UNLABELLED: 6-(18)F-fluoro-l-dopa ((18)F-FDOPA) is widely used to investigate dopaminergic hypofunction, for instance, in Parkinson disease (PD). Conventionally, a 90-min scan with either a graphical or a metabolite-purified plasma input approach has been used for quantification. In the clinical setting, to increase compliance, especially in patients with more advanced disease, and to increase the efficacy of tracer and scanner time use, a shorter acquisition and a simple quantitative analysis are desirable. Taking into account the asymmetry of clinical symptoms and the uneven distribution of striatal dopaminergic hypofunction may also improve the use of (18)F-FDOPA PET in early disease detection. Therefore, we compared subregional striatal (18)F-FDOPA PET data from a large group of nonmedicated patients with early PD and a set of healthy elderly volunteers to find out whether a simple ratio approach would reliably separate PD patients from healthy controls. METHODS: A total of 89 nonmedicated patients with early PD and 21 healthy volunteers were studied with (18)F-FDOPA PET, and both a region-to-reference (striatal-to-occipital) ratio (SOR) calculated from 75 to 90 min after injection and a graphical analysis of data calculated from 15 to 90 min after (18)F-FDOPA injection (yielding the influx constant [K(i)(ref)]) were used. RESULTS: Both SOR and K(i)(ref) values in the PD patients were lowest, relative to those in the healthy controls, in the posterior putamen contralateral to the side with predominant clinical symptoms. The contralateral posterior putamen showed the largest areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve-0.994 for SOR and 0.998 for K(i)(ref)-indicating excellent separation of the PD and control groups. The caudate nucleus and the ventral striatum were less impressive in this respect. CONCLUSION: A single 15-min scan 75 min after tracer injection seems to be sufficient for separating patients with PD from healthy controls in a clinical research environment. This method represents a powerful and economical alternative for research on the disease mechanism and differential diagnosis.
UNLABELLED: 6-(18)F-fluoro-l-dopa ((18)F-FDOPA) is widely used to investigate dopaminergic hypofunction, for instance, in Parkinson disease (PD). Conventionally, a 90-min scan with either a graphical or a metabolite-purified plasma input approach has been used for quantification. In the clinical setting, to increase compliance, especially in patients with more advanced disease, and to increase the efficacy of tracer and scanner time use, a shorter acquisition and a simple quantitative analysis are desirable. Taking into account the asymmetry of clinical symptoms and the uneven distribution of striatal dopaminergic hypofunction may also improve the use of (18)F-FDOPA PET in early disease detection. Therefore, we compared subregional striatal (18)F-FDOPA PET data from a large group of nonmedicated patients with early PD and a set of healthy elderly volunteers to find out whether a simple ratio approach would reliably separate PDpatients from healthy controls. METHODS: A total of 89 nonmedicated patients with early PD and 21 healthy volunteers were studied with (18)F-FDOPA PET, and both a region-to-reference (striatal-to-occipital) ratio (SOR) calculated from 75 to 90 min after injection and a graphical analysis of data calculated from 15 to 90 min after (18)F-FDOPA injection (yielding the influx constant [K(i)(ref)]) were used. RESULTS: Both SOR and K(i)(ref) values in the PDpatients were lowest, relative to those in the healthy controls, in the posterior putamen contralateral to the side with predominant clinical symptoms. The contralateral posterior putamen showed the largest areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve-0.994 for SOR and 0.998 for K(i)(ref)-indicating excellent separation of the PD and control groups. The caudate nucleus and the ventral striatum were less impressive in this respect. CONCLUSION: A single 15-min scan 75 min after tracer injection seems to be sufficient for separating patients with PD from healthy controls in a clinical research environment. This method represents a powerful and economical alternative for research on the disease mechanism and differential diagnosis.
Authors: I Lopes Alves; Sanne K Meles; Antoon Tm Willemsen; Rudi A Dierckx; Ana M Marques da Silva; Klaus L Leenders; Michel Koole Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Arnoldo Piccardo; Roberto Cappuccio; Gianluca Bottoni; Diego Cecchin; Luca Mazzella; Alessio Cirone; Sergio Righi; Martina Ugolini; Pietro Bianchi; Pietro Bertolaccini; Elena Lorenzini; Michela Massollo; Antonio Castaldi; Francesco Fiz; Laura Strada; Angelina Cistaro; Massimo Del Sette Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Aaron F Struck; Lance T Hall; Joanna E Kusmirek; Catherine L Gallagher; John M Floberg; Christine J Jaskowiak; Scott B Perlman Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-10-15
Authors: Sinn-Rithy Toch; Sylvain Poussier; Emilien Micard; Marc Bertaux; Axel Van Der Gucht; Elodie Chevalier; Pierre-Yves Marie; Eric Guedj; Antoine Verger Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Charles R Conway; John T Chibnall; Paul Cumming; Mark A Mintun; Marie Anne I Gebara; Dana C Perantie; Joseph L Price; Martha E Cornell; Jonathan E McConathy; Sunil Gangwani; Yvette I Sheline Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2014-01-14 Impact factor: 3.222