Literature DB >> 19454870

Efficacy and safety of lacosamide in diabetic neuropathic pain: an 18-week double-blind placebo-controlled trial of fixed-dose regimens.

James P Wymer1, Jeffrey Simpson, David Sen, Sabine Bongardt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial were to confirm the efficacy of lacosamide at a daily dose of 400 mg/d and to explore the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lacosamide 200 mg/d and 600 mg/d in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy.
METHODS: The trial consisted of a 2-week run-in period, a 6-week titration phase, and a 12-week maintenance phase, during which patients received placebo or fixed doses of lacosamide 200, 400, or 600 mg/d. No back titration was allowed during the trial. The primary efficacy criterion was the change in Likert pain score from baseline to the average over the last 4 weeks of the maintenance phase in the intent-to-treat population.
RESULTS: The lacosamide 400 mg/d group demonstrated statistically significant improvement in Likert pain score over placebo for the primary efficacy measure. At the end of treatment, 58% of patients in the lacosamide 400 mg/d treatment group achieved at least a 2-point or 30% reduction in Likert pain score, compared with 46% of placebo-treated patients. The lacosamide 200 mg/d group separated from placebo, but failed to show statistical significance for any of the primary or secondary outcome measures. The lacosamide 600 mg/d group was significantly more efficacious than placebo in the observed cases but not in the intent-to-treat population. This was probably secondary to a relatively high-premature withdrawal rate due to adverse events that occurred during the titration phase in that group. Overall lacosamide at daily doses of 200 to 400 mg was well tolerated, with 8% of patients discontinuing due to an adverse event from the 200 mg/d group and 23% from the 400 mg/d group compared with 9% in the placebo group. Discontinuations due to adverse events were highest in the 600 mg/d group (40%). The most common adverse events consisted of dizziness, nausea, tremor, headache, and fatigue. Somnolence, cognitive and behavioral side effects, weight change, and edema were notably low. DISCUSSION: Safety and efficacy analyses indicated that lacosamide 400 mg/d provided an optimal balance between efficacy and side effects in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19454870     DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318196d2b6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  38 in total

Review 1.  Sodium channel blockers for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Anindya Bhattacharya; Alan D Wickenden; Sandra R Chaplan
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Lacosamide: what can be expected from the next new antiepileptic drug?

Authors:  Bassel W Abou-Khalil
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 7.500

Review 3.  Evidence-based guideline: Treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy: report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Authors:  V Bril; J England; G M Franklin; M Backonja; J Cohen; D Del Toro; E Feldman; D J Iverson; B Perkins; J W Russell; D Zochodne
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Neuropathic pain in diabetes--evidence for a central mechanism.

Authors:  Tanya Z Fischer; Stephen G Waxman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 5.  Alcoholic neuropathy: possible mechanisms and future treatment possibilities.

Authors:  Kanwaljit Chopra; Vinod Tiwari
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Handling missing data in a duloxetine population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model - imputation methods and selection models.

Authors:  Eunice Yuen; Ivelina Gueorguieva; Leon Aarons
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 7.  Diabetic painful and insensate neuropathy: pathogenesis and potential treatments.

Authors:  Irina G Obrosova
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 8.  Painful diabetic neuropathy: advantage of novel drugs over old drugs?

Authors:  Dan Ziegler
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Efficacy and safety of lacosamide in painful diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  Dan Ziegler; Tibor Hidvégi; Irina Gurieva; Sabine Bongardt; Rainer Freynhagen; David Sen; Kenneth Sommerville
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Lacosamide as treatment for partial epilepsy: mechanisms of action, pharmacology, effects, and safety.

Authors:  Christoph Kellinghaus
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.