Literature DB >> 19449167

Genome-wide analysis of recombination machinery for spliceosomal introns gain.

Haidong Tan1.   

Abstract

What caused spliceosomal introns gain remains an unsolved problem. To this, defining what spliceosomal introns arise from is critical. Here, the introns density of the genomes is calculated for four species, indicating:(1) sex chromosomes in mammals have lower intron densities, (2) despite that, the proportion of UTRs (untranslated regions) with introns in sex chromosomes is higher than other ones, and (3) AT content of introns is more similar to that of intergenic regions when these regions comprise the majority of a chromosome, and more similar to that of exons, when exons are the majority of the chromosome. On the other hand, introns have been clearly demonstrated to invade genetic sequences in recent times while sex chromosomes evolved from a pair of autosomes within the last 300 millions years. One main difference between sex chromosomes and autosomes in mammalian is that sex chromosomes recombination stopped. Thus, recombination might be the main determinant for eukaryotes gaining spliceosomal introns. To further prove that and avoid giving weak signal, the whole genomes from eight eukaryotic species are analyzed and present strong signal for above the trend (3) in three species (t-test, P = 0.55 for C. elegans, P = 0.72 for D. melanogaster and P = 0.83 for A. thaliana). These results suggest that the genome-wide coincidence as above (3) can only be caused by the large-scale random unequal crossover in eukaryote meiosis, which might have fueled spliceosomal introns but hardly occurred in prokaryotes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19449167     DOI: 10.1007/s11033-009-9557-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Rep        ISSN: 0301-4851            Impact factor:   2.316


  38 in total

1.  SEGE: A database on 'intron less/single exonic' genes from eukaryotes.

Authors:  Meena K Sakharkar; Pandjassarame Kangueane; Dmitri A Petrov; A S Kolaskar; S Subbiah
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Intron exclusion and the mystery of intron loss.

Authors:  Kejin Hu
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 4.124

3.  Power estimation of the t test for detecting differential gene expression.

Authors:  Alexander Begun
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.410

4.  Regulating the formation of DNA double-strand breaks in meiosis.

Authors:  Hajime Murakami; Scott Keeney
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Absence of extensive recombination between inter- and intraspecies mitochondrial DNA in mammalian cells.

Authors:  J Hayashi; Y Tagashira; M C Yoshida
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.905

6.  Four evolutionary strata on the human X chromosome.

Authors:  B T Lahn; D C Page
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-29       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Structure and activities of group II introns.

Authors:  F Michel; J L Ferat
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 23.643

8.  Unequal crossing over at the rRNA tandon as a source of quantitative genetic variation in Drosophila.

Authors:  R Frankham; D A Briscoe; R K Nurthen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The fine-scale structure of recombination rate variation in the human genome.

Authors:  Gilean A T McVean; Simon R Myers; Sarah Hunt; Panos Deloukas; David R Bentley; Peter Donnelly
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Nucleomorph genome of Hemiselmis andersenii reveals complete intron loss and compaction as a driver of protein structure and function.

Authors:  Christopher E Lane; Krystal van den Heuvel; Catherine Kozera; Bruce A Curtis; Byron J Parsons; Sharen Bowman; John M Archibald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.