AIM: To investigate the effect of pain relief after infusion of ropivacaine at port sites at the end of surgery. METHODS:From October 2006 to September 2007, 72 patients undergoinglaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) were randomized into two groups of 36 patients. One group received ropivacaine infusion at the port sites at the end of LC and the other received normal saline. A visual analog scale was used to assess postoperative pain when the patient awakened in the operating room, 6 and 24 h after surgery, and before discharge. The amount of analgesics use was also recorded. The demographics, laboratory data, hospital stay, and perioperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups preoperatively in terms of demographic and laboratory data. After surgery, similar operation time, blood loss, and no postoperative morbidity and mortality were observed in the two groups. However, a significantly lower pain score was observed in the patients undergoing LC with local anesthesia infusion at 1 h after LC and at discharge. Regarding analgesic use, the amount of meperidine used 1 h after LC and the total used during admission were lower in patients undergoing LC with local anesthesia infusion. This group also had a shorter hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Local anesthesia with ropivacaine at the port site in LC patients significantly decreased postoperative pain immediately. This explains the lower meperidine use and earlier discharge for these patients.
RCT Entities:
AIM: To investigate the effect of pain relief after infusion of ropivacaine at port sites at the end of surgery. METHODS: From October 2006 to September 2007, 72 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) were randomized into two groups of 36 patients. One group received ropivacaine infusion at the port sites at the end of LC and the other received normal saline. A visual analog scale was used to assess postoperative pain when the patient awakened in the operating room, 6 and 24 h after surgery, and before discharge. The amount of analgesics use was also recorded. The demographics, laboratory data, hospital stay, and perioperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups preoperatively in terms of demographic and laboratory data. After surgery, similar operation time, blood loss, and no postoperative morbidity and mortality were observed in the two groups. However, a significantly lower pain score was observed in the patients undergoing LC with local anesthesia infusion at 1 h after LC and at discharge. Regarding analgesic use, the amount of meperidine used 1 h after LC and the total used during admission were lower in patients undergoing LC with local anesthesia infusion. This group also had a shorter hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Local anesthesia with ropivacaine at the port site in LC patients significantly decreased postoperative pain immediately. This explains the lower meperidine use and earlier discharge for these patients.
Authors: J S Barkun; A N Barkun; J S Sampalis; G Fried; B Taylor; M J Wexler; C A Goresky; J L Meakins Journal: Lancet Date: 1992-11-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: A J McMahon; I T Russell; J N Baxter; S Ross; J R Anderson; C G Morran; G Sunderland; D Galloway; G Ramsay; P J O'Dwyer Journal: Lancet Date: 1994-01-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ailbhe M McDermott; Kah Hoong Chang; Kelly Mieske; Peter F McAnena; Brian Kinirons; Abdelaly Abeidi; Brian H Harte; Michael J Kerin; Oliver J McAnena Journal: World J Surg Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Shengping Lin; Jie Hua; Bin Xu; Tingsong Yang; Zhigang He; Chenglei Xu; Hongbo Meng; Bo Zhou; Zhenshun Song Journal: Int J Clin Exp Med Date: 2015-08-15