BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Predictive models of outcome after ischemic stroke have incorporated acute diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) information with mixed results. We hypothesized that serial measurements of DWI infarct volume would be predictive of functional outcome after ischemic stroke. METHODS: The prospective Acute Stroke Accurate Prediction (ASAP) Study included a prespecified serial imaging subgroup who underwent DWI studies at baseline (<24 hours after symptom onset) and Day 5 (+/-2 days). DWI infarct volumes were calculated using the Analyze software (Rochester, Minn). Clinical outcomes were assessed at 3 months. Univariate and multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between change in DWI lesion volume and excellent neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0, 1, and Barthel Index >or=95). RESULTS: In total, 169 cases from the ASAP study had serial DWI scans with a measurable lesion at baseline, follow-up, or both. The median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 6 (interquartile range, 3 to 13). For each 10 cm(3) of growth in DWI infarct volume, the OR for achieving an excellent outcome by modified Rankin Scale was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.71) and for the Barthel Index was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.79). Adjusting for clinically important covariates, the OR for an excellent modified Rankin Scale outcome was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.88) and excellent Barthel Index outcome was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.56 to 1.01). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, the likelihood of achieving an excellent neurological outcome diminishes substantially with growth in DWI infarct volume in the first 5 days after ischemic stroke of mild to moderate severity.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Predictive models of outcome after ischemic stroke have incorporated acute diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) information with mixed results. We hypothesized that serial measurements of DWI infarct volume would be predictive of functional outcome after ischemic stroke. METHODS: The prospective Acute Stroke Accurate Prediction (ASAP) Study included a prespecified serial imaging subgroup who underwent DWI studies at baseline (<24 hours after symptom onset) and Day 5 (+/-2 days). DWI infarct volumes were calculated using the Analyze software (Rochester, Minn). Clinical outcomes were assessed at 3 months. Univariate and multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between change in DWI lesion volume and excellent neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0, 1, and Barthel Index >or=95). RESULTS: In total, 169 cases from the ASAP study had serial DWI scans with a measurable lesion at baseline, follow-up, or both. The median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 6 (interquartile range, 3 to 13). For each 10 cm(3) of growth in DWI infarct volume, the OR for achieving an excellent outcome by modified Rankin Scale was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.71) and for the Barthel Index was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.79). Adjusting for clinically important covariates, the OR for an excellent modified Rankin Scale outcome was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.88) and excellent Barthel Index outcome was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.56 to 1.01). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, the likelihood of achieving an excellent neurological outcome diminishes substantially with growth in DWI infarct volume in the first 5 days after ischemic stroke of mild to moderate severity.
Authors: A E Baird; J Dambrosia; S Janket; Q Eichbaum; C Chaves; B Silver; P A Barber; M Parsons; D Darby; S Davis; L R Caplan; R E Edelman; S Warach Journal: Lancet Date: 2001-06-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: C Oppenheim; R Stanescu; D Dormont; S Crozier; B Marro; Y Samson; G Rancurel; C Marsault Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Karen C Johnston; Douglas P Wagner; Xin-Qun Wang; George C Newman; Vincent Thijs; Souvik Sen; Steven Warach Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-04-19 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Josep Puig; S Pedraza; G Blasco; J Daunis-I-Estadella; A Prats; F Prados; I Boada; M Castellanos; J Sánchez-González; S Remollo; G Laguillo; A M Quiles; E Gómez; J Serena Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Thomas W K Battey; Mahima Karki; Aneesh B Singhal; Ona Wu; Saloomeh Sadaghiani; Bruce C V Campbell; Stephen M Davis; Geoffrey A Donnan; Kevin N Sheth; W Taylor Kimberly Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-10-21 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Shadi Yaghi; Charlotte Herber; Amelia K Boehme; Howard Andrews; Joshua Z Willey; Sara K Rostanski; Matthew Siket; Mahesh V Jayaraman; Ryan A McTaggart; Karen L Furie; Randolph S Marshall; Ronald M Lazar; Bernadette Boden-Albala Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: T Tourdias; P Renou; I Sibon; J Asselineau; L Bracoud; M Dumoulin; F Rouanet; J M Orgogozo; V Dousset Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-10-21 Impact factor: 3.825