| Literature DB >> 19457241 |
Xin Hong1, JieQuan Li, Fei Xu, Lap Ah Tse, YaQiong Liang, ZhiYong Wang, Ignatius Tak-sun Yu, Sian Griffiths.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An inverse relationship between physical activity (PA) and depression among adolescents has been reported in developed communities without consideration of sedentary behaviors (SB, including sitting for course study, viewing TV, and sleeping). We explored the association between recreational PA time (hr/wk) and depression after adjustment with SB and other possible confounders among Chinese adolescents.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19457241 PMCID: PMC2693135 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Associations of physical activity time categories with potential confounders among urban high-school students in Nanjing, China
| Physical Activity Time (hr/wk) (n, %) | ||||||
| Characteristics | 0–0.9 | 1–7 | 8–14 | 15 + | p* | |
| Girls | 286 (54.8) | 590 (56.0) | 243 (49.2) | 145 (38.7) | 36.659 | < 0.001 |
| Boys | 236 (45.2) | 463 (44.0) | 251 (50.8) | 230 (61.3) | ||
| 7 | 132 (25.3) | 337 (32.0) | 159 (32.2) | 140 (37.3) | 24.219 | < 0.001 |
| 8 | 173 (33.1) | 350 (33.2) | 176 (35.6) | 130 (34.7) | ||
| 9 | 217(41.6) | 366 (34.8) | 159 (32.2) | 105 (28.0) | ||
| Non-overweight | 450 (86.2) | 933 (88.6) | 444 (89.9) | 341 (90.9) | 6.588 | 0.361 |
| Overweight | 47 (9.0) | 77 (7.3) | 35 (7.1) | 24 (6.4) | ||
| Obesity | 25 (4.8) | 43 (4.1) | 15 (3.0) | 10 (2.7) | ||
| Junior high school or less | 180 (34.5) | 366 (34.8) | 142 (28.7) | 140 (37.3) | 31.108 | < 0.001 |
| Senior high school | 222 (42.5) | 454 (43.1) | 205 (41.5) | 175 (46.7) | ||
| Undergraduate | 102 (19.5) | 195 (18.5) | 125 (25.3) | 42 (11.2) | ||
| Graduate | 18 (3.4) | 38 (3.6) | 22 (4.5) | 18 (4.8) | ||
| Junior high school or less | 242 (46.4) | 475 (45.1) | 188 (38.1) | 135 (36.0) | 50.965 | < 0.001 |
| Senior high school | 222 (42.5) | 434 (41.2 | 189 (38.3) | 155 (41.3) | ||
| Undergraduate | 52 (10.0) | 130 (12.3) | 110 (22.3) | 77 (20.5) | ||
| Graduate | 6 (1.1) | 14 (1.3) | 7 (1.4) | 8 (2.1) | ||
| Both parents | 480 (92.0) | 925 (87.8) | 413 (83.6) | 320 (85.3) | 24.745 | < 0.001 |
| Single parent | 24 (4.6) | 88 (8.4) | 63 (12.8) | 43 (11.5) | ||
| Others | 18 (3.4) | 40 (3.8) | 18 (3.6) | 12 (3.2) | ||
| Low | 205 (39.3) | 314 (29.8) | 171 (34.6) | 141 (37.6) | 28.148 | < 0.001 |
| Middle | 141 (27.0) | 351 (33.3) | 175 (35.4) | 132 (35.2) | ||
| High | 176 (33.7) | 388 (36.8) | 148 (30.0) | 102 (27.2) | ||
| Low | 200 (38.3) | 348 (33.0) | 138 (27.9) | 112 (29.9) | 22.317 | 0.001 |
| Middle | 144 (27.6) | 366 (34.8) | 173 (35.0) | 113 (30.1) | ||
| High | 178 (34.1) | 339 (32.2) | 183 (37.0) | 150 (40.0) | ||
| Low | 148 (28.4) | 338 (32.1) | 170 (34.4) | 150 (40.0) | 41.527 | < 0.001 |
| Middle | 150 (28.7) | 313 (29.7) | 182 (36.8) | 125 (33.3) | ||
| High | 224 (42.9) | 402 (38.2) | 142 (28.7) | 100 (26.7) | ||
| Non | 380 (72.8) | 715 (67.9) | 394 (79.8) | 285 (76.0) | 26.589 | < 0.001 |
| Yes | 142 (27.2) | 338 (32.1) | 100 (20.2) | 90 (24.0) | ||
| Non | 491 (94.1) | 989 (93.9) | 476 (96.4) | 360 (96.0) | 5.701 | 0.127 |
| Yes | 31 (5.9) | 64 (6.1) | 18 (3.6) | 15 (4.0) | ||
| Non | 348 (66.7) | 666 (63.2) | 311 (63.0) | 224 (59.7) | 4.624 | 0.201 |
| Yes | 174 (33.3) | 387 (36.8) | 183 (37.0) | 151 (40.3) | ||
| 522 (21.4) | 1053 (43.1) | 494 (20.2) | 375 (15.3) | - | - | |
n = number of participants within subgroup; % = Percentages across column.
* p-value between sub-groups of each variable.
† Study time, sleep time, and TV time were classified into tertiles, separately.
Prevalence of depression (n and %) and its association with gender, grade, BMI, SES, SB time, alcohol consumption, smoking behavior, and unintentional injuries among urban high-school students in Nanjing, China
| Prevalence n (%) | |||
| Depression | Non-depression | Adj. Odds ratio (95% CI)** | |
| Girls | 172 (13.6) | 1092 (86.4) | 1 |
| Boys | 212 (18.0) | 968 (82.0) | 1.04 (0.79, 1.38) |
| 7 | 102 (13.3) | 666 (86.7) | 1 |
| 8 | 145 (17.5) | 684 (82.5) | 1.06 (0.77, 1.45) |
| 9 | 137 (16.2) | 710 (83.8) | 0.84 (0.61, 1.17) |
| Non-overweight | 329 (15.2) | 1839 (84.8) | 1 |
| Overweight | 35 (19.1) | 148 (80.9) | 1.23 (0.97, 1.56) |
| Obesity | 20 (21.5) | 73 (78.5) | 1.43 (1.01, 2.02) |
| Both employed | 256 (14.1) | 1564 (85.9) | 1 |
| Father unemployed | 24 (24.0) | 76 (76.0) | 1.69 (0.96, 2.97) |
| Mother unemployed | 66 (18.4) | 292 (81.6) | 1.25 (0.89, 1.77) |
| Both unemployed | 38 (22.8) | 128 (77.2) | 1.60 (1.02, 2.51) |
| Both parents | 320 (15.0) | 1818 (85.0) | 1 |
| Single parent | 40 (18.3) | 178 (81.7) | 1.11 (0.72, 1.70) |
| Others | 24 (27.3) | 64 (72.7) | 2.39 (1.35, 4.29) |
| Low | 120 (14.4) | 711 (85.6) | 1 |
| Middle | 128 (16.0) | 671 (84.0) | 1.03 (0.77, 1.38) |
| High | 136 (16.7) | 678 (83.3) | 1.12 (0.84, 1.49) |
| Low | 155 (19.4) | 643 (80.6) | 1 |
| Middle | 120 (15.1) | 676 (84.9) | 0.77 (0.58, 1.02) |
| High | 109 (12.8) | 741 (87.2) | 0.63 (0.47, 0.85) |
| Low | 128 (15.9) | 678 (84.1) | 1 |
| Middle | 99 (12.9) | 671 (87.1) | 0.84 (0.62, 1.13) |
| High | 157 (18.1) | 711 (81.9) | 1.27 (0.94, 1.67) |
| Non | 216 (12.2) | 1558 (87.8) | 1 |
| Yes | 168 (25.1) | 502 (75.9) | 1.97 (1.55, 2.52) |
| Non | 332 (14.3) | 1984 (85.7) | 1 |
| Yes | 52 (40.5) | 76 (59.5) | 2.69 (1.80, 4.03) |
| Non | 207 (13.4) | 1342 (86.6) | 1 |
| Yes | 177 (19.4) | 718 (80.2) | 1.45 (1.34, 1.86) |
| 384 (15.7) | 2060 (84.3) | - | |
n = number of participants within subgroup; % = Percentages across row.
** odds ratios adjusted for age, gender, school grade, BMI, TV time, study time, sleep time, smoking behavior, alcohol consumption, unintentional injuries, parents' educational attainments, parents' job statuses, family structure.
† Study time, sleep time, and TV time were classified into tertiles, separately.
Prevalence of depression (n and %) and its association with physical activity time by gender and grade among junior high school students in Nanjing, China
| Prevalence n (%) | ||||
| PA category | Depression | Non-depression | Unadjusted Odds ratio | Adjusted Odds ratio |
| 0–0.9 | 120 (23.0) | 402 (77.0) | 1 | 1 |
| 1–7 | 147 (14.0) | 906 (86.0) | 0.63 (0.54, 0.74) | 0.70 (0.57, 0.86) |
| 8–14 | 68 (13.8) | 426 (86.2) | 0.58 (0.48, 0.71) | 0.68 (0.53, 0.88) |
| 15+ | 49 (13.1) | 326 (86.9) | 0.53 (0.43, 0.66) | 0.66 (0.50, 0.87) |
| Girls | ||||
| 0–0.9 | 62 (21.7) | 224 (78.3) | 1 | 1 |
| 1–7 | 63 (10.7) | 527 (89.3) | 0.42 (0.29, 0.62) | 0.56 (0.27, 0.64) |
| 8–14 | 32 (13.2) | 211 (86.8) | 0.55 (0.34, 0.87) | 0.65 (0.40, 1.08) |
| 15+ | 15 (10.3) | 130 (89.7) | 0.42 (0.23, 0.76) | 0.35 (0.17, 0.69) |
| Boys | ||||
| 0–0.9 | 58 (24.6) | 178 (75.4) | 1 | 1 |
| 1–7 | 84 (18.1) | 379 (81.9) | 0.68 (0.46, 0.99) | 0.74 (0.48, 1.13) |
| 8–14 | 36 (14.3) | 215 (85.7) | 0.51 (0.32, 0.82) | 0.54 (0.32, 0.91) |
| 15+ | 34 (14.8) | 196 (85.2) | 0.54 (0.34, 0.87) | 0.56 (0.33, 0.96) |
| 7 | ||||
| 0–0.9 | 25 (18.9) | 107 (81.1) | 1 | 1 |
| 1–7 | 45 (13.4) | 292 (86.6) | 0.66 (0.39, 1.13) | 0.73 (0.49, 0.98) |
| 8–14 | 14 (8.8) | 145 (91.2) | 0.41 (0.21, 0.83) | 0.50 (0.28, 0.88) |
| 15+ | 18 (12.9) | 122 (87.1) | 0.63 (0.33, 1.22) | 0.59 (0.28, 1.26) |
| 8 | ||||
| 0–0.9 | 41 (23.7) | 132 (76.3) | 1 | 1 |
| 1–7 | 51 (14.6) | 299 (85.4) | 0.55 (0.35, 0.87) | 0.61 (0.31, 0.85) |
| 8–14 | 30 (17.0) | 146 (83.0) | 0.66 (0.39, 1.12) | 0.60 (0.33, 1.08) |
| 15+ | 23 (17.7) | 107 (82.3) | 0.69 (0.39, 1.23) | 0.49 (0.26, 0.96) |
| 9 | ||||
| 0–0.9 | 54 (24.9) | 163 (75.1) | 1 | 1 |
| 1–7 | 51 (13.9) | 315 (86.1) | 0.49 (0.32, 0.75) | 0.53 (0.33, 0.85) |
| 8–14 | 24 (15.1) | 135 (84.9) | 0.54 (0.32, 0.91) | 0.58 (0.32, 1.04) |
| 15+ | 8 (7.6) | 97 (92.4) | 0.25 (0.11, 0.55) | 0.24 (0.10, 0.58) |
n = number of participants within subgroup; % = Percentages across row.
using "0–0.9 hr/wk" as the reference group.
*odds ratio calculated via univariate logistic regression model.
**odds ratios calculated via multivariate logistic regression model with adjustment for age, gender, school grade, BMI, TV time, study time, sleep time, smoking behavior, alcohol consumption, unintentional injuries, parents educational attainments, parents' job statuses, family structure.
The association between physical activity time and CDI value* among urban junior high-school students in Nanjing, China, using linear regression models
| Total | Girls | Boys | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
| B | -0.033 | -0.051 | -0.029 | -0.015 | -0.027 | -0.057 |
| SE | 0.005 | 0.010 | 0.006 | 0.009 | 0.013 | 0.021 |
| R2 | 0.005 | 0.007 | 0.006 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| p-value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.101 | 0.045 | 0.005 |
| DF | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| B | -0.030 | -0.046 | -0.024 | -0.011 | -0.024 | -0.050 |
| SE | 0.005 | 0.015 | 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| R2 | 0.011 | 0.013 | 0.008 | 0.006 | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| p-value | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.186 | 0.040 | 0.000 |
| DF | 15 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 |
*Time spent in physical activity and CDI were both considered as continuous variables, with CDI as the dependent variable.
B: unstandardized coefficient; SE: standard error.
# Model 1: regression coefficient calculated via univariate linear regression model.
§ Model 2: regression coefficient calculated via multivariate linear regression model with adjustment for age, gender, school grade, BMI, TV time, study time, sleep time, smoking behavior, alcohol consumption, unintentional injuries, parents' educational attainments, parents' job statuses, and family structure.