Literature DB >> 19452225

Abdominosacral amputation of the rectum for low rectal cancers: ten years of experience.

Marek Bebenek1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer is related to the high frequency of local recurrences, risk of inadvertent bowel perforation, and disease-positive tumor margin. An alternative technique to this procedure, however, is the abdominosacral amputation of the rectum (ASAR). The aim of this study was to report on the technique and share our experience of ASAR on the cohort of consecutively operated patients.
METHODS: In its anterior stage, ASAR follows the rules of total mesorectal excision. In its posterior part, the patient is positioned in a prone jackknife position and the coccyx and the last sacral vertebra (if necessary) are removed, enabling a sharp and directly visualized resection of the tumor and other structures critical to local recurrence. Between 1998 and 2007, a total of 210 low-rectal cancer patients were so treated at our clinic.
RESULTS: Bowel perforation occurred in 9 patients, the circumferential resection margin was positive in 16 patients, and 38 patients had local wound complications. Seven (4.4%) of 158 patients with 2-year follow-up developed local recurrence, whereas 5-year observed and relative survivals were 68.3% and 73.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: ASAR has a low risk of bowel perforation, circumferential resection margin involvement, and local wound complications. The local recurrence rate is lower and survival better than with conventional abdominoperineal resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19452225     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0517-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  11 in total

1.  Therapeutic results of abdominoperineal resection in the prone jackknife position for T3-4 low rectal cancers.

Authors:  Xiang Hu; Liang Cao; Jian Zhang; Pin Liang; Ge Liu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Current practice in abdominoperineal resection: an email survey of the membership of the Association of Coloproctology.

Authors:  N Dabbas; K Adams; H Chave; G Branagan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Intra-operative perforation: a risk factor for prognosis of low rectal cancer after abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  Xing-Mao Zhang; Jun-Li Dai; Sheng-Hui Ma; Jian-Wei Liang; Zheng Wang; Jian-Jun Bi; Zhi-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 4.  Perineal reconstruction after extra-levator abdominoperineal excision (eLAPE): a systematic review.

Authors:  Hisham Z Butt; Murtaza K Salem; Badri Vijaynagar; Sanjay Chaudhri; Baljit Singh
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer--a systematic overview.

Authors:  Sigmar Stelzner; Carsta Koehler; Juliane Stelzer; Anja Sims; Helmut Witzigmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Preoperative treatment does not improve the therapeutic results of abdominosacral amputation of the rectum.

Authors:  Marek Bębenek; Wiesław Tupikowski; Karol Cisarż; Alicja Balcerzak; Leszek Wojciechowski; Anna Stankowska; Radosław Tarkowski
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Short-term outcomes of the modified extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer (with videos).

Authors:  Eun Jung Park; Seung Hyuk Baik; Jeonghyun Kang; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim; Seung-Kook Sohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: short-term outcomes of a prospective case series.

Authors:  S L Kipling; K Young; J D Foster; N J Smart; A E Hunter; E Cooper; N K Francis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Intraoperative blood loss during surgical treatment of low-rectal cancer by abdominosacral resection is higher than during extra-levator abdominosacral amputation of the rectum.

Authors:  Marek Bębenek
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.318

10.  Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study).

Authors:  Gijsbert D Musters; Willem A Bemelman; Robbert J I Bosker; Jacobus W A Burger; Peter van Duijvendijk; Boudewijn van Etten; Anna A W van Geloven; Eelco J R de Graaf; Christiaan Hoff; Niels de Korte; Jeroen W A Leijtens; Harm J T Rutten; Baljit Singh; Anthony van de Ven; Ronald J C L M Vuylsteke; Johannes H W de Wilt; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Pieter J Tanis
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.