Literature DB >> 19442676

Mu wave suppression during the perception of meaningless syllables: EEG evidence of motor recruitment.

Stephen Crawcour1, Andrew Bowers, Ashley Harkrider, Tim Saltuklaroglu.   

Abstract

Motor involvement in speech perception has been recently studied using a variety of techniques. In the current study, EEG measurements from Cz, C3 and C4 electrodes were used to examine the relative power of the mu rhythm (i.e., 8-13 Hz) in response to various audio-visual speech and non-speech stimuli, as suppression of these rhythms is considered an index of 'mirror neuron' (i.e., motor) activity. Fourteen adult native English speaking females watched and listened to nine audio-video stimuli clips assembled from three different auditory stimuli (speech, noise, and pure tone) combined with three different video stimuli (speech, noise, and kaleidoscope-made from scrambling an image from the visual speech). Relative to the noise-noise (baseline condition), all visual speech conditions resulted in significant levels of suppression, a finding that is consistent with previous reports of mirror activity to visual speech and mu suppression to 'biological' stimuli. None of the non-speech conditions or conditions in which speech was presented via audition only resulted in any significant suppression of the mu rhythm in this population. Thus, visual speech perception appears to be more closely associated with motor activity than acoustic speech perception. It is postulated that in this study, the processing demands incurred by the task were insufficient for inducing significant mu suppression via acoustic speech only. The findings are discussed in theoretical contexts of speech perception and the mirror system. We suggest that this technique may offer a cost-efficient, non-invasive technique for measuring motor activity during speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19442676     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  10 in total

1.  Phasic stabilization of motor output after auditory and visual distractors.

Authors:  Harri Piitulainen; Mathieu Bourguignon; Eero Smeds; Xavier De Tiège; Veikko Jousmäki; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  EEG Mu (µ) rhythm spectra and oscillatory activity differentiate stuttering from non-stuttering adults.

Authors:  Tim Saltuklaroglu; Ashley W Harkrider; David Thornton; David Jenson; Tiffani Kittilstved
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Audio and visual speech emotion activate the left pre-supplementary motor area.

Authors:  Joseph Rovetti; Fran Copelli; Frank A Russo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Attention modulates motor system activation during action observation: evidence for inhibitory rebound.

Authors:  Stefanie Schuch; Andrew P Bayliss; Christoph Klein; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Suppression of the µ rhythm during speech and non-speech discrimination revealed by independent component analysis: implications for sensorimotor integration in speech processing.

Authors:  Andrew Bowers; Tim Saltuklaroglu; Ashley Harkrider; Megan Cuellar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sensorimotor Oscillations Prior to Speech Onset Reflect Altered Motor Networks in Adults Who Stutter.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Mersov; Cecilia Jobst; Douglas O Cheyne; Luc De Nil
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  The interpretation of mu suppression as an index of mirror neuron activity: past, present and future.

Authors:  Hannah M Hobson; Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Motor engagement relates to accurate perception of phonemes and audiovisual words, but not auditory words.

Authors:  Kelly Michaelis; Makoto Miyakoshi; Gina Norato; Andrei V Medvedev; Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-01-25

9.  Listening to the human voice alters sensorimotor brain rhythms.

Authors:  Yohana Lévêque; Daniele Schön
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Temporal dynamics of sensorimotor integration in speech perception and production: independent component analysis of EEG data.

Authors:  David Jenson; Andrew L Bowers; Ashley W Harkrider; David Thornton; Megan Cuellar; Tim Saltuklaroglu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.