Literature DB >> 19446969

MNT and MutaMouse studies to define the in vivo dose response relations of the genotoxicity of EMS and ENU.

Elmar Gocke1, Mark Ballantyne, James Whitwell, Lutz Müller.   

Abstract

Although there are a multitude of in vitro and in vivo studies on the genotoxic activity of EMS, no lifetime carcinogenicity studies, repeat dose mutation data or exposure analysis are available to serve as a solid basis for risk assessment for human exposure cases. The present studies were undertaken to investigate whether a threshold for mutagenic and clastogenic activity in vivo could be established, using the bone marrow micronucleus (MNT) and MutaMouse test systems, in the hope to provide reassurance to the patients that their accidental exposure to EMS at doses up to 0.055 mg/kg did not carry a toxicological risk. Dose levels ranging from 1.25 to 260 mg/kg/day were applied orally for up to 28 days. As a reference we included ENU at doses of 1.1-22 mg/kg/day. Our studies showed that daily doses of up to 25mg/kg/day (bone marrow, GI tract) and 50 mg/kg/day (liver) did not induce mutations in the lacZ gene in the three organs tested. Doses up to 80mg/kg/day (7-day dosing regime) did not induce micronuclei in mouse bone marrow. The genotoxic activity of EMS became apparent only at higher dose levels. Dose fractionation of EMS (28 times 12.5mg/kg versus a single high dose 350 mg/kg) provided further evidence for the thresholded dose response of EMS and showed that no cumulation of gene mutations below a threshold was occurring. In contrast, for ENU no threshold was apparent and dose fractionation indicated full additivity of individual dose effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19446969     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  9 in total

1.  Defining EMS and ENU dose-response relationships using the Pig-a mutation assay in rats.

Authors:  Krista L Dobo; Ronald D Fiedler; William C Gunther; Catherine J Thiffeault; Zoryana Cammerer; Stephanie L Coffing; Thomas Shutsky; Maik Schuler
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 2.  Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Andrea Hartwig; Michael Arand; Bernd Epe; Sabine Guth; Gunnar Jahnke; Alfonso Lampen; Hans-Jörg Martus; Bernhard Monien; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Simone Schmitz-Spanke; Gerlinde Schriever-Schwemmer; Pablo Steinberg; Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Refractory status epilepticus, serious rhabdomyolysis, acute liver injury, and pancytopenia after a massive intake of ethyl methanesulfonate: a case report.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yamazaki; Shogo Tajima; Takahiro Takeuchi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

4.  Is nelfinavir exposure associated with cancer incidence in HIV-positive individuals?

Authors:  David C Boettiger; Caroline A Sabin; Andrew Grulich; Lene Ryom; Fabrice Bonnet; Peter Reiss; Antonella d'arminio Monforte; Ole Kirk; Andrew Phillips; Mark Bower; Gerd Fätkenheuer; Jens D Lundgren; Matthew Law
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 4.177

5.  Miniaturized flow cytometric in vitro micronucleus assay represents an efficient tool for comprehensively characterizing genotoxicity dose-response relationships.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Jeffrey C Bemis; Souk Phonethepswath; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Elevated ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) in nelfinavir mesylate (Viracept, Roche): overview.

Authors:  Anton Pozniak; Lutz Müller; Miklos Salgo; Judith K Jones; Peter Larson; David Tweats
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 2.250

7.  Comparing BMD-derived genotoxic potency estimations across variants of the transgenic rodent gene mutation assay.

Authors:  John W Wills; George E Johnson; Hannah L Battaion; Wout Slob; Paul A White
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  The development and prevalidation of an in vitro mutagenicity assay based on MutaMouse primary hepatocytes, Part II: Assay performance for the identification of mutagenic chemicals.

Authors:  Julie A Cox; Edwin P Zwart; Mirjam Luijten; Paul A White
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Clinical trial considerations on male contraception and collection of pregnancy information from female partner: update.

Authors:  Maria Longauer Banholzer; Christoph Wandel; Paul Barrow; Marie Mannino; Georg Schmitt; Melanie Guérard; Lutz Müller; Gerard Greig; Kenjie Amemiya; Richard Peck; Thomas Singer; Lucette Doessegger
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2016-07-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.