Literature DB >> 19442886

Outcome after aortic valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis without contractile reserve on dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Christophe Tribouilloy1, Franck Lévy, Dan Rusinaru, Pascal Guéret, Hélène Petit-Eisenmann, Serge Baleynaud, Yannick Jobic, Catherine Adams, Bernard Lelong, Agnès Pasquet, Christophe Chauvel, Damien Metz, Jean-Paul Quéré, Jean-Luc Monin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether aortic valve replacement (AVR) is associated with improved survival in patients with severe low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis (LF/LGAS) without contractile reserve (CR) on dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE).
BACKGROUND: Patients with LF/LGAS without CR have a high mortality rate with conservative therapy. The benefit of AVR in this subset of patients remains controversial.
METHODS: Eighty-one consecutive patients with symptomatic calcified LF/LGAS (valve area <or=1 cm(2), left ventricular ejection fraction <or=40%, mean pressure gradient [MPG] <or=40 mm Hg) without CR on DSE were enrolled. Absence of CR was defined as the absence of increase in stroke volume of >or=20% compared with the baseline value. Multivariable analysis and propensity scores were used to compare survival according to whether or not AVR was performed (n = 55).
RESULTS: Five-year survival was higher in AVR patients compared with medically managed patients (54 +/- 7% vs. 13 +/- 7%, p = 0.001) despite a high operative mortality of 22% (n = 12). An AVR was independently associated with lower 5-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio from 0.16 to 5.21 varying with time [95% confidence interval: 0.12-3.16 to 0.21-8.50], p = 0.00026). In 42 propensity-matched patients, 5-year survival was markedly improved by AVR (65 +/- 11% vs. 11 +/- 7%, p = 0.019). Associated bypass surgery (p = 0.007) and MPG <or=20 mm Hg (p = 0.035) were independently predictive of operative mortality. Late survival after AVR (excluding operative death) was 69 +/- 8% at 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LF/LGAS without CR on DSE, AVR is associated with better outcome compared with medical management. Surgery should not be withheld from this subset of patients solely on the basis of lack of CR on DSE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19442886     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  52 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in Aortic Valve Stenosis: Low-Flow States Diagnosis, Management, and a Review of the Current Literature.

Authors:  Matthew W Sherwood; Todd L Kiefer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Evaluation of aortic stenosis: an update--including low-flow States, myocardial mechanics, and stress testing.

Authors:  Luc A Pierard; Raluca Dulgheru
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Futility, benefit, and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Karen P Alexander; Patrick T O'Gara; Jonathan Afilalo
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 11.195

4.  Invasive hemodynamic assessments during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: comparison of patient outcomes in higher vs. lower transvalvular gradients with respect to left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Jury Schewel; Dimitry Schewel; Christian Frerker; Peter Wohlmuth; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Ulrich Schäfer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Outcomes From Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Less Than 30%: A Substudy From the TOPAS-TAVI Registry.

Authors:  Frédéric Maes; Stamatios Lerakis; Henrique Barbosa Ribeiro; Martine Gilard; João L Cavalcante; Raj Makkar; Howard C Herrmann; Stephan Windecker; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Asim N Cheema; Luis Nombela-Franco; Ignacio Amat-Santos; Antonio J Muñoz-García; Bruno Garcia Del Blanco; Alan Zajarias; John C Lisko; Salim Hayek; Vasilis Babaliaros; Florent Le Ven; Thomas G Gleason; Tarun Chakravarty; Wilson Szeto; Marie-Annick Clavel; Alberto de Agustin; Vicenç Serra; John T Schindler; Abdellaziz Dahou; Mohammed Salah-Annabi; Emilie Pelletier-Beaumont; Melanie Côté; Rishi Puri; Philippe Pibarot; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 14.676

6.  Long term results and predictors of left ventricular function recovery after aortic valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Saisho; Koichi Arinaga; Satoshi Kikusaki; Yuichiro Hirata; Kumiko Wada; Tatsuyuki Kakuma; Hiroyuki Tanaka
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 7.  Low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis-Still a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

Authors:  Anja Vogelgesang; Gerd Hasenfuss; Claudius Jacobshagen
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 8.  [Low flow/low gradient aortic valve stenosis : clinical and diagnostic management].

Authors:  S Herrmann; M Niemann; S Störk; K Hu; W Voelker; G Ertl; F Weidemann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 1.443

9.  Assessment of Aortic Valve Disease: Role of Imaging Modalities.

Authors:  Romain Capoulade; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-11

Review 10.  Low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Julien Magne; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.