Literature DB >> 19440880

Effect of restricting access to a suicide jumping site.

Keren Skegg1, Peter Herbison.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The road to a headland that had become a suicide jumping hotspot was temporarily closed because of construction work. This created an opportunity to assess whether loss of vehicular access would lead to a reduction in suicides and emergency police callouts for threatened suicide at the site.
METHOD: Deaths at the headland were ascertained for a 10 year period before road closure and for 2 years following closure using records from the local police inquest officer, the coroner's pathologist and Marine Search and Rescue. Police provided a list of police callouts for threatened suicide at the site for a 4 year period before closure and for 2 years following closure. Simple rates were compared and incident rate ratios were calculated where possible.
RESULTS: There were 13 deaths at the headland involving suicide or open verdicts in the 10 years before access was restricted, and none in the 2 years following road closure. This difference was statistically significant (incident rate difference = 1.3 deaths per year, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.6-2.0). No jumping suicides occurred elsewhere in the police district following the road closure. Police callouts for threatened suicide also fell significantly, from 19.3 per year in the 4 years prior to road closure to 9.5 per year for the following 2 years (incident rate ratio = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.2-3.5).
CONCLUSIONS: Preventing vehicular access to a suicide jumping hotspot was an effective means of suicide prevention at the site. There was no evidence of substitution to other jumping sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19440880     DOI: 10.1080/00048670902873698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0004-8674            Impact factor:   5.744


  6 in total

Review 1.  Means restriction for suicide prevention.

Authors:  Paul S F Yip; Eric Caine; Saman Yousuf; Shu-Sen Chang; Kevin Chien-Chang Wu; Ying-Yeh Chen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Means restriction for the prevention of suicide by jumping.

Authors:  Chukwudi Okolie; Suzanne Wood; Keith Hawton; Udai Kandalama; Alexander C Glendenning; Michael Dennis; Sian F Price; Keith Lloyd; Ann John
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-25

3.  Meta-analysis of incidence rate data in the presence of zero events.

Authors:  Matthew J Spittal; Jane Pirkis; Lyle C Gurrin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Comparing Different Suicide Prevention Measures at Bridges and Buildings: Lessons We Have Learned from a National Survey in Switzerland.

Authors:  Alexander Hemmer; Philipp Meier; Thomas Reisch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cost-effectiveness of Installing Barriers at Bridge and Cliff Sites for Suicide Prevention in Australia.

Authors:  Piumee Bandara; Jane Pirkis; Angela Clapperton; Sangsoo Shin; Lay San Too; Lennart Reifels; Sandersan Onie; Andrew Page; Karl Andriessen; Karolina Krysinska; Anna Flego; Marisa Schlichthorst; Matthew J Spittal; Cathrine Mihalopoulos; Long Khanh-Dao Le
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-04-01

Review 6.  Interventions to reduce suicides at suicide hotspots: a systematic review.

Authors:  Georgina R Cox; Christabel Owens; Jo Robinson; Angela Nicholas; Anne Lockley; Michelle Williamson; Yee Tak Derek Cheung; Jane Pirkis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.