Literature DB >> 15322899

Complex interactions between native and invasive fish: the simultaneous effects of multiple negative interactions.

Michael D Mills1, Russell B Rader, Mark C Belk.   

Abstract

We suggest that the ultimate outcome of interactions between native species and invasive species (extinction or coexistence) depends on the number of simultaneous negative interactions (competition and predation), which depends on relative body sizes of the species. Multiple simultaneous interactions may constrain the ability of native species to trade fitness components (i.e., reduced growth for reduced risk of predation) causing a spiral to extinction. We found evidence for five types of interactions between the adults and juveniles of introduced western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) and the juveniles of native least chub (Iotichthys phlegethontis). We added ten large (23-28 mm) and seven small (9-13 mm) young-of-the-year (YOY) least chub to replicate enclosures with zero, low, and high densities of mosquitofish in a desert spring ecosystem. Treatments with mosquitofish reduced the average survival of least chub by one-third. No small YOY least chub survived in enclosures with high mosquitofish densities. We also performed two laboratory experiments to determine mortality to predation, aggressiveness, and habitat selection of least chub in the presence of mosquitofish. Mean mortality of least chub due to predation by large mosquitofish was 69.7% over a 3-h trial. Least chub were less aggressive, selected protected habitats (Potamogeton spp.), and were more stationary in the presence of mosquitofish where the dominance hierarchy was large mosquitofish>>large least chub approximately small mosquitofish>>small least chub. Least chub juveniles appear to be figuratively caught in a vice. Rapid growth to a size refuge could reduce the risk of predation, but the simultaneous effects of competition decreased least chub growth and prolonged the period when juveniles were vulnerable to mosquitofish predation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15322899     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1695-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  The Interaction between Competition and Predation: A Meta-analysis of Field Experiments.

Authors:  Jessica Gurevitch; Janet A Morrison; Larry V Hedges
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  COMPETITION, HABITAT SELECTION, AND CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT.

Authors:  R MACARTHUR; R LEVINS
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1964-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comments on design and analysis of multiple-choice feeding-preference experiments.

Authors:  Bryan F J Manly
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Direct and indirect effects of predation on mosquitofish behavior and survival.

Authors:  Dana L Winkelman; John M Aho
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods.

Authors:  J Altmann
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.991

6.  Social modification of agonistic behaviour in fish.

Authors:  A L McDonald; N W Heimstra; D K Damkot
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.844

  6 in total
  14 in total

1.  Salinity mediates the competitive interactions between invasive mosquitofish and an endangered fish.

Authors:  Carles Alcaraz; Angelo Bisazza; Emili García-Berthou
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The vulnerability of species to range expansions by predators can be predicted using historical species associations and body size.

Authors:  Karen M Alofs; Donald A Jackson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Modeling effects of disturbance across life history strategies of stream fishes.

Authors:  Robert J Fournier; Nick R Bond; Daniel D Magoulick
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Stage-dependent predation on competitors: consequences for the outcome of a mosquito invasion.

Authors:  Barry W Alto; Banugopan Kesavaraju; Steven A Juliano; L Philip Lounibos
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Conservation and conflict between endangered desert fishes.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gumm; Jennifer L Snekser; Murray Itzkowitz
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Host introduction and parasites: a case study on the parasite community of the peacock grouper Cephalopholis argus (Serranidae) in the Hawaiian Islands.

Authors:  Matthias Vignon; Pierre Sasal; René Galzin
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 2.289

7.  Aggressiveness overcomes body-size effects in fights staged between invasive and native fish species with overlapping niches.

Authors:  Fábio Henrique Carretero Sanches; Caio Akira Miyai; Tânia Márcia Costa; Ronaldo Adriano Christofoletti; Gilson Luiz Volpato; Rodrigo Egydio Barreto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The disruption of dominance hierarchies by a non-native species: an individual-based analysis.

Authors:  S Blanchet; G Loot; L Bernatchez; J J Dodson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 3.298

9.  Experimental evidence that ecological effects of an invasive fish are reduced at high densities.

Authors:  Matthew S Kornis; Jedchada Carlson; Gabrielle Lehrer-Brey; M Jake Vander Zanden
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Survival, growth and stress response of juvenile tidewater goby, Eucyclogobius newberryi, to interspecific competition for food.

Authors:  Daniel A Chase; Erin E Flynn; Anne E Todgham
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.