Literature DB >> 19456199

Distal embolic event protection using excimer laser ablation in peripheral vascular interventions: results of the DEEP EMBOLI registry.

Nicolas W Shammas1, Denise Coiner, Gail A Shammas, Lori Christensen, Eric J Dippel, Michael Jerin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the results from a single-center prospective registry (DEEP EMBOLI) established to evaluate distal embolization during percutaneous lower extremity interventions using excimer laser ablative therapy.
METHODS: Elective patients with infrainguinal occlusive disease were eligible for this registry if the lesion(s) met one or more of these angiographic criteria: (1) moderate or severe calcification of any length, (2) total occlusions of any length, (3) a filling defect, (4) irregular (ulcerated) lesions at least 30 mm in length, and/or (5) smooth, non-ulcerated lesions at least 50 mm in length. In all, 20 patients (15 women; mean age 70.9+/-10.8 years) with 28 lesions (de novo 13, restenotic 15) were enrolled and underwent treatment with laser atherectomy. SpiderFx filters were utilized before laser treatment in 18 of 20 patients and before final definitive treatment with angioplasty +/- stenting in all 20 patients. The primary angiographic outcome was a residual narrowing of <30% or 30% to 50% with <20 mmHg gradient across lesion after final treatment. The primary safety endpoint was the embolization rate produced by the laser based on the presence of clinically significant (>or=2 mm long) macrodebris in the filter.
RESULTS: Adjunctive angioplasty and stenting were performed in 27 (96.4%) and 17 (60.7%) lesions, respectively. All filters were deployed and retrieved successfully, with no complications. The primary angiographic endpoint was met in 100% of patients. Macrodebris was found in 12 (66.7%) of 18 patients after treatment with the laser [4 (22.2%) filters with clinically significant emboli] and in 7 (35%) of 20 patients after adjunctive treatment [4 (20.0%) clinically significant emboli]. One (5.0%) distal embolization occurred after filter removal prior to completion of definitive treatment.
CONCLUSION: Embolization does occur with laser photoablation in the lower extremity, but the rate of clinically significant macrodebris is low ( approximately 20%) and similar to that found after angioplasty and stenting. Embolic filter protection appears to be very effective in capturing macrodebris, and its use is associated with good acute angiographic outcome. Problems with filter retrieval were not encountered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19456199     DOI: 10.1583/08-2642.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  13 in total

Review 1.  An overview of optimal endovascular strategy in treating the femoropopliteal artery: mechanical, biological, and procedural factors.

Authors:  Nicolas W Shammas
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2013-03

2.  Use of Embolic Protection Devices in Peripheral Interventions.

Authors:  Martin G Radvany
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-05

3.  Ubiquitous Nature of Distal Athero/Thromboembolic Events during Lower Extremity Atherectomy Procedures Involving the Superficial Femoral Artery.

Authors:  Najam Wasty; M Z Khakwani; Spas Kotev; Catalin Boiangiu; Omar Hasan; Manjusha Anna; Rajiv Tayal; Khalil Kaid; Gail Baker; Marc Cohen
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2016-09-05

4.  Excimer laser ablation combined with drug-coated balloon versus drug-coated balloon in the treatment of de novo atherosclerotic lesions in lower extremities (ELABORATE): study protocol for a real-world clinical trial.

Authors:  Xiaolang Jiang; Longhua Fan; Bin Chen; Junhao Jiang; Jianjun Liu; Guanyu Qiao; Shuai Ju; Yun Shi; Tao Ma; Changpo Lin; Gang Fang; Daqiao Guo; Xin Xu; Zhihui Dong; Weiguo Fu
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 2.174

5.  Embolic Protection using the WIRION Embolic Protection System with JetStream Atherectomy in a Patient with Superficial Femoral Artery Chronic total Occlusion.

Authors:  Nicolas W Shammas
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2016-06-28

6.  Clinical significance of embolic events in patients undergoing endovascular femoropopliteal interventions with or without embolic protection devices.

Authors:  Bernardo C Mendes; Gustavo S Oderich; Mark D Fleming; Sanjay Misra; Audra A Duncan; Manju Kalra; Stephen Cha; Peter Gloviczki
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Effective endovascular treatment of calcified femoropopliteal disease with directional atherectomy and distal embolic protection: final results of the DEFINITIVE Ca⁺⁺ trial.

Authors:  David Roberts; Khusrow Niazi; William Miller; Prakash Krishnan; Roger Gammon; Theodore Schreiber; Nicolas W Shammas; Daniel Clair
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Incidence, risk factors, treatment and prognosis of popliteal artery embolization in the superficial femoral artery interventions.

Authors:  Weiwei Wu; Surong Hua; Yongjun Li; Wei Ye; Bao Liu; Yuehong Zheng; Xiaojun Song; Changwei Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Atherectomy devices: technology update.

Authors:  Nuri I Akkus; Abdulrahman Abdulbaki; Enrique Jimenez; Neeraj Tandon
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-12-17

10.  Comparison and Analysis between the NAV6 Embolic Protection Filter and SpiderFX EPD Filter in Superficial Femoral Artery Lesions.

Authors:  Prakash Krishnan; Arthur Tarricone; Allen Gee; Serdar Farhan; Haroon Kamran; Annapoorna Kini; Samin Sharma
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.