Literature DB >> 19443503

The kin structure of sexual interactions.

A F G Bourke1.   

Abstract

The origin of sexual reproduction involved the evolution of zygotes from separate genomes and, like other social processes, should therefore be amenable to analysis using kin selection theory. I consider how kin structure affects sexual interactions in three contexts--the evolution of sexual reproduction, sex allocation and sexual conflict. Kin structure helps explain the even-handed replication of paternal and maternal genes under outbreeding. Under inbreeding, it predicts altruistic failure to replicate by one half of the diploid genome. Kin structure predicts optimal sex ratios and potential conflicts over sex ratio within social groups and individuals. Sexual conflict predictably occurs as a function of (i) the probability that current sexual partners will reproduce together in future and (ii) between-partner relatedness. I conclude that systematically analysing the kin structure of sexual interactions helps illuminate their evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19443503      PMCID: PMC2781946          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  19 in total

1.  Sexual cooperation: mating increases longevity in ant queens.

Authors:  Alexandra Schrempf; Jürgen Heinze; Sylvia Cremer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Cooperation should not be assumed.

Authors:  John M McNamara; Ken Binmore; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Perspective: maternal kin groups and the origins of asymmetric genetic systems-genomic imprinting, haplodiploidy, and parthenogenesis.

Authors:  Benjamin B Normark
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 4.  Evolutionary explanations for cooperation.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Ashleigh S Griffin; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Genetic scrambling as a defence against meiotic drive.

Authors:  D Haig; A Grafen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1991-12-21       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 6.  Why sex and recombination?

Authors:  N H Barton; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The cost of sex in relation to mating system.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1980-06-21       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Extraordinary sex ratios. A sex-ratio theory for sex linkage and inbreeding has new implications in cytogenetics and entomology.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-04-28       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 10.  Evolutionary conflicts of interest between males and females.

Authors:  Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sexual conflict and sex allocation.

Authors:  Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Males harm females less when competing with familiar relatives.

Authors:  Samuel J Lymbery; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sex-biased demography modulates male harm across the genome.

Authors:  Thomas J Hitchcock; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.