James E Pease1, Richard Horuk. 1. Faculty of Medicine National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine, Leukocyte Biology Section, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK. j.pease@imperial.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chemokines were originally defined as host defense proteins, however, their biological role goes well beyond this simple description of their function as immune cell chemoattractants, and they have since been shown to be involved in a number of other biological processes, including growth regulation, hematopoiesis, embryologic development, angiogenesis, and HIV-1 infection. Because of their diverse role in autoimmune diseases and AIDS, chemokines and their receptors, which belong to the G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily, have been considered good drug targets by the pharmaceutical industry. OBJECTIVE/ METHOD: In the first part of this two-part review, we highlight recent developments in the chemokine receptor antagonist field both in the peer reviewed and in the patent literature for the CC chemokine receptors CCR1, CCR2, CCR3, and CCR4. CONCLUSION: A number of chemokine receptor antagonists have made the transition from lead compounds to clinical candidates, some of which are described here. Although there has been no clinical success yet for antagonists targeting the group of receptors discussed here, the compounds have been invaluable in generating information that should pave the way for producing successful therapeutics in the future.
BACKGROUND: Chemokines were originally defined as host defense proteins, however, their biological role goes well beyond this simple description of their function as immune cell chemoattractants, and they have since been shown to be involved in a number of other biological processes, including growth regulation, hematopoiesis, embryologic development, angiogenesis, and HIV-1 infection. Because of their diverse role in autoimmune diseases and AIDS, chemokines and their receptors, which belong to the G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily, have been considered good drug targets by the pharmaceutical industry. OBJECTIVE/ METHOD: In the first part of this two-part review, we highlight recent developments in the chemokine receptor antagonist field both in the peer reviewed and in the patent literature for the CC chemokine receptors CCR1, CCR2, CCR3, and CCR4. CONCLUSION: A number of chemokine receptor antagonists have made the transition from lead compounds to clinical candidates, some of which are described here. Although there has been no clinical success yet for antagonists targeting the group of receptors discussed here, the compounds have been invaluable in generating information that should pave the way for producing successful therapeutics in the future.
Authors: Hannah X Chu; Thiruma V Arumugam; Mathias Gelderblom; Tim Magnus; Grant R Drummond; Christopher G Sobey Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Chu-Biao Xue; Anlai Wang; Qi Han; Yingxin Zhang; Ganfeng Cao; Hao Feng; Taisheng Huang; Changsheng Zheng; Michael Xia; Ke Zhang; Lingquan Kong; Joseph Glenn; Rajan Anand; David Meloni; D J Robinson; Lixin Shao; Lou Storace; Mei Li; Robert O Hughes; Rajesh Devraj; Philip A Morton; D Joseph Rogier; Maryanne Covington; Peggy Scherle; Sharon Diamond; Tom Emm; Swamy Yeleswaram; Nancy Contel; Kris Vaddi; Robert Newton; Greg Hollis; Brian Metcalf Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 4.345
Authors: Edgardo Laborde; Robert W Macsata; Fanying Meng; Brian T Peterson; Louise Robinson; Steve R Schow; Reyna J Simon; Hua Xu; Kunihisa Baba; Hideaki Inagaki; Yoshiro Ishiwata; Takahito Jomori; Yukiharu Matsumoto; Atsushi Miyachi; Takashi Nakamura; Masayuki Okamoto; Tracy M Handel; Claude C A Bernard Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: A Gilchrist; T D Gauntner; A Fazzini; K M Alley; D S Pyen; J Ahn; S J Ha; A Willett; S E Sansom; J L Yarfi; K A Bachovchin; M R Mazzoni; J R Merritt Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 8.739