Literature DB >> 19439597

Motor cortex bilateral motor representation depends on subcortical and interhemispheric interactions.

Marcel Brus-Ramer1, Jason B Carmel, John H Martin.   

Abstract

The corticospinal tract is a predominantly crossed pathway. Nevertheless, the primary motor cortex (M1) is activated bilaterally during unilateral movements and several animal studies showed that M1 has a bilateral motor representation. A better understanding of the uncrossed corticospinal system is especially important for elucidating its role in recovery of limb control after unilateral injury. We used intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) to determine the representation of contralateral and ipsilateral forelimb joints at single M1 sites in the rat. Most sites representing an ipsilateral joint corepresented the same joint contralaterally. We next determined whether ipsilateral responses evoked in one hemisphere depended on the function of M1 in the opposite hemisphere using reversible inactivation and pyramidal tract lesion. Ipsilateral responses were eliminated when the homotopic forelimb area of M1 in the opposite hemisphere was inactivated or when the pyramidal tract on the nonstimulated side was sectioned. To determine the role of transfer between M1 in each hemisphere we sectioned the corpus callosum, which produced a 33% increase in ipsilateral ICMS thresholds. Neither M1 inactivation nor callosal section changed contralateral response thresholds, indicating the absence of tonic excitatory or inhibitory drive to the opposite M1. Finally, ipsilateral responses following M1 inactivation and pyramidal tract lesion could be evoked after systemic administration of the K(+) channel blocker 4-aminopyridine, suggesting the presence of latent connections. Our findings show important interactions between the corticospinal systems from each side, especially at the spinal level. This has important implications for recruiting the ipsilateral corticospinal system after injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19439597      PMCID: PMC2715912          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5852-08.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  46 in total

1.  Compensatory sprouting and impulse rerouting after unilateral pyramidal tract lesion in neonatal rats.

Authors:  W J Z'Graggen; K Fouad; O Raineteau; G A Metz; M E Schwab; G L Kartje
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction.

Authors:  R S Marshall; G M Perera; R M Lazar; J W Krakauer; R C Constantine; R L DeLaPaz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Differential activity-dependent development of corticospinal control of movement and final limb position during visually guided locomotion.

Authors:  K M Friel; T Drew; J H Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  The spinal pathophysiology of spasticity--from a basic science point of view.

Authors:  J B Nielsen; C Crone; H Hultborn
Journal:  Acta Physiol (Oxf)       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.311

5.  Electrical stimulation of spared corticospinal axons augments connections with ipsilateral spinal motor circuits after injury.

Authors:  Marcel Brus-Ramer; Jason B Carmel; Samit Chakrabarty; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Bilateral activity-dependent interactions in the developing corticospinal system.

Authors:  Kathleen M Friel; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Spontaneous corticospinal axonal plasticity and functional recovery after adult central nervous system injury.

Authors:  N Weidner; A Ner; N Salimi; M H Tuszynski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Interhemispheric facilitation of the hand motor area in humans.

Authors:  R Hanajima; Y Ugawa; K Machii; H Mochizuki; Y Terao; H Enomoto; T Furubayashi; Y Shiio; H Uesugi; I Kanazawa
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Constraint-induced movement therapy in the adult rat after unilateral corticospinal tract injury.

Authors:  Irin C Maier; Kaspar Baumann; Michaela Thallmair; Oliver Weinmann; Jeannette Scholl; Martin E Schwab
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Pyramidal tract stimulation restores normal corticospinal tract connections and visuomotor skill after early postnatal motor cortex activity blockade.

Authors:  Iran Salimi; Kathleen M Friel; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  51 in total

1.  Forelimb training drives transient map reorganization in ipsilateral motor cortex.

Authors:  David T Pruitt; Ariel N Schmid; Tanya T Danaphongse; Kate E Flanagan; Robert A Morrison; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Cortical Reorganization of Sensorimotor Systems and the Role of Intracortical Circuits After Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Hisham Mohammed; Edmund R Hollis
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  Electrical stimulation of motor cortex in the uninjured hemisphere after chronic unilateral injury promotes recovery of skilled locomotion through ipsilateral control.

Authors:  Jason B Carmel; Hiroki Kimura; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Clinically Relevant Levels of 4-Aminopyridine Strengthen Physiological Responses in Intact Motor Circuits in Rats, Especially After Pyramidal Tract Injury.

Authors:  Anil Sindhurakar; Asht M Mishra; Disha Gupta; Jennifer F Iaci; Tom J Parry; Jason B Carmel
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Spinal cord direct current stimulation differentially modulates neuronal activity in the dorsal and ventral spinal cord.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Possible Contributions of Ipsilateral Pathways From the Contralesional Motor Cortex to the Voluntary Contraction of the Spastic Elbow Flexors in Stroke Survivors: A TMS Study.

Authors:  Yen-Ting Chen; Shengai Li; Craig DiTommaso; Ping Zhou; Sheng Li
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.159

7.  Targeted mini-strokes produce changes in interhemispheric sensory signal processing that are indicative of disinhibition within minutes.

Authors:  Majid H Mohajerani; Khatereh Aminoltejari; Timothy H Murphy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Preclinical and Clinical Evidence on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Projections: Implication for Motor Recovery.

Authors:  Ali Alawieh; Stephen Tomlinson; DeAnna Adkins; Steve Kautz; Wuwei Feng
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2017-07-09       Impact factor: 6.829

9.  Rapid and persistent impairments of the forelimb motor representations following cervical deafferentation in rats.

Authors:  Yu-Qiu Jiang; Preston T J A Williams; John H Martin
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Specificity of neuronal responses in primary visual cortex is modulated by interhemispheric corticocortical input.

Authors:  Kerstin E Schmidt; Stephen G Lomber; Giorgio M Innocenti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.