BACKGROUND: Despite a common view that women are better at self-care, there is very little evidence to support or challenge this perspective in the heart failure (HF) population. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if there are cross-cultural gender differences in self-reported HF self-care and to describe gender differences in the determinants of HF self-care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A secondary analysis was completed of cross-sectional study data collected on 2082 adults with chronic HF from the United States, Australia and Thailand. METHODS: Comparisons were made between men and women regarding self-care maintenance, management and confidence as assessed by the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index, as well as the proportion of subjects engaged in adequate self-care. Multivariate comparisons were made to determine if gender explained sufficient variance in HF self-care and the likelihood of reporting adequate self-care, controlling for nine model covariates. RESULTS: The sample was comprised of 1306 men and 776 women. Most (73.5%) had systolic or mixed systolic and diastolic HF and 45% had New York Heart Association class III or IV HF. Although small and clinically insignificant gender differences were found in self-care maintenance, gender was not a determinant of any aspect of HF self-care in multivariate models. Married women were 37% less likely to report adequate self-care maintenance than unmarried women. Comorbidities only influenced the HF self-care of men. Being newly diagnosed with HF also primarily affected men. Patients with diastolic HF (predominantly women) had poorer self-care maintenance and less confidence in self-care. CONCLUSION: Differences in HF self-care are attributable to factors other than gender; however, there are several gender-specific determinants of HF self-care that help identify patients at risk for practicing poor self-care.
BACKGROUND: Despite a common view that women are better at self-care, there is very little evidence to support or challenge this perspective in the heart failure (HF) population. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if there are cross-cultural gender differences in self-reported HF self-care and to describe gender differences in the determinants of HF self-care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A secondary analysis was completed of cross-sectional study data collected on 2082 adults with chronic HF from the United States, Australia and Thailand. METHODS: Comparisons were made between men and women regarding self-care maintenance, management and confidence as assessed by the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index, as well as the proportion of subjects engaged in adequate self-care. Multivariate comparisons were made to determine if gender explained sufficient variance in HF self-care and the likelihood of reporting adequate self-care, controlling for nine model covariates. RESULTS: The sample was comprised of 1306 men and 776 women. Most (73.5%) had systolic or mixed systolic and diastolic HF and 45% had New York Heart Association class III or IV HF. Although small and clinically insignificant gender differences were found in self-care maintenance, gender was not a determinant of any aspect of HF self-care in multivariate models. Married women were 37% less likely to report adequate self-care maintenance than unmarried women. Comorbidities only influenced the HF self-care of men. Being newly diagnosed with HF also primarily affected men. Patients with diastolic HF (predominantly women) had poorer self-care maintenance and less confidence in self-care. CONCLUSION: Differences in HF self-care are attributable to factors other than gender; however, there are several gender-specific determinants of HF self-care that help identify patients at risk for practicing poor self-care.
Authors: Barbara Riegel; Andrea Driscoll; Jom Suwanno; Debra K Moser; Terry A Lennie; Misook L Chung; Jia-Rong Wu; Victoria Vaughan Dickson; Beverly Carlson; Jan Cameron Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2009-03-14 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Barbara Riegel; Beverly Carlson; Debra K Moser; Marge Sebern; Frank D Hicks; Virginia Roland Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Elizabeth A Bayliss; John F Steiner; Douglas H Fernald; Lori A Crane; Deborah S Main Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2003 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: R Oosterom-Calo; A J van Ballegooijen; C B Terwee; S J te Velde; I A Brouwer; T Jaarsma; J Brug Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 4.214
Authors: Abdullah S Alhurani; Rebecca L Dekker; Mona A Abed; Amani Khalil; Marwa H Al Zaghal; Kyoung Suk Lee; Gia Mudd-Martin; Martha J Biddle; Terry A Lennie; Debra K Moser Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 2.386
Authors: Alexander M Clark; Patricia Davidson; Kay Currie; Mehri Karimi; Amanda S Duncan; David R Thompson Journal: Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med Date: 2010-01
Authors: Elliane Irani; Scott Emory Moore; Ronald L Hickman; Mary A Dolansky; Richard A Josephson; Joel W Hughes Journal: J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2019 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 2.083
Authors: Terry A Lennie; Debra K Moser; Martha J Biddle; Darlene Welsh; Geza G Bruckner; D Travis Thomas; Mary Kay Rayens; Alison L Bailey Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 2.228