BACKGROUND: In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the presence or absence of recurrent cytogenetic aberrations is used to identify the appropriate therapy. However, the current classification system does not fully reflect the molecular heterogeneity of the disease, and treatment stratification is difficult, especially for patients with intermediate-risk AML with a normal karyotype. METHODS: We used complementary-DNA microarrays to determine the levels of gene expression in peripheral-blood samples or bone marrow samples from 116 adults with AML (including 45 with a normal karyotype). We used unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis to identify molecular subgroups with distinct gene-expression signatures. Using a training set of samples from 59 patients, we applied a novel supervised learning algorithm to devise a gene-expression-based clinical-outcome predictor, which we then tested using an independent validation group comprising the 57 remaining patients. RESULTS: Unsupervised analysis identified new molecular subtypes of AML, including two prognostically relevant subgroups in AML with a normal karyotype. Using the supervised learning algorithm, we constructed an optimal 133-gene clinical-outcome predictor, which accurately predicted overall survival among patients in the independent validation group (P=0.006), including the subgroup of patients with AML with a normal karyotype (P=0.046). In multivariate analysis, the gene-expression predictor was a strong independent prognostic factor (odds ratio, 8.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.6 to 29.3; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of gene-expression profiling improves the molecular classification of adult AML. Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society
BACKGROUND: In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the presence or absence of recurrent cytogenetic aberrations is used to identify the appropriate therapy. However, the current classification system does not fully reflect the molecular heterogeneity of the disease, and treatment stratification is difficult, especially for patients with intermediate-risk AML with a normal karyotype. METHODS: We used complementary-DNA microarrays to determine the levels of gene expression in peripheral-blood samples or bone marrow samples from 116 adults with AML (including 45 with a normal karyotype). We used unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis to identify molecular subgroups with distinct gene-expression signatures. Using a training set of samples from 59 patients, we applied a novel supervised learning algorithm to devise a gene-expression-based clinical-outcome predictor, which we then tested using an independent validation group comprising the 57 remaining patients. RESULTS: Unsupervised analysis identified new molecular subtypes of AML, including two prognostically relevant subgroups in AML with a normal karyotype. Using the supervised learning algorithm, we constructed an optimal 133-gene clinical-outcome predictor, which accurately predicted overall survival among patients in the independent validation group (P=0.006), including the subgroup of patients with AML with a normal karyotype (P=0.046). In multivariate analysis, the gene-expression predictor was a strong independent prognostic factor (odds ratio, 8.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.6 to 29.3; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of gene-expression profiling improves the molecular classification of adult AML. Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society
Authors: John J Tentler; Sujatha Nallapareddy; Aik Choon Tan; Anna Spreafico; Todd M Pitts; M Pia Morelli; Heather M Selby; Maria I Kachaeva; Sara A Flanigan; Gillian N Kulikowski; Stephen Leong; John J Arcaroli; Wells A Messersmith; S Gail Eckhardt Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2010-10-05 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Zejuan Li; Hao Huang; Yuanyuan Li; Xi Jiang; Ping Chen; Stephen Arnovitz; Michael D Radmacher; Kati Maharry; Abdel Elkahloun; Xinan Yang; Chunjiang He; Miao He; Zhiyu Zhang; Konstanze Dohner; Mary Beth Neilly; Colles Price; Yves A Lussier; Yanming Zhang; Richard A Larson; Michelle M Le Beau; Michael A Caligiuri; Lars Bullinger; Peter J M Valk; Ruud Delwel; Bob Lowenberg; Paul P Liu; Guido Marcucci; Clara D Bloomfield; Janet D Rowley; Jianjun Chen Journal: Blood Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Laura Barreyro; Britta Will; Boris Bartholdy; Li Zhou; Tihomira I Todorova; Robert F Stanley; Susana Ben-Neriah; Cristina Montagna; Samir Parekh; Andrea Pellagatti; Jacqueline Boultwood; Elisabeth Paietta; Rhett P Ketterling; Larry Cripe; Hugo F Fernandez; Peter L Greenberg; Martin S Tallman; Christian Steidl; Constantine S Mitsiades; Amit Verma; Ulrich Steidl Journal: Blood Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Benjamin J Frisch; John M Ashton; Lianping Xing; Michael W Becker; Craig T Jordan; Laura M Calvi Journal: Blood Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Zejuan Li; Tobias Herold; Chunjiang He; Peter J M Valk; Ping Chen; Vindi Jurinovic; Ulrich Mansmann; Michael D Radmacher; Kati S Maharry; Miao Sun; Xinan Yang; Hao Huang; Xi Jiang; Maria-Cristina Sauerland; Thomas Büchner; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Abdel Elkahloun; Mary Beth Neilly; Yanming Zhang; Richard A Larson; Michelle M Le Beau; Michael A Caligiuri; Konstanze Döhner; Lars Bullinger; Paul P Liu; Ruud Delwel; Guido Marcucci; Bob Lowenberg; Clara D Bloomfield; Janet D Rowley; Stefan K Bohlander; Jianjun Chen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Andreeff; V Ruvolo; S Gadgil; C Zeng; K Coombes; W Chen; S Kornblau; A E Barón; H A Drabkin Journal: Leukemia Date: 2008-07-31 Impact factor: 11.528