Literature DB >> 19444334

Proximate industrial activity and psychological distress.

Jason D Boardman1, Liam Downey, James S Jackson, J Bryce Merrill, Jarron M Saint Onge, David R Williams.   

Abstract

This paper examines the role that gender, occupational status, and family status play in moderating the effect of industrial activity on the psychological well-being of nearby residents. Using a unique spatial assessment of industrial activity and an environmental risk/social stressor framework in conjunction with individual-level data from the Detroit Area Study (DAS) and demographic data from the U.S. census, we find that residents of neighborhoods in close proximity to industrial activity report elevated levels of psychological distress compared to residents of neighborhoods removed from this type of activity. These influences are more pronounced among women but gender differences are also contingent upon occupational and family statuses. We show that specific combinations of work and family statuses make persons particularly vulnerable to the influence of this environmental stressor and women are two and a half times more likely than men to have these vulnerable statuses. This study makes an important contribution to the environmental health literature because it reminds researchers of the fundamental influence of social roles when examining the link between environmental risks and mental health.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19444334      PMCID: PMC2681300          DOI: 10.1007/s11111-008-0075-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Popul Environ        ISSN: 0199-0039


  19 in total

Review 1.  Socioeconomic status and health: the potential role of environmental risk exposure.

Authors:  Gary W Evans; Elyse Kantrowitz
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  Unfair treatment, neighborhood effects, and mental health in the Detroit metropolitan area.

Authors:  A Schulz; D Williams; B Israel; A Becker; E Parker; S A James; J Jackson
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2000-09

3.  Screening for serious mental illness in the general population.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Peggy R Barker; Lisa J Colpe; Joan F Epstein; Joseph C Gfroerer; Eva Hiripi; Mary J Howes; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Ronald W Manderscheid; Ellen E Walters; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2003-02

4.  The neighborhood context of adolescent mental health.

Authors:  C S Aneshensel; C A Sucoff
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1996-12

5.  Environmental stressors: the mental health impacts of living near industrial activity.

Authors:  Liam Downey; Marieke Van Willigen
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2005-09

6.  The performance of the K6 and K10 screening scales for psychological distress in the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being.

Authors:  T A Furukawa; R C Kessler; T Slade; G Andrews
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.723

7.  Evaluation of 2 measures of psychological distress as screeners for depression in the general population.

Authors:  John Cairney; Scott Veldhuizen; Terrance J Wade; Paul Kurdyak; David L Streiner
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.356

8.  Predictive gender and education bias in Kessler's psychological distress Scale (k10).

Authors:  Andrew J Baillie
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2005-09-05       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 9.  Stress, coping, and social support processes: where are we? What next?

Authors:  P A Thoits
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1995

10.  The stress process.

Authors:  L I Pearlin; M A Lieberman; E G Menaghan; J T Mullan
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1981-12
View more
  4 in total

1.  Aggravating conditions: cynical hostility and neighborhood ambient stressors.

Authors:  Katherine King
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Environmental Quality and Fertility: The Effects of Plant Density, Species Richness, and Plant Diversity on Fertility Limitation.

Authors:  Sarah R Brauner-Otto
Journal:  Popul Environ       Date:  2014-09

Review 3.  A review of the epidemiological methods used to investigate the health impacts of air pollution around major industrial areas.

Authors:  Mathilde Pascal; Laurence Pascal; Marie-Laure Bidondo; Amandine Cochet; Hélène Sarter; Morgane Stempfelet; Vérène Wagner
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2013-06-02

4.  Increase in fertility following coal and oil power plant retirements in California.

Authors:  Joan A Casey; Alison Gemmill; Deborah Karasek; Elizabeth L Ogburn; Dana E Goin; Rachel Morello-Frosch
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 5.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.