Literature DB >> 19446469

Mercury and human genotoxicity: critical considerations and possible molecular mechanisms.

Maria Elena Crespo-López1, Gisele L Macêdo, Susana I D Pereira, Gabriela P F Arrifano, Domingos L W Picanço-Diniz, José Luiz M do Nascimento, Anderson M Herculano.   

Abstract

Mercury compounds versatility explains their numerous applications in diverse areas of industry. The growing use of this metal has resulted in a significant increase of environment contamination and episodes of human intoxication, arousing the concern of international organisms. Meanwhile, consequences of these intoxication outbreaks are still not fully understood, especially if we consider long-term effects of chronic exposure to relatively low levels of mercury compounds. In the present manuscript, studies about the genotoxicity of mercury compounds, performed in vitro, in vivo, and/or including epidemiologic studies of human populations were reviewed. Some mercury compounds are known as teratogenic agents, especially affecting the normal development of the central nervous system; however, the connection between mercury exposure and carcinogenesis remains controversial. Since 1990s, epidemiological studies have begun to include an increasing number of human subjects, making the results more reliable: thus, increased genotoxicity was demonstrated in human populations exposed to mercury through diet, occupation or by carrying dental fillings. In fact, concentrations of methylmercury causing significant genotoxic alterations in vitro below both safety limit and concentration were associated with delayed psychomotor development with minimal signs of methylmercury poisoning. Based on mercury's known ability to bind sulfhydryl groups, several hypotheses were raised about potential molecular mechanisms for the metal genotoxicity. Mercury may be involved in four main processes that lead to genotoxicity: generation of free radicals and oxidative stress, action on microtubules, influence on DNA repair mechanisms and direct interaction with DNA molecules. All data reviewed here contributed to a better knowledge of the widespread concern about the safety limits of mercury exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19446469     DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2009.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Res        ISSN: 1043-6618            Impact factor:   7.658


  41 in total

1.  Effects of methyl and inorganic mercury exposure on genome homeostasis and mitochondrial function in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Lauren H Wyatt; Anthony L Luz; Xiou Cao; Laura L Maurer; Ashley M Blawas; Alejandro Aballay; William K Y Pan; Joel N Meyer
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-02-13

2.  Blood concentrations of lead, cadmium, mercury and their association with biomarkers of DNA oxidative damage in preschool children living in an e-waste recycling area.

Authors:  Xijin Xu; Weitang Liao; Yucong Lin; Yifeng Dai; Zhihua Shi; Xia Huo
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Assessment of Pb, Cd and Hg soil contamination and its potential to cause cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in human cell lines (CaCo-2 and HaCaT).

Authors:  Maida Sljivic Husejnovic; Martina Bergant; Sasa Jankovic; Suzana Zizek; Aida Smajlovic; Adaleta Softic; Omer Music; Biljana Antonijevic
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Oral exposure to methylmercury modifies the prostatic microenvironment in adult rats.

Authors:  Daniela A Fossato da Silva; Fernando Barbosa; Wellerson R Scarano
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Assessment of mitochondrial DNA damage in little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) collected near a mercury-contaminated river.

Authors:  Natalie K Karouna-Renier; Carl White; Christopher R Perkins; John J Schmerfeld; David Yates
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Mercury chloride exposure induces DNA damage, reduces fertility, and alters somatic and germline cells in Drosophila melanogaster ovaries.

Authors:  Luis Humberto Mojica-Vázquez; Diana Madrigal-Zarraga; Rocío García-Martínez; Muriel Boube; María Elena Calderón-Segura; Justine Oyallon
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Predictors of mitochondrial DNA copy number and damage in a mercury-exposed rural Peruvian population near artisanal and small-scale gold mining: An exploratory study.

Authors:  Axel J Berky; Ian T Ryde; Beth Feingold; Ernesto J Ortiz; Lauren H Wyatt; Caren Weinhouse; Heileen Hsu-Kim; Joel N Meyer; William K Pan
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  Total mercury in fresh and processed tuna marketed in Galicia (NW Spain) in relation to dietary exposure.

Authors:  M Ángeles García; Ricardo Núñez; Julián Alonso; M Julia Melgar
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Comparative study of mercury speciation in commercial fishes of the Brazilian Amazon.

Authors:  R C Rodríguez Martín-Doimeadios; J J Berzas Nevado; F J Guzmán Bernardo; M Jiménez Moreno; G P F Arrifano; A M Herculano; J L M do Nascimento; M E Crespo-López
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Probing mercury(II)-DNA interactions by nanopore stochastic sensing.

Authors:  Guihua Wang; Qitao Zhao; Xiaofeng Kang; Xiyun Guan
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.