Literature DB >> 19443408

Mutation status of K-ras, p53 and allelic losses at 9p and 18q are not prognostic markers in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Cyril Salek1, Petra Minarikova, Lucie Benesova, Vladimir Nosek, Robin Strnad, Miroslav Zavoral, Marek Minarik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: K-ras mutations and allelic losses of tumor suppressors p16 and DPC4 are perceived as potential markers for screening of pancreatic malignancy. In this study, molecular data is compared with survival statistics of the patients and whether they correlate with patients' prognosis is questioned. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty three consecutive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (stage III and IV) who underwent EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) were enrolled into the study (28 males, 25 females, 63+/-10.5 years). Samples were evaluated on-site for presence of malignant cells. DNA was extracted from Giemsa stained smears using laser microdissection, and mutation status of K-ras and p53 was tested by cycling-gradient capillary electrophoresis (CGCE). In addition, allelic losses of tumor suppressor genes p16 (INK4, CDKN2A) and DPC4 (MADH4, SMAD4) were detected by monitoring the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at 9p and 18q loci. Molecular data were compared with survival statistics using Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: The median survival in K-ras positive group was 7.0+/-2.4 months (95% CI 2.3-11.7) and in K-ras negative group was 10.0+/-0.6 months (95% CI 8.7-11.3). The median survival in p53 positive group was 10.0+/-2.2 months (95% CI 5.6-14.4) and in p53 negative group was 6.0+/-2.5 months (95% CI 1.1-10.9). The median survival in LOH 9p positive group was 9.0+/-5.1 months (95% CI 0-18.9), in LOH 9p negatives was 10.0+/-5.0 months (95% CI 0.2-19.8). The median survival in LOH 18q positive group was 10.0+/-4.2 months (95% CI 1.8-18.2) and in LOH 18q negative group was 3.0+/-1.3 months (95% CI 0.5-5.5). After the adjustment for age using Cox proportional hazards model, none of the evaluated molecular markers was shown to be an independent prognostic marker for survival of patients with pancreatic cancer.
CONCLUSION: None of the studied molecular markers was identified as an independent factor determining survival prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19443408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  14 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration and useful ancillary methods.

Authors:  Mario Tadic; Tajana Stoos-Veic; Rajko Kusec
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Advances in biomarker research for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kruttika Bhat; Fengfei Wang; Qingyong Ma; Qinyu Li; Sanku Mallik; Tze-Chen Hsieh; Erxi Wu
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.116

3.  Loss of 18q22.3 involving the carboxypeptidase of glutamate-like gene is associated with poor prognosis in resected pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Jih-Hsiang Lee; Elisa Giovannetti; Jin-Hyeok Hwang; Iacopo Petrini; Qiuyan Wang; Johannes Voortman; Yonghong Wang; Seth M Steinberg; Niccola Funel; Paul S Meltzer; Yisong Wang; Giuseppe Giaccone
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Clinical significance of the genetic landscape of pancreatic cancer and implications for identification of potential long-term survivors.

Authors:  Shinichi Yachida; Catherine M White; Yoshiki Naito; Yi Zhong; Jacqueline A Brosnan; Anne M Macgregor-Das; Richard A Morgan; Tyler Saunders; Daniel A Laheru; Joseph M Herman; Ralph H Hruban; Alison P Klein; Siân Jones; Victor Velculescu; Christopher L Wolfgang; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  The molecular targets for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Alexios S Strimpakos; Kostas N Syrigos; Muhammad Wasif Saif
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 4.519

6.  Detection and Quantification of ctDNA for Longitudinal Monitoring of Treatment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Using a Universal Mutant Detection Assay by Denaturing Capillary Electrophoresis.

Authors:  Lucie Benesova; Renata Ptackova; Tereza Halkova; Anastasiya Semyakina; Martin Svaton; Ondrej Fiala; Milos Pesek; Marek Minarik
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.874

7.  Identification of microRNA-21 as a biomarker for chemoresistance and clinical outcome following adjuvant therapy in resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Jin-Hyeok Hwang; Johannes Voortman; Elisa Giovannetti; Seth M Steinberg; Leticia G Leon; Yong-Tae Kim; Niccola Funel; Joo Kyung Park; Min A Kim; Gyeong Hoon Kang; Sun-Whe Kim; Marco Del Chiaro; Godefridus J Peters; Giuseppe Giaccone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Pancreatico-biliary endoscopic ultrasound: a systematic review of the levels of evidence, performance and outcomes.

Authors:  Pietro Fusaroli; Dimitrios Kypraios; Giancarlo Caletti; Mohamad A Eloubeidi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  K-Ras mutation detection in liquid biopsy and tumor tissue as prognostic biomarker in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Li; Yuanting Zheng; Hong Sun; Rongyuan Zhuang; Jing Liu; Tianshu Liu; Weimin Cai
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Comparison of Native Aspirates and Cytological Smears Obtained by EUS-Guided Biopsies for Effective DNA/RNA Marker Testing in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Lucie Benesova; Tereza Halkova; Bohus Bunganic; Barbora Belsanova; Miroslav Zavoral; Eva Traboulsi; Marek Minarik
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.201

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.