BACKGROUND: No rapid methods exist for screening overall dietary intakes in older adults. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a scoring system for a diet screening tool to identify nutritional risk in community-dwelling older adults. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study in older adults (n = 204) who reside in rural areas examined nutrition status by using an in-person interview, biochemical measures, and four 24-h recalls that included the use of dietary supplements. RESULTS: The dietary screening tool was able to characterize 3 levels of nutritional risk: at risk, possible risk, and not at risk. Individuals classified as at nutritional risk had significantly lower indicators of diet quality (Healthy Eating Index and Mean Adequacy Ratio) and intakes of protein, most micronutrients, dietary fiber, fruit, and vegetables. The at-risk group had higher intakes of fats and oils and refined grains. The at-risk group also had the lowest serum vitamin B-12, folate, beta-cryptoxanthin, lutein, and zeaxanthin concentrations. The not-at-nutritional-risk group had significantly higher lycopene and beta-carotene and lower homocysteine and methylmalonic acid concentrations. CONCLUSION: The dietary screening tool is a simple and practical tool that can help to detect nutritional risk in older adults.
BACKGROUND: No rapid methods exist for screening overall dietary intakes in older adults. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a scoring system for a diet screening tool to identify nutritional risk in community-dwelling older adults. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study in older adults (n = 204) who reside in rural areas examined nutrition status by using an in-person interview, biochemical measures, and four 24-h recalls that included the use of dietary supplements. RESULTS: The dietary screening tool was able to characterize 3 levels of nutritional risk: at risk, possible risk, and not at risk. Individuals classified as at nutritional risk had significantly lower indicators of diet quality (Healthy Eating Index and Mean Adequacy Ratio) and intakes of protein, most micronutrients, dietary fiber, fruit, and vegetables. The at-risk group had higher intakes of fats and oils and refined grains. The at-risk group also had the lowest serum vitamin B-12, folate, beta-cryptoxanthin, lutein, and zeaxanthin concentrations. The not-at-nutritional-risk group had significantly higher lycopene and beta-carotene and lower homocysteine and methylmalonic acid concentrations. CONCLUSION: The dietary screening tool is a simple and practical tool that can help to detect nutritional risk in older adults.
Authors: Karen J Calfas; James F Sallis; Marion F Zabinski; Denise E Wilfley; Joan Rupp; Judith J Prochaska; Sheri Thompson; Michael Pratt; Kevin Patrick Journal: Prev Med Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Michael P Pignone; Alice Ammerman; Louise Fernandez; C Tracy Orleans; Nola Pender; Steven Woolf; Kathleen N Lohr; Sonya Sutton Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Janet A Foote; Suzanne P Murphy; Lynne R Wilkens; Jean H Hankin; Brian E Henderson; Laurence N Kolonel Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: S S Jonnalagadda; D C Mitchell; H Smiciklas-Wright; K B Meaker; N Van Heel; W Karmally; A G Ershow; P M Kris-Etherton Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2000-03
Authors: S M Robinson; K A Jameson; I Bloom; G Ntani; S R Crozier; H Syddall; E M Dennison; C R Cooper; A A Sayer Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Patricia M Guenther; Kellie O Casavale; Jill Reedy; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Hazel A B Hiza; Kevin J Kuczynski; Lisa L Kahle; Susan M Krebs-Smith Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: D W Ford; G L Jensen; C Still; C Wood; D C Mitchell; P Erickson; R Bailey; H Smiciklas-Wright; D L Coffman; T J Hartman Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2014 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Paige E Miller; Philip Lazarus; Samuel M Lesko; Amanda J Cross; Rashmi Sinha; Jason Laio; Jay Zhu; Gregory Harper; Joshua E Muscat; Terryl J Hartman Journal: Nutr Cancer Date: 2013 Impact factor: 2.900
Authors: Dara W Ford; Terryl J Hartman; Christopher Still; Craig Wood; Diane C Mitchell; Regan Bailey; Helen Smiciklas-Wright; Donna L Coffman; Gordon L Jensen Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: D C Mitchell; K L Tucker; J Maras; F R Lawrence; H Smiciklas-Wright; G L Jensen; C D Still; T J Hartman Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Dara W Ford; Terryl J Hartman; Christopher Still; Craig Wood; Diane Mitchell; Pao Ying Hsiao; Regan Bailey; Helen Smiciklas-Wright; Donna L Coffman; Gordon L Jensen Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Andrea Y Angstadt; Terryl J Hartman; Samuel M Lesko; Joshua E Muscat; Junjia Zhu; Carla J Gallagher; Philip Lazarus Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 5.006