BACKGROUND: Self-care is believed to improve outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. However, research testing this assumption is hampered by difficulties in measuring self-care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a revised instrument measuring self-care in persons with HF, the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI). The SCHFI is a self-report measure comprised of 15 items rated on a 4-point response scale and divided into 3 subscales. METHODS AND RESULTS: Psychometric testing was done using data from 760 HF patients (age 70.36 +/- 12.3 years, 51% male) from 7 sites in the United States. Reliability of the SCHFI (alpha.76) was adequate. Reliability of the Self-Care Maintenance subscale was lower than desired (alpha.56) but the reliability of the other subscales was adequate: Self-Care Management (alpha.70) and Self-Care Self-Confidence (alpha.82). Construct validity was supported with satisfactory model fit on confirmatory factor analysis (NFI=.69, CFI.73). Construct validity was supported further with significant total and subscale (all P <.05) differences between patients experienced with HF and those newly diagnosed, consistent with the underlying theory. CONCLUSION: Low reliability of the Self-Care Maintenance subscale was expected because the items reflect behaviors known to vary in individuals. The reliability and validity of the SCHFI are sufficient to support its use in clinical research.
BACKGROUND: Self-care is believed to improve outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. However, research testing this assumption is hampered by difficulties in measuring self-care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a revised instrument measuring self-care in persons with HF, the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI). The SCHFI is a self-report measure comprised of 15 items rated on a 4-point response scale and divided into 3 subscales. METHODS AND RESULTS: Psychometric testing was done using data from 760 HF patients (age 70.36 +/- 12.3 years, 51% male) from 7 sites in the United States. Reliability of the SCHFI (alpha.76) was adequate. Reliability of the Self-Care Maintenance subscale was lower than desired (alpha.56) but the reliability of the other subscales was adequate: Self-Care Management (alpha.70) and Self-Care Self-Confidence (alpha.82). Construct validity was supported with satisfactory model fit on confirmatory factor analysis (NFI=.69, CFI.73). Construct validity was supported further with significant total and subscale (all P <.05) differences between patients experienced with HF and those newly diagnosed, consistent with the underlying theory. CONCLUSION: Low reliability of the Self-Care Maintenance subscale was expected because the items reflect behaviors known to vary in individuals. The reliability and validity of the SCHFI are sufficient to support its use in clinical research.
Authors: Patricia Flatley Brennan; Gail R Casper; Laura J Burke; Kathy A Johnson; Roger Brown; Rupa S Valdez; Marge Sebern; Oscar A Perez; Billie Sturgeon Journal: Heart Lung Date: 2010 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.210
Authors: Andrew Sherwood; James A Blumenthal; Gary G Koch; Benson M Hoffman; Lana L Watkins; Patrick J Smith; Christopher M O'Connor; Kirkwood F Adams; Joseph G Rogers; Carla Sueta; Patricia P Chang; Kristy S Johnson; Jeanne Schwartz; Alan L Hinderliter Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Susan C McMillan; Brent J Small; William E Haley; Cheryl Zambroski; Harleah G Buck Journal: J Hosp Palliat Nurs Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 1.918
Authors: Sandra B Dunbar; Brittany Butts; Carolyn M Reilly; Rebecca A Gary; Melinda K Higgins; Erin P Ferranti; Steven D Culler; Javed Butler Journal: Nurs Outlook Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Christopher S Lee; Barbara Riegel; Andrea Driscoll; Jom Suwanno; Debra K Moser; Terry A Lennie; Victoria V Dickson; Jan Cameron; Linda Worrall-Carter Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2009-05-13 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Robert C Wu; Kevin Thorpe; Heather Ross; Vaska Micevski; Christine Marquez; Sharon E Straus Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2009-02-06 Impact factor: 5.428