AIM: A limitation of cell therapy for heart disease is the fact that stem cells injected directly into the myocardium are capable of entering the vasculature and migrating to remote organs. We determined whether retention of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the infarcted myocardium could be improved by implanting the cells in a collagen matrix. METHODS: A myocardial infarction was induced by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery in Fischer rats. A total of 7 days after myocardial infarction, saline (n = 12), saline plus 2 million bone marrow-derived rat MSCs labeled with isotopic colloidal nanoparticles containing europium (n = 13), collagen (n = 13) or collagen plus 2 million labeled MSCs (n = 13) were directly injected into the infarcted myocardium. Tissues from the infarcted myocardium, noninfarcted myocardium, lung, liver, spleen and kidney were sampled 4 weeks later. Distribution of grafted MSCs was quantitatively analyzed by measuring the nanoparticle radioactivity in these tissues. Cardiac function was assessed by left ventriculography. RESULTS: There were zero nanoparticles detected in the tissues that received saline or collagen alone into the heart. Nanoparticles were detected in the heart and remote organs in the saline plus MSC group. Labeled cells (expressed as cell number/g tissue weight) were present in three out of 13 lungs (mean of 12,724 +/- 7060 cells/g), four out of 13 livers (12,301 +/- 5924 cells/g), 11 out of 13 spleens (57,228 +/- 11,483 cells/g), zero out of 13 kidneys, 13 out of 13 infarcted myocardium (8,006,835 +/- 1,846,462 cells/g) and nine out of 13 noninfarcted myocardium (167,331 +/- 47,007 cells/g). However, compared with the saline plus MSC group, nanoparticles were detected to a lesser extent in remote organs in collagen plus MSC group. Nanoparticles were detected in two out of 13 lungs (4631 +/- 3176 cells/g; p = NS), zero out of 13 livers (0 cells/g; p <0.05 vs saline plus MSC), four out of 13 spleens (24,060 +/- 17,373 cells/g; p <0.05), zero out of 13 kidneys (p = NS) and five out of 13 noninfarcted myocardium (51,522 +/- 21,548 cells/g; p <0.05). In the collagen plus MSC group, nanoparticles were detected in 12 out of 13 infarcted myocardium (4,830,050 +/- 592,215 cells/g), which did not significantly differ from that in the saline plus MSC group (p = NS). Both saline plus MSCs and collagen alone improved left ventricular ejection fraction compared with saline treatment. However, collagen plus MSCs failed to improve cardiac function. CONCLUSIONS: Collagen matrix as a delivery vehicle significantly reduced the relocation of transplanted MSCs to remote organs and noninfarcted myocardium.
AIM: A limitation of cell therapy for heart disease is the fact that stem cells injected directly into the myocardium are capable of entering the vasculature and migrating to remote organs. We determined whether retention of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the infarcted myocardium could be improved by implanting the cells in a collagen matrix. METHODS: A myocardial infarction was induced by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery in Fischer rats. A total of 7 days after myocardial infarction, saline (n = 12), saline plus 2 million bone marrow-derived rat MSCs labeled with isotopic colloidal nanoparticles containing europium (n = 13), collagen (n = 13) or collagen plus 2 million labeled MSCs (n = 13) were directly injected into the infarcted myocardium. Tissues from the infarcted myocardium, noninfarcted myocardium, lung, liver, spleen and kidney were sampled 4 weeks later. Distribution of grafted MSCs was quantitatively analyzed by measuring the nanoparticle radioactivity in these tissues. Cardiac function was assessed by left ventriculography. RESULTS: There were zero nanoparticles detected in the tissues that received saline or collagen alone into the heart. Nanoparticles were detected in the heart and remote organs in the saline plus MSC group. Labeled cells (expressed as cell number/g tissue weight) were present in three out of 13 lungs (mean of 12,724 +/- 7060 cells/g), four out of 13 livers (12,301 +/- 5924 cells/g), 11 out of 13 spleens (57,228 +/- 11,483 cells/g), zero out of 13 kidneys, 13 out of 13 infarcted myocardium (8,006,835 +/- 1,846,462 cells/g) and nine out of 13 noninfarcted myocardium (167,331 +/- 47,007 cells/g). However, compared with the saline plus MSC group, nanoparticles were detected to a lesser extent in remote organs in collagen plus MSC group. Nanoparticles were detected in two out of 13 lungs (4631 +/- 3176 cells/g; p = NS), zero out of 13 livers (0 cells/g; p <0.05 vs saline plus MSC), four out of 13 spleens (24,060 +/- 17,373 cells/g; p <0.05), zero out of 13 kidneys (p = NS) and five out of 13 noninfarcted myocardium (51,522 +/- 21,548 cells/g; p <0.05). In the collagen plus MSC group, nanoparticles were detected in 12 out of 13 infarcted myocardium (4,830,050 +/- 592,215 cells/g), which did not significantly differ from that in the saline plus MSC group (p = NS). Both saline plus MSCs and collagen alone improved left ventricular ejection fraction compared with saline treatment. However, collagen plus MSCs failed to improve cardiac function. CONCLUSIONS: Collagen matrix as a delivery vehicle significantly reduced the relocation of transplanted MSCs to remote organs and noninfarcted myocardium.
Authors: Jonathan M Hill; Alexander J Dick; Venkatesh K Raman; Richard B Thompson; Zu-Xi Yu; K Allison Hinds; Breno S S Pessanha; Michael A Guttman; Timothy R Varney; Bradley J Martin; Cynthia E Dunbar; Elliot R McVeigh; Robert J Lederman Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-08-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Theo Kofidis; Darren R Lebl; Eliana C Martinez; Grant Hoyt; Masashi Tanaka; Robert C Robbins Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-08-30 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Wangde Dai; Sharon L Hale; Bradley J Martin; Jin-Qiang Kuang; Joan S Dow; Loren E Wold; Robert A Kloner Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-07-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ingo Kutschka; Ian Y Chen; Theo Kofidis; Takayasu Arai; Georges von Degenfeld; Ahmad Y Sheikh; Stephen L Hendry; Jeremy Pearl; Grant Hoyt; Ramachadra Sista; Phillip C Yang; Helen M Blau; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Robert C Robbins Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-07-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sarah Fernandes; Shannon Kuklok; Joe McGonigle; Hans Reinecke; Charles E Murry Journal: Cells Tissues Organs Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 2.481
Authors: Terry W J Steele; Charlotte L Huang; Evelyne Nguyen; Udi Sarig; Saranya Kumar; Effendi Widjaja; Joachim S C Loo; Marcelle Machluf; Freddy Boey; Zlata Vukadinovic; Andreas Hilfiker; Subbu S Venkatraman Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2013-05-14 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: J Y Wang; Akf Liou; Z H Ren; L Zhang; B N Brown; X T Cui; S F Badylak; Y N Cai; Y Q Guan; Rehana K Leak; J Chen; X Ji; L Chen Journal: CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 4.388