| Literature DB >> 19450024 |
Trix Cacchione1, Josep Call, Robert Zingg.
Abstract
Three experiments modeled after infant studies were run on four great ape species (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus) to investigate their reasoning about solidity and gravity constraints. The aims were: (a) to find out if great apes are subject to gravity biased search or display sensitivity for object solidity, (b) to check for species differences, and (c) to assess if a gravity hypothesis or more parsimonious explanations best account for failures observed. Results indicate that great apes, unlike monkeys, show no reliable gravity bias, that ape species slightly differ in terms of their performance, and that the errors made are best explained by a gravity account. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19450024 DOI: 10.1037/a0013580
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Comp Psychol ISSN: 0021-9940 Impact factor: 2.231