Literature DB >> 19446641

fMRI at 1.5, 3 and 7 T: characterising BOLD signal changes.

Wietske van der Zwaag1, Susan Francis, Kay Head, Andrew Peters, Penny Gowland, Peter Morris, Richard Bowtell.   

Abstract

Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal changes occurring during execution of a simple motor task were measured at field strengths of 1.5, 3 and 7 T using multi-slice, single-shot, gradient echo EPI at a resolution of 1x1x3 mm(3), to quantify the benefits offered by ultra-high magnetic field for functional MRI. Using four different echo times at each field strength allowed quantification of the relaxation rate, R(2)* and the change in relaxation rate on activation, DeltaR(2)*. This work adds to previous studies of the field strength dependence of BOLD signal characteristics, through its: (i) focus on motor rather than visual cortex; (ii) use of single-shot, multi-slice, gradient echo EPI for data acquisition; (iii) co-registration of images acquired at different field strengths to allow assessment of the BOLD signal changes in the same region at each field strength. DeltaR(2)* was found to increase linearly with field strength (0.51+/-0.06 s(-1) at 1.5 T; 0.98+/-0.08 s(-1) at 3 T; 2.55+/-0.22 s(-1) at 7 T), while the ratio of DeltaR(2)*/R(2), which dictates the accessible BOLD contrast was also found to increase (0.042+/-0.002 at 1.5 T; 0.054+/-0.002 at 3 T; 0.084+/-0.003 at 7 T). The number of pixels classified as active, the t-value calculated over a common region of interest and the percentage signal change in the same region were all found to peak at TE approximately T(2)* and increase significantly with field strength. An earlier onset of the haemodynamic response at higher field provides some evidence for a reduced venous contribution to the BOLD signal at 7 T.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19446641     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  98 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the utility of 1.5 versus 3 Tesla magnetic resonance brain imaging in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Joanna M Wardlaw; Will Brindle; Ana M Casado; Kirsten Shuler; Moira Henderson; Brenda Thomas; Jennifer Macfarlane; Susana Muñoz Maniega; Katherine Lymer; Zoe Morris; Cyril Pernet; William Nailon; Trevor Ahearn; Abdul Nashirudeen Mumuni; Carlos Mugruza; John McLean; Goultchira Chakirova; Yuehui Terry Tao; Johanna Simpson; Andrew C Stanfield; Harriet Johnston; Jehill Parikh; Natalie A Royle; Janet De Wilde; Mark E Bastin; Nick Weir; Andrew Farrall; Maria C Valdes Hernandez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  In vivo structural imaging of the cerebellum, the contribution of ultra-high fields.

Authors:  José P Marques; Rolf Gruetter; Wietske van der Zwaag
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging at ultrahigh fields.

Authors:  Kamil Ugurbil
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  More than BOLD: Dual-spin populations create functional contrast.

Authors:  Amanda J Taylor; Jung H Kim; Vimal Singh; Elizabeth J Halfen; Josef Pfeuffer; David Ress
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-18       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Family history of alcohol use disorders and neuromaturation: a functional connectivity study with adolescents.

Authors:  Andrea D Spadoni; Alan N Simmons; Tony T Yang; Susan F Tapert
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.829

Review 6.  [Functional magnetic resonance imaging with ultra-high fields].

Authors:  C Windischberger; F P S Fischmeister; V Schöpf; R Sladky; E Moser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Resting state connectivity of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis at ultra-high field.

Authors:  Salvatore Torrisi; Katherine O'Connell; Andrew Davis; Richard Reynolds; Nicholas Balderston; Julie L Fudge; Christian Grillon; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Physiological noise in human cerebellar fMRI.

Authors:  Wietske van der Zwaag; João Jorge; Denis Butticaz; Rolf Gruetter
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 9.  Clinical 7-T MRI for neuroradiology: strengths, weaknesses, and ongoing challenges.

Authors:  Brian J Burkett; Andrew J Fagan; Joel P Felmlee; David F Black; John I Lane; John D Port; Charlotte H Rydberg; Kirk M Welker
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Shared Numerosity Representations Across Formats and Tasks Revealed with 7 Tesla fMRI: Decoding, Generalization, and Individual Differences in Behavior.

Authors:  Eric D Wilkey; Benjamin N Conrad; Darren J Yeo; Gavin R Price
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.