Literature DB >> 19447684

An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

William C Watters1, Christopher M Bono, Thomas J Gilbert, D Scott Kreiner, Daniel J Mazanec, William O Shaffer, Jamie Baisden, John E Easa, Robert Fernand, Gary Ghiselli, Michael H Heggeness, Richard C Mendel, Conor O'Neill, Charles A Reitman, Daniel K Resnick, Jeffrey T Summers, Reuben B Timmons, John F Toton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The objective of the North American Spine Society (NASS) evidence-based clinical guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is to provide evidence-based recommendations on key clinical questions concerning the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. The guideline is intended to address these questions based on the highest quality clinical literature available on this subject as of January 2007. The goal of the guideline recommendations is to assist the practitioner in delivering optimum, efficacious treatment of and functional recovery from this common disorder.
PURPOSE: To provide an evidence-based, educational tool to assist spine care providers in improving the quality and efficiency of care delivered to patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. STUDY
DESIGN: Systematic review and evidence-based clinical guideline.
METHODS: This report is from the Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Work Group of the NASS Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline Development Committee. The work group was comprised of multidisciplinary spine care specialists, all of whom were trained in the principles of evidence-based analysis. Each member participated in the development of a series of clinical questions to be addressed by the group. The final questions agreed on by the group are the subject of this report. A literature search addressing each question and using a specific search protocol was performed on English language references found in MEDLINE, EMBASE (Drugs and Pharmacology) and four additional, evidence-based, databases. The relevant literature was then independently rated by at least three reviewers using the NASS-adopted standardized levels of evidence. An evidentiary table was created for each of the questions. Final grades of recommendation for the answer to each clinical question were arrived at via face-to-face meetings among members of the work group using standardized grades of recommendation. When Level I-IV evidence was insufficient to support a recommendation to answer a specific clinical question, expert consensus was arrived at by the work group through the modified nominal group technique and is clearly identified as such in the guideline.
RESULTS: Nineteen clinical questions were formulated, addressing issues of prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. The answers to these 19 clinical questions are summarized in this document. The respective recommendations were graded by the strength of the supporting literature that was stratified by levels of evidence.
CONCLUSIONS: A clinical guideline for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis has been created using the techniques of evidence-based medicine and using the best available evidence as a tool to aid practitioners involved with the care of this condition. The entire guideline document, including the evidentiary tables, suggestions for future research, and all references, is available electronically at the NASS Web site (www.spine.org) and will remain updated on a timely schedule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19447684     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  39 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for adult spondylolisthesis: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Florian Ringel; Markus Quante; Sven O Eicker; Cathleen Muche-Borowski; Ralph Kothe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Minimally invasive laminectomy in spondylolisthetic lumbar stenosis.

Authors:  Ilias N Caralopoulos; Cuong J Bui
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

Review 3.  Epidemiology of spine care: the back pain dilemma.

Authors:  Janna Friedly; Christopher Standaert; Leighton Chan
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.784

Review 4.  Development of appropriateness criteria for the surgical treatment of symptomatic lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS).

Authors:  A F Mannion; V Pittet; F Steiger; J-P Vader; H-J Becker; F Porchet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Surgery in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: indications, outcomes and complications. A systematic review.

Authors:  F Steiger; H-J Becker; C J Standaert; F Balague; J-P Vader; F Porchet; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Multilevel mini-open TLIFs and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: description of a simple technical nuance used to increase intraoperative safety and improve workflow. Tips and tricks and review of the literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe M V Barbagallo; Francesco Certo; Massimiliano Visocchi; Giovanni Sciacca; Mario Piccini; Vincenzo Albanese
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 7.  The evidence on surgical interventions for low back disorders, an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Wilco C H Jacobs; Sidney M Rubinstein; Paul C Willems; Wouter A Moojen; Ferran Pellisé; Cumhur F Oner; Wilco C Peul; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  How do coverage policies influence practice patterns, safety, and cost of initial lumbar fusion surgery? A population-based comparison of workers' compensation systems.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Gary M Franklin; Richard A Deyo; Thomas M Wickizer; Jonathan D Lurie; Sohail K Mirza
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 9.  Interventional spine procedures for management of chronic low back pain-a primer.

Authors:  Jason D Iannuccilli; Ethan A Prince; Gregory M Soares
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.513

10.  Risk factors for early reherniation after lumbar discectomy with or without annular closure: results of a multicenter randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Jenny C Kienzler; Javier Fandino; Erik Van de Kelft; Sandro Eustacchio; Gerrit Joan Bouma
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.