Literature DB >> 19450840

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma risk according to tumor size.

R Houston Thompson1, Jennifer R Hill, Yuriy Babayev, Angel Cronin, Matt Kaag, Shilajit Kundu, Melanie Bernstein, Jonathan Coleman, Guido Dalbagni, Karim Touijer, Paul Russo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent evidence suggests significantly discordant findings regarding tumor size and the metastasis risk in renal cell carcinoma cases. We present our experience with renal cell carcinoma. We evaluated the association between tumor size and the metastasis risk in a large patient cohort.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using our prospectively maintained nephrectomy database we identified 2,691 patients who were treated surgically for a sporadic renal cortical tumor between 1989 and 2008. Associations between tumor size and synchronous metastasis at presentation (M1 renal cell carcinoma) were evaluated with logistic regression models. Metastasis-free survival after surgery was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method in 2,367 patients who did not present with M1 renal cell carcinoma and were followed postoperatively.
RESULTS: Of the 2,691 patients 162 presented with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Only 1 of 781 patients with a tumor less than 3 cm had M1 renal cell carcinoma at presentation and tumor size was significantly associated with metastasis at presentation (for each 1 cm increase OR 1.25, p <0.001). Of the 2,367 patients who did not present with metastasis metastatic disease developed in 171 during a median 2.8-year followup. In this group only 1 of the 720 patients with renal cell carcinoma less than 3 cm showed de novo metastasis during followup. Metastasis-free survival was significantly associated with tumor size (for each 1 cm increase HR 1.24, p <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In our experience tumor size is significantly associated with synchronous and asynchronous metastases after nephrectomy. Our results suggest that the risk of metastatic disease is negligible in patients with tumors less than 3 cm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19450840      PMCID: PMC2735023          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  18 in total

1.  Nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4 cm. or less in diameter: indicated or under treated?

Authors:  H Wunderlich; O Reichelt; S Schumann; A Schlichter; H Kosmehl; W Werner; R Vollandt; J Schubert
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  A postoperative prognostic nomogram predicting recurrence for patients with conventional clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Maximiliano Sorbellini; Michael W Kattan; Mark E Snyder; Victor Reuter; Robert Motzer; Manlio Goetzl; James McKiernan; Paul Russo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Comparison of outcomes in elective partial vs radical nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma of 4-7 cm.

Authors:  Atreya Dash; Andrew J Vickers; Lee R Schachter; Ariadne M Bach; Mark E Snyder; Paul Russo
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  [The significance of tumor diameter in renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  A Herrlinger; G Schott; W Schafhauser; K M Schrott
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature.

Authors:  Sam N Chawla; Paul L Crispen; Alexandra L Hanlon; Richard E Greenberg; David Y T Chen; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma--is tumor size a suitable parameter for indication?

Authors:  J Miller; C Fischer; R Freese; M Altmannsberger; W Weidner
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Independent validation of the 2002 American Joint Committee on cancer primary tumor classification for renal cell carcinoma using a large, single institution cohort.

Authors:  Igor Frank; Michael L Blute; Bradley C Leibovich; John C Cheville; Christine M Lohse; Horst Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: the SSIGN score.

Authors:  Igor Frank; Michael L Blute; John C Cheville; Christine M Lohse; Amy L Weaver; Horst Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  The relationship between renal tumor size and metastases in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease.

Authors:  Branden G Duffey; Peter L Choyke; Gladys Glenn; Robert L Grubb; David Venzon; W Marston Linehan; McClellan M Walther
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  External validation of the Mayo Clinic Stage, Size, Grade and Necrosis (SSIGN) score to predict cancer specific survival using a European series of conventional renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Guido Martignoni; Christine Lohse; Giacomo Novara; Maurizio Pea; Stefano Cavalleri; Walter Artibani
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  51 in total

1.  Oncological outcomes of partial nephrectomy for multifocal renal cell carcinoma greater than 4 cm.

Authors:  Gopal N Gupta; James Peterson; Kailash N Thakore; Peter A Pinto; W Marston Linehan; Gennady Bratslavsky
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  [Small renal cell carcinoma-active surveillance and ablation].

Authors:  J J Wendler; R Damm; U-B Liehr; T Brunner; M Pech; M Schostak
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Metastatic renal cell carcinoma mimicking diverticulitis in a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Authors:  S M Hwang; J M Kuyava; J P Grande; K M Swetz
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-01-07

4.  Active surveillance for small renal masses.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Elias S Hyams; Jeffrey K Mullins; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2012

Review 5.  Solid renal masses: what the numbers tell us.

Authors:  Stella K Kang; William C Huang; Pari V Pandharipande; Hersh Chandarana
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  A Randomized Study of Patient Risk Perception for Incidental Renal Findings on Diagnostic Imaging Tests.

Authors:  Stella K Kang; Laura D Scherer; Alec J Megibow; Leslie J Higuita; Nathanael Kim; R Scott Braithwaite; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  The value of superb microvascular imaging in differentiating benign renal mass from malignant renal tumor: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yiran Mao; Jie Mu; Jing Zhao; Lihui Zhao; Xiaojie Xin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  [Standard surgery for small renal masses (<4 cm)].

Authors:  S K Frees; R Mager; H Borgmann; W Jäger; C Thomas; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  [Ablative therapy of small renal masses].

Authors:  M C Kriegmair; N Wagener; S J Diehl; N Rathmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  Evaluation, diagnosis and surveillance of renal masses in the setting of VHL disease.

Authors:  Jad Chahoud; Melissa McGettigan; Nainesh Parikh; Ronald S Boris; Othon Iliopoulos; W Kimryn Rathmell; Anthony B Daniels; Eric Jonasch; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.