytogenetics, and blood urea nitrogen in multivariate analysis. Similarly, both chymotrypsin-like and caspase-like activities, but not trypsin-like activity, were predictors of overall survival in univariate analysis (P < 0.0001), but only chymotrypsin-like activity was independent of cytogenetics, age, performance status, blood urea nitrogen, and beta(2)-microglobulin in multivariate Cox regression models. Chymotrypsin-like activity was also a strong independent predictor of survival in patients with intermediate karyotype (n = 124). CONCLUSIONS: Measuring plasma chymotrypsin-like activity may provide a powerful biomarker for risk stratification in patients with AML and advanced-stage MDS, including those with normal karyotype.
PURPOSE: Cytogenetic abnormalities are currently the most important predictors of response and clinical outcome for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or advanced-stage myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Because clinical outcomes vary markedly within cytogenetic subgroups, additional biological markers are needed for risk stratification. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We assessed the utility of measuring pretreatment proteasome chymotrypsin-like, caspase-like, and trypsin-like activities in plasma to predict response and survival of patients with AML (n = 174) or advanced-stage MDS (n = 52). RESULTS: All three enzymatic activities were significantly (P < 0.001) increased in the plasma of patients with AML and MDS compared with normal controls. Both chymotrypsin-like and caspase-like activities, but not trypsin-like activity, correlated with outcome. Chymotrypsin-like and caspase-like activities, but not trypsin-like activity, predicted response in univariate analysis (P = 0.002). However, only chymotrypsin-like activity was independent predictor of response from age grouping (<70 versus > or =70 years), cytogenetics, and blood ureanitrogen in multivariate analysis. Similarly, both chymotrypsin-like and caspase-like activities, but not trypsin-like activity, were predictors of overall survival in univariate analysis (P < 0.0001), but only chymotrypsin-like activity was independent of cytogenetics, age, performance status, blood ureanitrogen, and beta(2)-microglobulin in multivariate Cox regression models. Chymotrypsin-like activity was also a strong independent predictor of survival in patients with intermediate karyotype (n = 124). CONCLUSIONS: Measuring plasma chymotrypsin-like activity may provide a powerful biomarker for risk stratification in patients with AML and advanced-stage MDS, including those with normal karyotype.
Authors: Maha Ahmed; Francis Giles; Youngson Joe; Donna M Weber; Iman Jilani; Taghi Manshouri; Sergio Giralt; Marcos De Lima; Michael Keating; Maher Albitar Journal: Eur J Haematol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 2.997
Authors: Lars Bullinger; Konstanze Döhner; Eric Bair; Stefan Fröhling; Richard F Schlenk; Robert Tibshirani; Hartmut Döhner; Jonathan R Pollack Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-04-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Taghi Manshouri; Kim-anh Do; Xuemei Wang; Francis J Giles; Susan M O'Brien; Helen Saffer; Deborah Thomas; Iman Jilani; Hagop M Kantarjian; Michael J Keating; Maher Albitar Journal: Blood Date: 2002-11-21 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1977-01 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: B C Potts; M X Albitar; K C Anderson; S Baritaki; C Berkers; B Bonavida; J Chandra; D Chauhan; J C Cusack; W Fenical; I M Ghobrial; M Groll; P R Jensen; K S Lam; G K Lloyd; W McBride; D J McConkey; C P Miller; S T C Neuteboom; Y Oki; H Ovaa; F Pajonk; P G Richardson; A M Roccaro; C M Sloss; M A Spear; E Valashi; A Younes; M A Palladino Journal: Curr Cancer Drug Targets Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.428
Authors: Ruenn Chai Lai; Soon Sim Tan; Bao Ju Teh; Siu Kwan Sze; Fatih Arslan; Dominique P de Kleijn; Andre Choo; Sai Kiang Lim Journal: Int J Proteomics Date: 2012-07-18
Authors: Adam Szulkin; Gustav Nilsonne; Filip Mundt; Agata M Wasik; Pega Souri; Anders Hjerpe; Katalin Dobra Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-20 Impact factor: 3.240